StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Dependency Management
  5. NuGet vs Paket

NuGet vs Paket

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Paket
Paket
Stacks7
Followers7
Votes0
GitHub Stars2.1K
Forks520
NuGet
NuGet
Stacks10.2K
Followers172
Votes0

NuGet vs Paket: What are the differences?

Introduction

NuGet and Paket are both package managers for .NET development, but they have some key differences that set them apart. In this Markdown document, I will highlight six of these differences and provide a brief description for each.

  1. Dependency Resolution: NuGet uses transitive dependency resolution, which means that it will try to find the latest compatible version of a package and all its dependencies. Paket, on the other hand, uses a "strict" dependency resolution approach, which means that it will only allow a single version of a package to be referenced in the project. This can be helpful in avoiding version conflicts.

  2. Package Sources: NuGet supports both public and private package sources, allowing developers to access packages from various sources. Paket, however, focuses mainly on Git repositories and does not have built-in support for other package sources. This can be limiting if you need to use packages from sources other than Git.

  3. Package Locking: Paket has built-in support for package locking, which ensures that the same versions of packages are used across different machines and builds. NuGet does not have this feature natively, but it can be achieved using external tools or workflows. Package locking can help in creating consistent and reproducible builds.

  4. Project Integration: NuGet is tightly integrated with Visual Studio, providing a seamless experience for managing packages within the IDE. Paket, on the other hand, is a command-line tool that can be used independently of any IDE. This can be advantageous if you prefer to work outside of Visual Studio or use a different IDE.

  5. File Structure: NuGet organizes packages in a single folder in the project directory, with each package having its own subfolder. Paket, however, uses a flat file structure, where all packages are stored in a single folder. This can make it easier to navigate and manage packages, especially when working with large projects or complex dependency graphs.

  6. Lockfile Format: NuGet uses a project file (".csproj") to manage package references and their versions. Paket, on the other hand, uses a separate "paket.lock" file to store the exact versions of packages used in a project. This can make it easier to track and manage package versions, especially when working in a team or across different environments.

In summary, NuGet and Paket have some key differences in terms of dependency resolution, package sources, package locking, project integration, file structure, and lockfile format. These differences can influence the package management experience and the overall development workflow for .NET projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Paket
Paket
NuGet
NuGet

It is a dependency manager for .NET and mono projects, which is designed to work well with NuGet packages and also enables referencing files directly from Git repositories or any HTTP resource. It enables precise and predictable control over what packages the projects within your application reference.

A free and open-source package manager designed for the Microsoft development platform. It is also distributed as a Visual Studio extension.

dependency manager for .NET ; Support for NuGet packages ;Support for git repositories
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
2.1K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
520
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
7
Stacks
10.2K
Followers
7
Followers
172
Votes
0
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 0
    Best package (and maybe only 1) management for .NET
Integrations
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Git
Git
.NET
.NET
Linux
Linux
Atom
Atom
GitHub
GitHub
Emacs
Emacs
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
macOS
macOS
Windows
Windows
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
.NET
.NET

What are some alternatives to Paket, NuGet?

Meteor

Meteor

A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.

Bower

Bower

Bower is a package manager for the web. It offers a generic, unopinionated solution to the problem of front-end package management, while exposing the package dependency model via an API that can be consumed by a more opinionated build stack. There are no system wide dependencies, no dependencies are shared between different apps, and the dependency tree is flat.

Elm

Elm

Writing HTML apps is super easy with elm-lang/html. Not only does it render extremely fast, it also quietly guides you towards well-architected code.

Julia

Julia

Julia is a high-level, high-performance dynamic programming language for technical computing, with syntax that is familiar to users of other technical computing environments. It provides a sophisticated compiler, distributed parallel execution, numerical accuracy, and an extensive mathematical function library.

Racket

Racket

It is a general-purpose, multi-paradigm programming language based on the Scheme dialect of Lisp. It is designed to be a platform for programming language design and implementation. It is also used for scripting, computer science education, and research.

PureScript

PureScript

A small strongly typed programming language with expressive types that compiles to JavaScript, written in and inspired by Haskell.

Composer

Composer

It is a tool for dependency management in PHP. It allows you to declare the libraries your project depends on and it will manage (install/update) them for you.

pnpm

pnpm

It uses hard links and symlinks to save one version of a module only ever once on a disk. When using npm or Yarn for example, if you have 100 projects using the same version of lodash, you will have 100 copies of lodash on disk. With pnpm, lodash will be saved in a single place on the disk and a hard link will put it into the node_modules where it should be installed.

Bun

Bun

Develop, test, run, and bundle JavaScript & TypeScript projects—all with Bun. Bun is an all-in-one JavaScript runtime & toolkit designed for speed, complete with a bundler, test runner, and Node.js-compatible package manager.

Homebrew

Homebrew

Homebrew installs the stuff you need that Apple didn’t. Homebrew installs packages to their own directory and then symlinks their files into /usr/local.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana