StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Tools For Text Editors
  5. NCrunch vs ReSharper

NCrunch vs ReSharper

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ReSharper
ReSharper
Stacks236
Followers263
Votes24
NCrunch
NCrunch
Stacks5
Followers5
Votes0

NCrunch vs ReSharper: What are the differences?

Introduction: Comparing NCrunch and ReSharper, two popular tools for .NET developers, we can explore their key differences and understand how they cater to different aspects of the software development process.

  1. Execution and Testing: NCrunch stands out as a powerful continuous testing tool that provides real-time feedback on code changes. It automatically executes tests in the background as code is modified and visually highlights test results right in the code editor. This allows developers to quickly identify and fix issues without the need for manual testing. On the other hand, ReSharper is primarily focused on code analysis and refactoring, providing features to enhance code quality and maintainability. While it does offer test runner capabilities, they are not as real-time and tightly integrated as NCrunch.

  2. Code Analysis and Refactoring: ReSharper excels at code analysis and refactoring, providing a wide range of features to improve code quality and productivity. Its inspections identify potential issues, suggest improvements, and offer quick-fixes to automatically resolve them. ReSharper also offers powerful refactoring tools that automate common code transformations, allowing developers to easily make their code more efficient, organized, and maintainable. NCrunch, on the other hand, focuses more on continuous testing and lacks the extensive code analysis and refactoring capabilities offered by ReSharper.

  3. Integration with IDE: ReSharper integrates seamlessly with Microsoft Visual Studio, enhancing the IDE with its extensive feature set. It deeply integrates with the editor, providing code suggestions, navigation, and refactoring options right where developers are working. On the other hand, NCrunch has its own dedicated window within Visual Studio, providing a separate interface specifically designed for viewing real-time test results and coverage information. This separate window can be a benefit or a drawback depending on personal preference and workflow.

  4. Support for Multiple Languages and Technologies: ReSharper is known for its wide language support, including C#, VB.NET, ASP.NET, JavaScript, TypeScript, and many more. It offers specialized features tailored to each language and provides code inspections, refactorings, and suggestions specific to the technology being used. NCrunch, on the other hand, primarily focuses on supporting the testing and coverage aspects of the development process, rather than providing extensive language and technology-specific features.

  5. Learning Curve and Performance Impact: ReSharper, due to its extensive feature set, may have a steeper learning curve, especially for developers who are new to the tool. It requires some time and effort to explore and get comfortable with all the available features. Additionally, it can have a noticeable performance impact on the IDE, especially when working with large codebases. NCrunch, on the other hand, has a more straightforward setup and offers a smoother learning curve, making it easier to get started with continuous testing.

  6. Pricing Model and Licensing: ReSharper follows a commercial licensing model, where developers need to purchase a license to use the tool. It offers different license types based on individual developers, organizations, or educational purposes. NCrunch, on the other hand, offers a subscription-based pricing model, providing different subscription plans, including monthly and yearly options. This allows developers to choose a pricing plan that best suits their needs and budget.

In summary, NCrunch primarily focuses on providing real-time continuous testing capabilities, whereas ReSharper excels in code analysis, refactoring, and enhancing the overall development experience within Microsoft Visual Studio.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

ReSharper
ReSharper
NCrunch
NCrunch

It is a popular developer productivity extension for Microsoft Visual Studio. It automates most of what can be automated in your coding routines. It finds compiler errors, runtime errors, redundancies, and code smells right as you type, suggesting intelligent corrections for them.

It is an automated concurrent testing tool for Visual Studio. It intelligently runs automated tests so that you don't have to, while giving you amazingly useful information about your tested code, such as code coverage and performance metrics, inline in your IDE while you type.

-
Automatic Concurrent Testing;Code Coverage;Performance Metrics;Inline Exception Details;Intelligent Test Execution;Distributed Processing;Small Memory Footprint;Parallel Execution;Optimised Build Process;Smart Multiprocessor Support;Easy Debugging; Part Continuous/Manual Mode;Integrated to Visual Studio
Statistics
Stacks
236
Stacks
5
Followers
263
Followers
5
Votes
24
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Early discover bugs
  • 6
    Refactor also using different code
  • 5
    IDE Integration
  • 4
    Highlighted //todo //bug
  • 3
    Spell checking
Cons
  • 8
    Visual studio become slower
No community feedback yet
Integrations
.NET
.NET
.NET Core
.NET Core
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Visual Studio

What are some alternatives to ReSharper, NCrunch?

Sentry

Sentry

Sentry’s Application Monitoring platform helps developers see performance issues, fix errors faster, and optimize their code health.

Rollbar

Rollbar

Rollbar is the leading continuous code improvement platform that proactively discovers, predicts, and remediates errors with real-time AI-assisted workflows. With Rollbar, developers continually improve their code and constantly innovate ra

Bugsnag

Bugsnag

Bugsnag captures errors from your web, mobile and back-end applications, providing instant visibility into user impact. Diagnostic data and tools are included to help your team prioritize, debug and fix exceptions fast.

Raygun

Raygun

Raygun gives you a window into how users are really experiencing your software applications. Detect, diagnose and resolve issues that are affecting end users with greater speed and accuracy.

Opbeat

Opbeat

Opbeat is application monitoring for developers, and gives you performance metrics, error logging, release tracking and workflow in one smart product.

Airbrake

Airbrake

Airbrake collects errors for your applications in all major languages and frameworks. We alert you to new errors and give you critical context, trends and details needed to find and fix errors fast.

Spacemacs

Spacemacs

Since version 0.101.0 and later Spacemacs totally abolishes the frontiers between Vim and Emacs. The user can now choose his/her preferred editing style and enjoy all the Spacemacs features. Even better, it is possible to dynamically switch between the two styles seamlessly which makes it possible for programmers with different styles to do seat pair programming using the same editor.

Honeybadger

Honeybadger

Honeybadger does more than report errors, it helps you work with your team to fix them. Errors can be assigned. You can comment via email. And a fine-grained permissions system means you control who has access to each specific project.

Errbit

Errbit

Errbit is a tool for collecting and managing errors from other applications. It is Airbrake (formerly known as Hoptoad) API compliant, so if you are already using Airbrake, you can just point the airbrake gem to your Errbit server.

OverOps

OverOps

OverOps maps the DNA of code as it’s executing in pre-prod and production to Identify all issues and anomalies, and deliver True Root Cause to the right person, without relying on logs.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana