StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Node.js vs Redwood

Node.js vs Redwood

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Node.js
Node.js
Stacks200.4K
Followers164.5K
Votes8.5K
GitHub Stars114.1K
Forks33.7K
Redwood
Redwood
Stacks28
Followers50
Votes6

Node.js vs Redwood: What are the differences?

Introduction: Node.js and Redwood are both popular JavaScript-based frameworks used for building web applications. However, there are key differences between the two that developers should consider when choosing a framework for their projects.

  1. Architecture: Node.js is a runtime environment that allows developers to execute JavaScript code server-side, while Redwood is a full-stack framework that provides a structured architecture with built-in features for front-end and back-end development. Redwood follows the Jamstack architecture, combining the best practices of traditional web development with modern technologies.

  2. File Structure: In Node.js, developers have more flexibility in organizing their project files and folders as there are no strict guidelines to follow. Conversely, Redwood enforces a specific file structure that follows conventions to promote consistency and improve collaboration among team members. This structured approach in Redwood can help developers quickly locate and understand different parts of the project.

  3. ORM Integration: Node.js requires developers to choose and configure an Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) library separately to interact with databases. Redwood, on the other hand, comes with Prisma, an ORM that simplifies database operations by providing a type-safe query builder and auto-generating API services. This built-in integration in Redwood reduces the setup time and complexity involved in database management.

  4. Server Configuration: In Node.js, developers are responsible for setting up and configuring the server environment, such as choosing a web server (e.g., Express.js) and managing server-related tasks. In contrast, Redwood abstracts away the server configuration by providing an opinionated setup powered by GraphQL and services like API Gateway. This streamlined approach in Redwood allows developers to focus more on building and optimizing application features.

  5. Deployment: Node.js applications require manual deployment on hosting services like Heroku or AWS, where developers have to configure servers and manage scaling and maintenance tasks. In Redwood, deployment is simplified through services like Netlify, which offer seamless integration for deploying static sites, serverless functions, and APIs. This streamlined deployment process in Redwood can save time and effort for developers.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Node.js has a larger and more established community with a vast ecosystem of libraries and tools, making it easier for developers to find solutions and resources. Redwood, being a newer framework, has a growing community and ecosystem that focuses on enhancing the developer experience and pushing the boundaries of modern web development practices. Developers can benefit from the active community in Node.js and the innovative approaches in Redwood for building scalable web applications.

In Summary, Node.js and Redwood exhibit differences in architecture, file structure, ORM integration, server configuration, deployment, and community ecosystem, offering developers distinct choices for building web applications based on their requirements and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Node.js, Redwood

abderrahmane
abderrahmane

Mar 12, 2020

Needs advice

I am a front-end guy and in the last month I've been trynig to be learn backend in python. I think python is a great language to but when i start to learn django I didn't like it because everythong is already done for you, you dont need to do much make it works and I like coding thing that take me time. I've been thinking about switching to another programing language or just learn Node js and stick with it. I need to know if django is that easy.

136k views136k
Comments
Mohammad
Mohammad

Oct 28, 2019

Needs adviceonNode.jsNode.jsLaravelLaravelPHPPHP

I want to create a video sharing service like Youtube, which users can use to upload and watch videos. I prefer to use Vue.js for front-end. What do you suggest for the back-end? @{Node.js}|tool:1011| or @{Laravel}|tool:992| ( @{PHP}|tool:991| ) I need a good performance with high speed, and the most important thing is the ability to handle user's requests if the site's traffic increases. I want to create an algorithm that users who watch others videos earn points (randomly but in clear context) If you have anything else to improve, please let me know. For eg: If you prefer React to Vue.js. Thanks in advance

309k views309k
Comments
Zubair
Zubair

Director at Aafiyah Technologies

Mar 12, 2020

Needs advice

Hi Team

I want your suggestions in order for me to decide which stack is suitable for the below-mentioned requirement.

Currently, I am considering building it in Wordpress (Starting with prebuilt plugins and develop on it)

But I am skeptical, so I am considering Laravel.

And recently I found one very good solution built in Angular, Node and MySQL

Here are the high-level goals I am trying to achieve:

The system has 3 modules

  • Multi-Vendor e-commerce Market Place
  • Peer to peer Selling of used items
  • Listing/ Directory kind of portal for the service industry
290k views290k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Node.js
Node.js
Redwood
Redwood

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

It is an opinionated, full-stack, serverless web application framework that will allow you to build and deploy JAMstack applications with ease. Imagine a React frontend, statically delivered by CDN, that talks via GraphQL to your backend running on AWS Lambdas around the world, all deployable with just a git push—that's Redwood.

-
Opinionated defaults for formatting, file organization, webpack, Babel, and more; Simple but powerful routing (all routes defined in one file) with dynamic (typed) parameters, constraints, and named route functions (to generate correct URLs); Automatic page-based code-splitting; Boilerplate-less GraphQL API construction; Cells: a declarative way to fetch data from the backend API; Generators for pages, layouts, cells, SDL, services, etc; Scaffold generator for CRUD operations around a specific DB table; Forms with easy client- and/or server-side validation and error handling; Hot module replacement (HMR) for faster development; Database migrations (via Prisma 2); First class JAMstack-style deployment to Netlify
Statistics
GitHub Stars
114.1K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
33.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
200.4K
Stacks
28
Followers
164.5K
Followers
50
Votes
8.5K
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1439
    Npm
  • 1279
    Javascript
  • 1129
    Great libraries
  • 1012
    High-performance
  • 805
    Open source
Cons
  • 46
    Bound to a single CPU
  • 45
    New framework every day
  • 40
    Lots of terrible examples on the internet
  • 33
    Asynchronous programming is the worst
  • 24
    Callback
Pros
  • 2
    Cells
  • 2
    React+Prisma+GraphQL
  • 1
    Easy setup + generators
  • 1
    Storybook integrated development
Integrations
No integrations available
React
React
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Netlify
Netlify
GraphQL
GraphQL

What are some alternatives to Node.js, Redwood?

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase