Objection.js vs TypeORM

Overview

Objection.js

Stacks38

Followers67

Votes0

GitHub Stars7.3K

Forks641

TypeORM

Stacks757

Followers813

Votes81

GitHub Stars36.0K

Forks6.5K

Objection.js vs TypeORM: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Objection.js and TypeORM, two popular Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) libraries for JavaScript. Both libraries provide solutions for working with databases in a more object-oriented and convenient manner. However, there are several differences between them that may influence your choice when deciding which one to use.

Data Querying and Manipulation: Objection.js uses a query builder approach, where queries are constructed using a chainable API. This allows for more flexibility and customization in writing complex queries. On the other hand, TypeORM provides a more declarative approach, allowing you to define your models using decorators and use simple CRUD operations for querying and manipulating data.
Database Support: Objection.js supports a wide range of databases, including PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite, and Oracle. It also provides advanced features like advanced JSON querying and transaction handling. TypeORM, on the other hand, supports a similar set of databases but also includes support for MongoDB, MongoDB replica set, and CockroachDB. It provides features like automatic database schema migrations and advanced data types.
Integration with Frameworks: Objection.js is tightly integrated with the Express.js framework, making it more suitable for building web applications using Express.js. It provides middleware functions to automatically fetch and persist relational data. In contrast, TypeORM is a standalone library that can be used with any JavaScript framework or runtime environment.
Performance: Objection.js is known for its performance and efficiency, especially when dealing with complex queries and large datasets. It provides advanced query optimization techniques and lazy loading of related data. TypeORM also provides good performance but may not be as optimized for extreme scenarios.
Ease of Use and Learning Curve: Objection.js has a steeper learning curve compared to TypeORM, as it requires understanding the query builder syntax and some advanced concepts like model relations and query chaining. TypeORM, on the other hand, provides a simpler and more intuitive API, making it easier to get started and work with for beginners.
Community and Support: Both Objection.js and TypeORM have active communities and offer good documentation and support. Objection.js has been around for a longer time and has a larger community. It also has a well-maintained repository and regular updates. TypeORM, being a newer library, is rapidly gaining popularity and has an active community.

In Summary, Objection.js and TypeORM differ in their approach to data querying and manipulation, database support, integration with frameworks, performance, ease of use, and community support. Depending on your specific requirements and familiarity with different concepts, you can choose the library that suits your needs best.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Objection.js	TypeORM
It aims to stay out of your way and make it as easy as possible to use the full power of SQL and the underlying database engine while still making the common stuff easy and enjoyable.	It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.
A declarative way of defining models and relationships between them; Simple and fun way to fetch, insert, update and delete objects using the full power of SQL; Powerful mechanisms for eager loading, inserting and upserting object graphs; A way to store complex documents as single rows Completely Promise based API; Easy to use transactions; Optional JSON schema validation	automatically create the database table schemes based on your models; transparently insert / update / delete to the database your objects; map your selections from tables to JavaScript objects and map table columns to object properties; easily create one-to-one, many-to-one, one-to-many and many-to-many relations between tables; and much more.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 7.3K	GitHub Stars 36.0K
GitHub Forks 641	GitHub Forks 6.5K
Stacks 38	Stacks 757
Followers 67	Followers 813
Votes 0	Votes 81
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 30 Typescript 12 Supports MySQL, PostgreSQL, MariaDB, SQLite, MS SQL Ser 9 Cons of TypeORM 9 Easy setup 7 Works in NodeJS, Browser, Ionic, Cordova and Electron p Cons 5 Completely abandoned by its creator 3 Too complex for what it does 2 Doesn't really support native javascript 1 Cannot use query on any relation 1 Not proper/real type safety
Integrations
MySQL Node.js PostgreSQL SQLite	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Objection.js, TypeORM?

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Sequelize

Sequelize is a promise-based ORM for Node.js and io.js. It supports the dialects PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQLite and MSSQL and features solid transaction support, relations, read replication and more.

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

Related Comparisons

Objection.js vs TypeORM: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Data Querying and Manipulation: Objection.js uses a query builder approach, where queries are constructed using a chainable API. This allows for more flexibility and customization in writing complex queries. On the other hand, TypeORM provides a more declarative approach, allowing you to define your models using decorators and use simple CRUD operations for querying and manipulating data.
Database Support: Objection.js supports a wide range of databases, including PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite, and Oracle. It also provides advanced features like advanced JSON querying and transaction handling. TypeORM, on the other hand, supports a similar set of databases but also includes support for MongoDB, MongoDB replica set, and CockroachDB. It provides features like automatic database schema migrations and advanced data types.
Integration with Frameworks: Objection.js is tightly integrated with the Express.js framework, making it more suitable for building web applications using Express.js. It provides middleware functions to automatically fetch and persist relational data. In contrast, TypeORM is a standalone library that can be used with any JavaScript framework or runtime environment.
Performance: Objection.js is known for its performance and efficiency, especially when dealing with complex queries and large datasets. It provides advanced query optimization techniques and lazy loading of related data. TypeORM also provides good performance but may not be as optimized for extreme scenarios.
Ease of Use and Learning Curve: Objection.js has a steeper learning curve compared to TypeORM, as it requires understanding the query builder syntax and some advanced concepts like model relations and query chaining. TypeORM, on the other hand, provides a simpler and more intuitive API, making it easier to get started and work with for beginners.
Community and Support: Both Objection.js and TypeORM have active communities and offer good documentation and support. Objection.js has been around for a longer time and has a larger community. It also has a well-maintained repository and regular updates. TypeORM, being a newer library, is rapidly gaining popularity and has an active community.

Objection.js vs TypeORM

Overview