Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

MikroORM

17
67
+ 1
24
TypeORM

605
812
+ 1
81
Add tool

MikroORM vs TypeORM: What are the differences?

MikroORM and TypeORM are both TypeScript-based Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) libraries for simplifying database interactions in Node.js applications. Let's explore the key differences between them:

  1. ORM Support for Multiple Databases: MikroORM provides support for various databases like PostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB, and SQLite, whereas TypeORM supports a wider range of databases, including not only the ones supported by MikroORM but also Oracle, Microsoft SQL Server, and others.

  2. Nested Transactions: MikroORM offers nested transactions, allowing the developer to manage multiple levels of transactions within one another, which can be useful in complex scenarios. On the other hand, TypeORM does not explicitly support nested transactions, although it provides alternatives like savepoints and transaction isolation levels.

  3. Code Organization and Simplicity: MikroORM follows a minimalistic and opinionated approach to code organization, providing fewer code choices to developers and promoting simplicity. In contrast, TypeORM offers more flexibility and customization options, allowing developers to implement their preferred coding patterns and structures when working with the ORM.

  4. Integration with Unique Database Features: MikroORM is designed to seamlessly integrate with unique database features like entity id mappers, serialization, validation, and filtering. TypeORM, however, does not focus explicitly on these database features, leaving their implementation and integration as additional tasks for the developers.

  5. Query Building Approaches: MikroORM takes a Query Builder approach to build complex queries, which can be more intuitive and easier to use when compared to raw SQL queries. TypeORM, on the other hand, supports both Query Builder and Repository patterns, allowing developers to choose the most suitable approach for their specific needs.

  6. Package Size: MikroORM has a smaller package size, making it lightweight and suitable for projects with limited disk space or bandwidth. TypeORM, in contrast, has a larger package size due to its broader range of functionalities and wider database support.

In summary, MikroORM and TypeORM are TypeScript-friendly ORMs, with MikroORM emphasizing simplicity and extensibility, while TypeORM provides a comprehensive solution with broad database support and advanced features.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of MikroORM
Pros of TypeORM
  • 5
    Typescript
  • 4
    Supports both SQL and NoSQL
  • 3
    Powered by Unit of Work and Identity Map
  • 3
    Allows multiple ways to define entities
  • 3
    DRY Entities
  • 2
    Implicit Transactions
  • 2
    SQL layer built on top of Knex
  • 2
    EntityGenerator to reverse engineer existing database
  • 30
    Typescript
  • 12
    Supports MySQL, PostgreSQL, MariaDB, SQLite, MS SQL Ser
  • 9
    Easy setup
  • 9
    Cons of TypeORM
  • 7
    Promise Based
  • 7
    Works in NodeJS, Browser, Ionic, Cordova and Electron p
  • 6
    Support MySQL & MariaDB, PostgreSQL, MSSQL, Sqlite
  • 1
    Support MongoDB

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of MikroORM
Cons of TypeORM
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 5
      Completely abandoned by its creator
    • 3
      Too complex for what it does
    • 2
      Doesn't really support native javascript
    • 1
      Not proper/real type safety
    • 1
      Cannot use query on any relation

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    23
    366
    4.8K

    What is MikroORM?

    TypeScript ORM for Node.js based on Data Mapper, Unit of Work and Identity Map patterns. Supports MongoDB, MySQL, MariaDB, PostgreSQL and SQLite databases.

    What is TypeORM?

    It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    Jobs that mention MikroORM and TypeORM as a desired skillset
    What companies use MikroORM?
    What companies use TypeORM?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with MikroORM?
    What tools integrate with TypeORM?
      No integrations found
      What are some alternatives to MikroORM and TypeORM?
      MySQL
      The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.
      PostgreSQL
      PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.
      MongoDB
      MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.
      Redis
      Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. Redis provides data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, and streams.
      Amazon S3
      Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web
      See all alternatives