Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Nemo.js vs Rainforest QA: What are the differences?
Nemo.js: PayPal’s open source node.js automation framework. Nemo provides a simple way to add selenium automation to your NodeJS web projects. Provides plugin architecture to incorporate custom features to your tests; Rainforest QA: Front-end QA as a service. Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.
Nemo.js and Rainforest QA can be categorized as "Browser Testing" tools.
Some of the features offered by Nemo.js are:
- Nemo.js wraps around the ubiquitous Selenium WebDriver, and as such, allows control of virtually any browser on any operating system
- Built with a plugin architecture
- Easy interface for authoring new plugins that can then be shared with others
On the other hand, Rainforest QA provides the following key features:
- Infinitely Scalable, On-Demand QA Team
- Cross Browser Testing
- Regression, Functional, and Exploratory Testing
Nemo.js is an open source tool with 5 GitHub stars and 4 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Nemo.js's open source repository on GitHub.
Pros of Nemo.js
Pros of Rainforest QA
- Cross-browser testing13
- Powerful API7
- QA7
- Super-simple test creation7
- Easy way to get real front-end smoke tests6
- Simple5
- CI Integration5
- Manual regression testing results in 30 mins3
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
What is Nemo.js?
What is Rainforest QA?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Nemo.js?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Nemo.js?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+24