Pantheon vs Platform.sh

Overview

Pantheon

Stacks55

Followers60

Votes3

Platform.sh

Stacks19

Followers58

Votes0

Pantheon vs Platform.sh: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Here is a comparison between Pantheon and Platform.sh - two popular website hosting platforms. Below are the key differences between the two platforms.

Scalability: Pantheon offers auto-scaling, which automatically adjusts server resources based on website traffic. Platform.sh, on the other hand, has built-in horizontal scalability, allowing the platform to scale based on specific configuration settings and traffic patterns.
Git Integration: Pantheon has tighter integration with Git, providing a seamless workflow for developers to push their code changes to the platform directly from their Git repository. Platform.sh also integrates with Git, but it takes a different approach by using branches and tags to define environments, making it easier to manage multiple environments for different development stages.
Deployment Process: Pantheon uses a one-click deployment process, allowing developers to easily deploy code changes to their website without any manual steps. Platform.sh, however, uses a continuous integration and deployment (CI/CD) approach, where every change made in the code repository triggers an automated build and deployment process.
Infrastructure Management: Pantheon manages the underlying infrastructure for websites hosted on their platform, including server setup, maintenance, and security updates. On the other hand, Platform.sh leverages infrastructure management tools like Docker and Kubernetes, providing developers with more control over the configuration and scalability of their infrastructure.
Multisite Support: Pantheon offers built-in support for hosting multiple websites under a single account, making it easier for developers to manage multiple projects. Platform.sh, on the other hand, primarily focuses on providing a platform for individual projects and may require additional setup and configuration for hosting multiple websites.
Platform Features: Pantheon offers a wide range of platform features, including built-in caching, content delivery network (CDN) integration, and staging environments. Platform.sh, on the other hand, focuses more on providing the development workflow and infrastructure, with flexibility to integrate different services and tools based on project requirements.

In Summary, Pantheon and Platform.sh differ in their scalability options, git integration, deployment process, infrastructure management, multisite support, and platform features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Pantheon	Platform.sh
Stop struggling with version control, staging environments, backups, and workflow. Pantheon makes best practices easy. It’s 100% free for developers.	It is a Continuous Deployment Platform as a Service powered by a high-availability grid of micro-containers. Support any PHP and NodeJS applications with deep integration for Drupal and Symfony.
“Git push to deploy,” a continuous integration workflow;One-click core updates, Git, Drush, Varnish, Redis, automated backups;Automated Drupal and WordPress updates;Scale in seconds through the Pantheon run-time matrix;Expert Drupal and WordPress Support	Drop in your applications, as-is; Easily add and manage services; Clone instantly; Iterate on your terms; Deploy at scale, anywhere
Statistics
Stacks 55	Stacks 19
Followers 60	Followers 58
Votes 3	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 1 Wonderful platform, people fast and secure this can be 1 One of the most fast hosting platforms out there 1 Quality customer service	No community feedback yet
Integrations
WordPress Drupal	Drupal Node.js Laravel WordPress PHP Magento Golang Java Python Ruby

What are some alternatives to Pantheon, Platform.sh?

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Medium

Medium is a different kind of place on the internet. A place where the measure of success isn’t views, but viewpoints. Where the quality of the idea matters, not the author’s qualifications. A place where conversation pushes ideas forward.

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Tumblr

Tumblr is a feature rich and free blog hosting platform offering professional and fully customizable templates, bookmarklets, photos, mobile apps, and social network. The site now ranks as the 11th-largest in terms of traffic, according to Quantcast, with 170 million monthly visitors globally.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

Pantheon vs Platform.sh: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Here is a comparison between Pantheon and Platform.sh - two popular website hosting platforms. Below are the key differences between the two platforms.

Scalability: Pantheon offers auto-scaling, which automatically adjusts server resources based on website traffic. Platform.sh, on the other hand, has built-in horizontal scalability, allowing the platform to scale based on specific configuration settings and traffic patterns.
Git Integration: Pantheon has tighter integration with Git, providing a seamless workflow for developers to push their code changes to the platform directly from their Git repository. Platform.sh also integrates with Git, but it takes a different approach by using branches and tags to define environments, making it easier to manage multiple environments for different development stages.
Deployment Process: Pantheon uses a one-click deployment process, allowing developers to easily deploy code changes to their website without any manual steps. Platform.sh, however, uses a continuous integration and deployment (CI/CD) approach, where every change made in the code repository triggers an automated build and deployment process.
Infrastructure Management: Pantheon manages the underlying infrastructure for websites hosted on their platform, including server setup, maintenance, and security updates. On the other hand, Platform.sh leverages infrastructure management tools like Docker and Kubernetes, providing developers with more control over the configuration and scalability of their infrastructure.
Multisite Support: Pantheon offers built-in support for hosting multiple websites under a single account, making it easier for developers to manage multiple projects. Platform.sh, on the other hand, primarily focuses on providing a platform for individual projects and may require additional setup and configuration for hosting multiple websites.
Platform Features: Pantheon offers a wide range of platform features, including built-in caching, content delivery network (CDN) integration, and staging environments. Platform.sh, on the other hand, focuses more on providing the development workflow and infrastructure, with flexibility to integrate different services and tools based on project requirements.

In Summary, Pantheon and Platform.sh differ in their scalability options, git integration, deployment process, infrastructure management, multisite support, and platform features.