StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Moby vs Portainer

Moby vs Portainer

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Portainer
Portainer
Stacks506
Followers842
Votes146
Moby
Moby
Stacks38
Followers57
Votes0
GitHub Stars71.0K
Forks18.8K

Moby vs Portainer: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>
  1. Operational Differences: Moby is designed to be used as a module within Docker, allowing users to manage and build container-based systems. In contrast, Portainer is a separate management tool that provides a user-friendly interface for managing Docker containers and clusters.

  2. User Interface: Moby primarily focuses on handling the low-level tasks of managing containers and images, with a command-line interface that requires more technical knowledge. Portainer, on the other hand, offers a graphical user interface that simplifies the management and monitoring of Docker environments, making it more accessible to users without extensive technical expertise.

  3. Scalability: Moby is more suitable for small to medium-sized projects or individual use cases due to its integration with Docker. Portainer, on the other hand, is designed to manage larger-scale container deployments, offering features like role-based access control and multi-host management for improved scalability.

  4. Community Support: Moby is maintained by the Docker project and has a strong community of contributors focused on core container technologies. Portainer, while also benefiting from community contributions, has a more targeted user base looking for specific Docker management features, leading to a different support ecosystem.

  5. Customization Options: Moby provides greater flexibility for users who want to customize their container environments, offering a modular architecture that allows for deeper integration and customization. Portainer, while offering some degree of customization, is more focused on providing a streamlined, out-of-the-box solution for managing Docker containers.

  6. Integration Capabilities: Moby integrates seamlessly with Docker to provide a comprehensive container management solution, leveraging Docker's underlying technologies and APIs. Portainer, while compatible with Docker, offers additional integrations with Kubernetes, Amazon ECS, and other container orchestration tools, expanding its capabilities beyond Docker-specific environments.

In Summary, Moby and Portainer differ in their operational focus, user interfaces, scalability, community support, customization options, and integration capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Portainer
Portainer
Moby
Moby

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Moby is a project which provides a “Lego set” of dozens of components, the framework for assembling them into custom container-based systems, and a place for all container enthusiasts to experiment and exchange ideas. Docker the product will be assembled from components that are packaged by the Moby project.

Docker management; Docker UI; Docker cluster management; Swarm visualizer; Authentication; User Access Control; Docker container management; Docker service management; Docker overview; Docker console; Docker swarm status; Docker image management; Docker network management; Docker dashboard; Remote HTTP API; Automation
Orchestration; Image Management; Secret Management; Configuration Management; Networking; Provisioning
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
71.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
18.8K
Stacks
506
Stacks
38
Followers
842
Followers
57
Votes
146
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 36
    Simple
  • 27
    Great UI
  • 19
    Friendly
  • 12
    Easy to setup, gives a practical interface for Docker
  • 11
    Because it just works, super simple yet powerful
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm
Docker Secrets
Docker Secrets
Auth0
Auth0
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to Portainer, Moby?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Kitematic

Kitematic

Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana