OpenAPI Specification vs Rest.li

Overview

Rest.li

Stacks14

Followers39

Votes0

GitHub Stars2.5K

Forks556

OpenAPI Specification

Stacks267

Followers146

Votes10

OpenAPI Specification vs Rest.li: What are the differences?

Data Modeling Approach: One key difference between OpenAPI Specification and Rest.li is the data modeling approach. OpenAPI Specification uses JSON Schema for data modeling, allowing for detailed descriptions of data structures, while Rest.li uses Pegasus schema for defining data models, which provides additional capabilities such as type checking and serialization.
API Documentation Format: Another distinguishing factor is the API documentation format. OpenAPI Specification uses Swagger UI for generating interactive API documentation, providing a user-friendly interface for exploring and testing APIs. In contrast, Rest.li's documentation is usually generated using R2Doc, offering a more structured and document-centric approach.
Client Library Support: OpenAPI Specification has extensive support for client libraries in various programming languages, making it easier for developers to consume APIs. On the other hand, Rest.li has a more limited range of client libraries available, focusing primarily on Java and JavaScript implementations.
Protocol Support: OpenAPI Specification supports a wide range of protocols, including HTTP, HTTPS, and WebSocket, providing flexibility in communication options. In comparison, Rest.li is specifically designed for RESTful APIs over HTTP, limiting the protocol choices but ensuring a standardized approach to API development.
Community and Ecosystem: The OpenAPI Specification has a larger community and ecosystem, with a wide range of tools, extensions, and resources available to support API development. Rest.li, while backed by LinkedIn, has a smaller community and fewer resources dedicated to its ecosystem, limiting the scope of additional features and support available.
Versioning and Compatibility: OpenAPI Specification offers built-in support for versioning and backward compatibility, with features such as semantic versioning and deprecation mechanisms. Rest.li also supports versioning but requires additional implementation strategies to ensure compatibility across different versions of the API.

In Summary, the key differences between OpenAPI Specification and Rest.li lie in their data modeling approaches, API documentation formats, client library support, protocol capabilities, community ecosystems, and versioning mechanisms.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Rest.li	OpenAPI Specification
Rest.li is an open source REST framework for building robust, scalable RESTful architectures using type-safe bindings and asynchronous, non-blocking IO. Rest.li fills a niche for applying RESTful principals at scale with an end-to-end developer workflow for buildings REST APIs that promotes clean REST practices, uniform interface design and consistent data modeling.	It defines a standard, language-agnostic interface to RESTful APIs which allows both humans and computers to discover and understand the capabilities of the service without access to source code, documentation, or through network traffic inspection.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 2.5K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 556	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 14	Stacks 267
Followers 39	Followers 146
Votes 0	Votes 10
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 5 API Documentation 5 API Specification

What are some alternatives to Rest.li, OpenAPI Specification?

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Hoppscotch

It is a free, fast and beautiful API request builder. It helps you create requests faster, saving precious time on development

Falcor

Falcor lets you represent all your remote data sources as a single domain model via a virtual JSON graph. You code the same way no matter where the data is, whether in memory on the client or over the network on the server.

Related Comparisons

OpenAPI Specification vs Rest.li: What are the differences?

Data Modeling Approach: One key difference between OpenAPI Specification and Rest.li is the data modeling approach. OpenAPI Specification uses JSON Schema for data modeling, allowing for detailed descriptions of data structures, while Rest.li uses Pegasus schema for defining data models, which provides additional capabilities such as type checking and serialization.
API Documentation Format: Another distinguishing factor is the API documentation format. OpenAPI Specification uses Swagger UI for generating interactive API documentation, providing a user-friendly interface for exploring and testing APIs. In contrast, Rest.li's documentation is usually generated using R2Doc, offering a more structured and document-centric approach.
Client Library Support: OpenAPI Specification has extensive support for client libraries in various programming languages, making it easier for developers to consume APIs. On the other hand, Rest.li has a more limited range of client libraries available, focusing primarily on Java and JavaScript implementations.
Protocol Support: OpenAPI Specification supports a wide range of protocols, including HTTP, HTTPS, and WebSocket, providing flexibility in communication options. In comparison, Rest.li is specifically designed for RESTful APIs over HTTP, limiting the protocol choices but ensuring a standardized approach to API development.
Community and Ecosystem: The OpenAPI Specification has a larger community and ecosystem, with a wide range of tools, extensions, and resources available to support API development. Rest.li, while backed by LinkedIn, has a smaller community and fewer resources dedicated to its ecosystem, limiting the scope of additional features and support available.
Versioning and Compatibility: OpenAPI Specification offers built-in support for versioning and backward compatibility, with features such as semantic versioning and deprecation mechanisms. Rest.li also supports versioning but requires additional implementation strategies to ensure compatibility across different versions of the API.

OpenAPI Specification vs Rest.li

Overview