Nemo.js
Nemo.js

2
11
0
Rainforest QA
Rainforest QA

23
29
52
Add tool

Nemo.js vs Rainforest QA: What are the differences?

Nemo.js: PayPal’s open source node.js automation framework. Nemo provides a simple way to add selenium automation to your NodeJS web projects. Provides plugin architecture to incorporate custom features to your tests; Rainforest QA: Front-end QA as a service. Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

Nemo.js and Rainforest QA can be categorized as "Browser Testing" tools.

Some of the features offered by Nemo.js are:

  • Nemo.js wraps around the ubiquitous Selenium WebDriver, and as such, allows control of virtually any browser on any operating system
  • Built with a plugin architecture
  • Easy interface for authoring new plugins that can then be shared with others

On the other hand, Rainforest QA provides the following key features:

  • Infinitely Scalable, On-Demand QA Team
  • Cross Browser Testing
  • Regression, Functional, and Exploratory Testing

Nemo.js is an open source tool with 5 GitHub stars and 4 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Nemo.js's open source repository on GitHub.

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Nemo.js?

Nemo provides a simple way to add selenium automation to your NodeJS web projects. Provides plugin architecture to incorporate custom features to your tests.

What is Rainforest QA?

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

Want advice about which of these to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Nemo.js?
Why do developers choose Rainforest QA?
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

    What are the cons of using Nemo.js?
    What are the cons of using Rainforest QA?
      Be the first to leave a con
        Be the first to leave a con
        What companies use Nemo.js?
        What companies use Rainforest QA?

        Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

        What tools integrate with Nemo.js?
        What tools integrate with Rainforest QA?

        Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

        What are some alternatives to Nemo.js and Rainforest QA?
        Selenium
        Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
        BrowserStack
        Live, Web-Based Browser Testing Instant access to all real mobile and desktop browsers. Say goodbye to your lab of devices and virtual machines.
        Karma
        Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.
        LambdaTest
        LambdaTest is a cloud-based testing platform and it provides access to a powerful network cloud of 2000+ real browsers and operating system that helps testers in cross-browser and cross-platform compatibility testing.
        Sauce Labs
        Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.
        See all alternatives
        Decisions about Nemo.js and Rainforest QA
        No stack decisions found
        Interest over time
        Reviews of Nemo.js and Rainforest QA
        Review ofRainforest QARainforest QA

        As a PM with a fair amount of testing experience I've been using Rainforest QA to build up a functional test suite for our web app. Writing tests is straightforward and it's nice to then get real humans executing the tests so that you can get readable feedback when something isn't working. I'd certainly recommend giving it a try to see if it might fit your workflow.

        How developers use Nemo.js and Rainforest QA
        Avatar of LUMA Institute
        LUMA Institute uses Rainforest QARainforest QA

        Automated end-to-end testing that gets our code and user experiences tested more quickly. Can be scripted. Great in a continuous delivery model.

        How much does Nemo.js cost?
        How much does Rainforest QA cost?
        Pricing unavailable
        News about Nemo.js
        More news
        News about Rainforest QA
        More news