StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. MikroORM vs TypeORM

MikroORM vs TypeORM

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

TypeORM
TypeORM
Stacks757
Followers813
Votes81
GitHub Stars36.0K
Forks6.5K
MikroORM
MikroORM
Stacks18
Followers68
Votes24
GitHub Stars8.6K
Forks599

MikroORM vs TypeORM: What are the differences?

MikroORM and TypeORM are both TypeScript-based Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) libraries for simplifying database interactions in Node.js applications. Let's explore the key differences between them:

  1. ORM Support for Multiple Databases: MikroORM provides support for various databases like PostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB, and SQLite, whereas TypeORM supports a wider range of databases, including not only the ones supported by MikroORM but also Oracle, Microsoft SQL Server, and others.

  2. Nested Transactions: MikroORM offers nested transactions, allowing the developer to manage multiple levels of transactions within one another, which can be useful in complex scenarios. On the other hand, TypeORM does not explicitly support nested transactions, although it provides alternatives like savepoints and transaction isolation levels.

  3. Code Organization and Simplicity: MikroORM follows a minimalistic and opinionated approach to code organization, providing fewer code choices to developers and promoting simplicity. In contrast, TypeORM offers more flexibility and customization options, allowing developers to implement their preferred coding patterns and structures when working with the ORM.

  4. Integration with Unique Database Features: MikroORM is designed to seamlessly integrate with unique database features like entity id mappers, serialization, validation, and filtering. TypeORM, however, does not focus explicitly on these database features, leaving their implementation and integration as additional tasks for the developers.

  5. Query Building Approaches: MikroORM takes a Query Builder approach to build complex queries, which can be more intuitive and easier to use when compared to raw SQL queries. TypeORM, on the other hand, supports both Query Builder and Repository patterns, allowing developers to choose the most suitable approach for their specific needs.

  6. Package Size: MikroORM has a smaller package size, making it lightweight and suitable for projects with limited disk space or bandwidth. TypeORM, in contrast, has a larger package size due to its broader range of functionalities and wider database support.

In summary, MikroORM and TypeORM are TypeScript-friendly ORMs, with MikroORM emphasizing simplicity and extensibility, while TypeORM provides a comprehensive solution with broad database support and advanced features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

TypeORM
TypeORM
MikroORM
MikroORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

TypeScript ORM for Node.js based on Data Mapper, Unit of Work and Identity Map patterns. Supports MongoDB, MySQL, MariaDB, PostgreSQL and SQLite databases.

automatically create the database table schemes based on your models; transparently insert / update / delete to the database your objects; map your selections from tables to JavaScript objects and map table columns to object properties; easily create one-to-one, many-to-one, one-to-many and many-to-many relations between tables; and much more.
Implicit Transactions; DRY Entities; Supports both SQL and NoSQL; Clean and Simple Entity Definition; Identity Map; Entity References; Using Entity Constructors; Modelling Relationships; Collections; Unit of Work; Transactions; Cascading persist and remove; Using QueryBuilder; Preloading Deeply Nested Structures via populate; Property Validation; Lifecycle Hooks; Vanilla JS Support; Schema Generator; Entity Generator
Statistics
GitHub Stars
36.0K
GitHub Stars
8.6K
GitHub Forks
6.5K
GitHub Forks
599
Stacks
757
Stacks
18
Followers
813
Followers
68
Votes
81
Votes
24
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 30
    Typescript
  • 12
    Supports MySQL, PostgreSQL, MariaDB, SQLite, MS SQL Ser
  • 9
    Cons of TypeORM
  • 9
    Easy setup
  • 7
    Works in NodeJS, Browser, Ionic, Cordova and Electron p
Cons
  • 5
    Completely abandoned by its creator
  • 3
    Too complex for what it does
  • 2
    Doesn't really support native javascript
  • 1
    Cannot use query on any relation
  • 1
    Not proper/real type safety
Pros
  • 5
    Typescript
  • 4
    Supports both SQL and NoSQL
  • 3
    Powered by Unit of Work and Identity Map
  • 3
    Allows multiple ways to define entities
  • 3
    DRY Entities
Integrations
No integrations available
Safari
Safari

What are some alternatives to TypeORM, MikroORM?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Sequelize

Sequelize

Sequelize is a promise-based ORM for Node.js and io.js. It supports the dialects PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQLite and MSSQL and features solid transaction support, relations, read replication and more.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase