Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Objection.js vs TypeORM: What are the differences?
Introduction:
In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Objection.js and TypeORM, two popular Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) libraries for JavaScript. Both libraries provide solutions for working with databases in a more object-oriented and convenient manner. However, there are several differences between them that may influence your choice when deciding which one to use.
Data Querying and Manipulation: Objection.js uses a query builder approach, where queries are constructed using a chainable API. This allows for more flexibility and customization in writing complex queries. On the other hand, TypeORM provides a more declarative approach, allowing you to define your models using decorators and use simple CRUD operations for querying and manipulating data.
Database Support: Objection.js supports a wide range of databases, including PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite, and Oracle. It also provides advanced features like advanced JSON querying and transaction handling. TypeORM, on the other hand, supports a similar set of databases but also includes support for MongoDB, MongoDB replica set, and CockroachDB. It provides features like automatic database schema migrations and advanced data types.
Integration with Frameworks: Objection.js is tightly integrated with the Express.js framework, making it more suitable for building web applications using Express.js. It provides middleware functions to automatically fetch and persist relational data. In contrast, TypeORM is a standalone library that can be used with any JavaScript framework or runtime environment.
Performance: Objection.js is known for its performance and efficiency, especially when dealing with complex queries and large datasets. It provides advanced query optimization techniques and lazy loading of related data. TypeORM also provides good performance but may not be as optimized for extreme scenarios.
Ease of Use and Learning Curve: Objection.js has a steeper learning curve compared to TypeORM, as it requires understanding the query builder syntax and some advanced concepts like model relations and query chaining. TypeORM, on the other hand, provides a simpler and more intuitive API, making it easier to get started and work with for beginners.
Community and Support: Both Objection.js and TypeORM have active communities and offer good documentation and support. Objection.js has been around for a longer time and has a larger community. It also has a well-maintained repository and regular updates. TypeORM, being a newer library, is rapidly gaining popularity and has an active community.
In Summary, Objection.js and TypeORM differ in their approach to data querying and manipulation, database support, integration with frameworks, performance, ease of use, and community support. Depending on your specific requirements and familiarity with different concepts, you can choose the library that suits your needs best.
Pros of Objection.js
Pros of TypeORM
- Typescript30
- Supports MySQL, PostgreSQL, MariaDB, SQLite, MS SQL Ser12
- Easy setup9
- Cons of TypeORM9
- Promise Based7
- Works in NodeJS, Browser, Ionic, Cordova and Electron p7
- Support MySQL & MariaDB, PostgreSQL, MSSQL, Sqlite6
- Support MongoDB1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Objection.js
Cons of TypeORM
- Completely abandoned by its creator5
- Too complex for what it does3
- Doesn't really support native javascript2
- Not proper/real type safety1
- Cannot use query on any relation1