Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Paw vs Rest.li: What are the differences?
Paw: The ultimate REST client for Mac. Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code; Rest.li: A REST+JSON framework for robust, scalable service architectures, by LinkedIn. Rest.li is an open source REST framework for building robust, scalable RESTful architectures using type-safe bindings and asynchronous, non-blocking IO. Rest.li fills a niche for applying RESTful principals at scale with an end-to-end developer workflow for buildings REST APIs that promotes clean REST practices, uniform interface design and consistent data modeling.
Paw and Rest.li belong to "API Tools" category of the tech stack.
Rest.li is an open source tool with 1.94K GitHub stars and 392 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Rest.li's open source repository on GitHub.
Pros of Paw
- Great interface46
- Easy to use37
- More stable and performant than the others25
- Saves endpoints list for testing16
- Supports environment variables13
- Integrations12
- Multi-Dimension Environment Settings9
- Paste curl commands into Paw4
- Creates code for any language or framework2
Pros of Rest.li
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Paw
- It's not free3
- MacOS Only2