OpenNMS vs Zabbix

Overview

Zabbix

Stacks684

Followers981

Votes66

GitHub Stars5.3K

Forks1.1K

OpenNMS

Stacks2

Followers9

Votes0

OpenNMS vs Zabbix: What are the differences?

Introduction

OpenNMS and Zabbix are both popular network monitoring tools used by organizations to monitor and manage their network infrastructure. While they share common functionalities, there are several key differences between the two. In this article, we will explore and outline these differences.

Architecture: OpenNMS follows a horizontally scalable architecture, allowing for distributed monitoring across multiple servers. On the other hand, Zabbix follows a centralized architecture where all data is processed and stored on a single server. This makes OpenNMS more suitable for large-scale environments that require high scalability.
Flexibility: OpenNMS offers a highly customizable and extensible platform, allowing users to tailor the monitoring system according to their specific needs. It provides a robust event-driven architecture and supports the integration of custom scripts and external applications. Zabbix, while still flexible, has a more standardized approach, offering a narrower range of customization options compared to OpenNMS.
Ease of Installation and Configuration: Zabbix provides a simpler installation and configuration process, making it easier for beginners to set up and start monitoring their network quickly. In contrast, OpenNMS has a slightly more complex installation and configuration process, requiring more advanced technical knowledge. However, this complexity allows for more advanced configurations and customization options.
Alerting and Notification: OpenNMS offers more advanced alerting and notification capabilities compared to Zabbix. It provides flexible and customizable rules for triggering alerts based on various criteria, supports multiple notification methods (such as email, SMS, and SNMP traps), and allows for escalation and acknowledgement of alerts. Zabbix, while also providing alerting and notification features, has a less sophisticated rule engine and limited notification methods.
Supported Technologies: OpenNMS is known for its extensive support for a wide range of technologies and protocols, including SNMP, WMI, JMX, and Netflow, making it suitable for monitoring diverse network environments. Zabbix, while also supporting these technologies, has a more limited set of supported protocols and may require additional configuration for certain advanced features.
Community and Support: OpenNMS has a strong and active open-source community, providing regular updates, bug fixes, and community-driven plugins. It has a dedicated support team and offers both community and commercial support options. Zabbix, while also having an active community, has a more commercially driven support structure, with the majority of updates and support provided through commercial subscriptions.

In Summary, OpenNMS and Zabbix differ in architecture, flexibility, ease of installation and configuration, alerting and notification capabilities, supported technologies, and community and support structures. These differences make each tool more suitable for specific use cases, depending on the organization's requirements and technical expertise.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Zabbix, OpenNMS

vivek

Jun 8, 2020

Needs adviceon

Centreon

Zabbix

Datadog

My team is divided on using Centreon or Zabbix for enterprise monitoring and alert automation. Can someone let us know which one is better? There is one more tool called Datadog that we are using for cloud assets. Of course, Datadog presents us with huge bills. So we want to have a comparative study. Suggestions and advice are welcome. Thanks!

796k views796k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Zabbix	OpenNMS
Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.	The world's first enterprise-grade network management platform developed under the Open Source model
Smart, Highly Automated Metric Collection; Advanced Problem Detection; Intelligent Alerting and Remediation	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 5.3K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 1.1K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 684	Stacks 2
Followers 981	Followers 9
Votes 66	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 21 Free 9 Alerts 5 Service/node/network discovery 5 Templates 4 Base metrics from the box Cons 5 The UI is in PHP 2 Puppet module is sluggish	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Slack Jira PagerDuty Grafana Ansible Skype Chef Bugzilla HipChat ServiceNow.com	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Zabbix, OpenNMS?

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

StatsD

It is a network daemon that runs on the Node.js platform and listens for statistics, like counters and timers, sent over UDP or TCP and sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services (e.g., Graphite).

Jaeger

Jaeger, a Distributed Tracing System

Related Comparisons

OpenNMS vs Zabbix: What are the differences?

Introduction

Architecture: OpenNMS follows a horizontally scalable architecture, allowing for distributed monitoring across multiple servers. On the other hand, Zabbix follows a centralized architecture where all data is processed and stored on a single server. This makes OpenNMS more suitable for large-scale environments that require high scalability.
Flexibility: OpenNMS offers a highly customizable and extensible platform, allowing users to tailor the monitoring system according to their specific needs. It provides a robust event-driven architecture and supports the integration of custom scripts and external applications. Zabbix, while still flexible, has a more standardized approach, offering a narrower range of customization options compared to OpenNMS.
Ease of Installation and Configuration: Zabbix provides a simpler installation and configuration process, making it easier for beginners to set up and start monitoring their network quickly. In contrast, OpenNMS has a slightly more complex installation and configuration process, requiring more advanced technical knowledge. However, this complexity allows for more advanced configurations and customization options.
Alerting and Notification: OpenNMS offers more advanced alerting and notification capabilities compared to Zabbix. It provides flexible and customizable rules for triggering alerts based on various criteria, supports multiple notification methods (such as email, SMS, and SNMP traps), and allows for escalation and acknowledgement of alerts. Zabbix, while also providing alerting and notification features, has a less sophisticated rule engine and limited notification methods.
Supported Technologies: OpenNMS is known for its extensive support for a wide range of technologies and protocols, including SNMP, WMI, JMX, and Netflow, making it suitable for monitoring diverse network environments. Zabbix, while also supporting these technologies, has a more limited set of supported protocols and may require additional configuration for certain advanced features.
Community and Support: OpenNMS has a strong and active open-source community, providing regular updates, bug fixes, and community-driven plugins. It has a dedicated support team and offers both community and commercial support options. Zabbix, while also having an active community, has a more commercially driven support structure, with the majority of updates and support provided through commercial subscriptions.

OpenNMS vs Zabbix

Overview

OpenNMS vs Zabbix: What are the differences?