StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Monitoring
  4. Monitoring Tools
  5. Monit vs Zabbix

Monit vs Zabbix

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Zabbix
Zabbix
Stacks684
Followers981
Votes66
GitHub Stars5.3K
Forks1.1K
Monit
Monit
Stacks166
Followers54
Votes0

Monit vs Zabbix: What are the differences?

  1. Monitoring Approach: Monit is a proactive monitoring tool that focuses on specific process monitoring and system health checks, sending alerts and taking automated actions when predefined conditions are met. On the other hand, Zabbix is an extensive enterprise-grade monitoring solution that offers monitoring of various metrics, such as network devices, servers, services, and applications, with a centralized approach for visualization and reporting.

  2. Ease of Use: Monit is relatively easier to set up and configure compared to Zabbix, which requires more complex configuration due to its extensive features and capabilities. Monit is suitable for users looking for a straightforward monitoring tool, while Zabbix caters to larger organizations with more advanced monitoring needs.

  3. Agent-based Monitoring: Monit does not require any agent installation on the target systems as it operates through executed scripts, while Zabbix relies on agent installation for monitoring host metrics. This difference in monitoring approach affects the deployment process and system resource requirements for each tool.

  4. Alerting Mechanism: Monit primarily focuses on sending alerts and notifications when specific conditions are met, and it can take automated actions based on predefined rules. In contrast, Zabbix offers a more comprehensive alerting mechanism with the ability to configure triggers based on complex conditions and escalation levels for notifications.

  5. Scalability: Zabbix is designed for large-scale deployments, offering features like distributed monitoring, proxy servers, and high availability setups. Monit, on the other hand, is more suitable for smaller environments or single-server monitoring due to its simpler architecture and limited scalability options.

  6. Community Support and Development: Zabbix has a larger user community and active development, leading to frequent updates, new features, and wider compatibility with different systems and technologies. Monit, while regularly maintained, may have a smaller community and fewer resources available for troubleshooting and support.

In Summary, Monit is a straightforward monitoring tool focused on process monitoring and system health checks, while Zabbix is a comprehensive enterprise-grade solution with extensive monitoring capabilities and scalability options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Zabbix, Monit

vivek
vivek

Jun 8, 2020

Needs adviceonCentreonCentreonZabbixZabbixDatadogDatadog

My team is divided on using Centreon or Zabbix for enterprise monitoring and alert automation. Can someone let us know which one is better? There is one more tool called Datadog that we are using for cloud assets. Of course, Datadog presents us with huge bills. So we want to have a comparative study. Suggestions and advice are welcome. Thanks!

795k views795k
Comments
Shoaib
Shoaib

Dec 23, 2019

Needs advice

Hi, I have a simple script that dynamically spawns independent processes (through bash). Which tool should I use to monitor the spawned processes assuming I have the PIDs(/pid files) of the spawned processes? Monit seems to be useful for monitoring pre-configured processes but I need something for monitoring dynamic PID/PID files. Prometheus seems to be needing HTTP endpoints. A beginner

62.7k views62.7k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Zabbix
Zabbix
Monit
Monit

Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.

It can monitor and manage distributed computer systems, conduct automatic maintenance and repair and execute meaningful causal actions in error situations.

Smart, Highly Automated Metric Collection; Advanced Problem Detection; Intelligent Alerting and Remediation
Responsive UI; Control Services Remotely; Services Monitoring modes
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
684
Stacks
166
Followers
981
Followers
54
Votes
66
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 21
    Free
  • 9
    Alerts
  • 5
    Service/node/network discovery
  • 5
    Templates
  • 4
    Base metrics from the box
Cons
  • 5
    The UI is in PHP
  • 2
    Puppet module is sluggish
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Slack
Slack
Jira
Jira
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
Grafana
Grafana
Ansible
Ansible
Skype
Skype
Chef
Chef
Bugzilla
Bugzilla
HipChat
HipChat
ServiceNow.com
ServiceNow.com
Slack
Slack
FreeBSD
FreeBSD
HipChat
HipChat
Pushover
Pushover

What are some alternatives to Zabbix, Monit?

Grafana

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Netdata

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Sensu

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Graphite

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

StatsD

StatsD

It is a network daemon that runs on the Node.js platform and listens for statistics, like counters and timers, sent over UDP or TCP and sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services (e.g., Graphite).

Jaeger

Jaeger

Jaeger, a Distributed Tracing System

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana