StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Monitoring
  4. Monitoring Tools
  5. Monit vs NetData

Monit vs NetData

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Monit
Monit
Stacks166
Followers54
Votes0
Netdata
Netdata
Stacks226
Followers392
Votes82

Monit vs NetData: What are the differences?

Introduction

Monit and NetData are two popular open-source tools used for monitoring and managing system resources. While both tools are used for monitoring purposes, they have key differences that set them apart from each other. Below are some of the key differences between Monit and NetData.

  1. Installation and Configuration: Monit requires manual installation and configuration on each system being monitored, while NetData offers a more automated installation process as it can be installed using a single command. NetData also has a web-based interface that allows for easy configuration and monitoring.

  2. Scope of Monitoring: Monit primarily focuses on monitoring individual processes and system resources such as CPU, memory, and disk usage. It provides alerts and can take corrective actions based on predefined rules. On the other hand, NetData offers a more comprehensive monitoring solution by providing real-time metrics and visualizations for multiple system components, including network interfaces, disk I/O, sensors, and more. NetData can also monitor distributed systems and collect data from multiple sources.

  3. Data Visualization: Monit provides a simple text-based output that displays the status of monitored processes and resources. It also sends alerts via email or other methods. In contrast, NetData offers highly detailed real-time graphs and charts, allowing administrators to visualize resource usage and identify any performance bottlenecks or anomalies. The visualizations provided by NetData can be accessed through its web-based interface.

  4. User Interface: Monit primarily uses command-line tools for configuration and management, making it more suitable for experienced users comfortable with the command line. NetData, on the other hand, provides a user-friendly web-based interface that is easy to navigate even for novice users. The interface allows users to quickly access and analyze system metrics without the need for any command-line knowledge.

  5. Compatibility: Monit is compatible with a wide range of Unix-like operating systems, including Linux, FreeBSD, and macOS. NetData, on the other hand, can be installed on a variety of systems, including Linux, FreeBSD, macOS, and even low-power devices like Raspberry Pi.

  6. Community and Support: Both Monit and NetData have active communities and provide support through forums and documentation. However, NetData has a larger and more active community, which often results in faster bug fixes, new feature implementations, and a wider range of support resources available.

In summary, Monit and NetData are both powerful monitoring tools, but they differ in their installation and configuration processes, scope of monitoring, visualization capabilities, user interfaces, compatibility with different operating systems, and the size and activity level of their respective communities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Monit, Netdata

Shoaib
Shoaib

Dec 23, 2019

Needs advice

Hi, I have a simple script that dynamically spawns independent processes (through bash). Which tool should I use to monitor the spawned processes assuming I have the PIDs(/pid files) of the spawned processes? Monit seems to be useful for monitoring pre-configured processes but I need something for monitoring dynamic PID/PID files. Prometheus seems to be needing HTTP endpoints. A beginner

62.7k views62.7k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Monit
Monit
Netdata
Netdata

It can monitor and manage distributed computer systems, conduct automatic maintenance and repair and execute meaningful causal actions in error situations.

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Responsive UI; Control Services Remotely; Services Monitoring modes
Free, open-source; Easy installation and configuration; Access to monitoring unlimited metrics; Prebuilt dashboards and alarms; alerts on any metric, for a single host, an entire cluster, or your entire infrastructure; Tools for team collaboration; 800+ integrations
Statistics
Stacks
166
Stacks
226
Followers
54
Followers
392
Votes
0
Votes
82
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 17
    Free
  • 14
    Easy setup
  • 12
    Graphs are interactive
  • 9
    Montiors datasbases
  • 9
    Well maintained on github
Integrations
Slack
Slack
FreeBSD
FreeBSD
HipChat
HipChat
Pushover
Pushover
Puppet Labs
Puppet Labs
CouchDB
CouchDB
ActiveMQ
ActiveMQ
Logstash
Logstash
Fail2ban
Fail2ban
TimescaleDB
TimescaleDB
Windows
Windows
Grafana
Grafana
MongoDB
MongoDB
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ

What are some alternatives to Monit, Netdata?

Grafana

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Zabbix

Zabbix

Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.

Sensu

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Graphite

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

StatsD

StatsD

It is a network daemon that runs on the Node.js platform and listens for statistics, like counters and timers, sent over UDP or TCP and sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services (e.g., Graphite).

Jaeger

Jaeger

Jaeger, a Distributed Tracing System

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana