Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Paw
Paw

130
131
+ 1
146
WSO2
WSO2

10
11
+ 1
0
Add tool

Paw vs WSO2: What are the differences?

What is Paw? The ultimate REST client for Mac. Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

What is WSO2? A comprehensive middleware platform that is open source with no gimmicks. It delivers the only complete open source middleware platform. With its revolutionary componentized design, it is also the only open source platform-as-a-service for private and public clouds available today. With it, seamless migration and integration between servers, private clouds, and public clouds is now a reality.

Paw and WSO2 can be categorized as "API" tools.

Some of the features offered by Paw are:

  • Organize your Requests, make Groups or sort by Host, Name, etc.
  • Easily build your requests, enjoy Formatters and Dynamic Values.
  • See Request and Response infos, headers, and body.

On the other hand, WSO2 provides the following key features:

  • 100% Open Source
  • Largest Platform Built on Single Code Base
  • Cloud Enabled

WSO2 is an open source tool with 321 GitHub stars and 460 GitHub forks. Here's a link to WSO2's open source repository on GitHub.

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Paw?

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

What is WSO2?

It delivers the only complete open source middleware platform. With its revolutionary componentized design, it is also the only open source platform-as-a-service for private and public clouds available today. With it, seamless migration and integration between servers, private clouds, and public clouds is now a reality.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Paw?
Why do developers choose WSO2?
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

      Be the first to leave a con
      What companies use Paw?
      What companies use WSO2?

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Paw?
      What tools integrate with WSO2?
        No integrations found
        What are some alternatives to Paw and WSO2?
        Postman
        It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.
        Amazon API Gateway
        Amazon API Gateway handles all the tasks involved in accepting and processing up to hundreds of thousands of concurrent API calls, including traffic management, authorization and access control, monitoring, and API version management.
        Insomnia REST Client
        Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.
        Runscope
        Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.
        RAML
        RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.
        See all alternatives
        Decisions about Paw and WSO2
        Jason Barry
        Jason Barry
        Cofounder at FeaturePeek | 4 upvotes 43.2K views
        atFeaturePeekFeaturePeek
        Dropbox
        Dropbox
        Paw
        Paw
        Postman
        Postman
        Insomnia REST Client
        Insomnia REST Client

        We've tried a couple REST clients over the years, and Insomnia REST Client has won us over the most. Here's what we like about it compared to other contenders in this category:

        • Uncluttered UI. Things are only in your face when you need them, and the app is visually organized in an intuitive manner.
        • Native Mac app. We wanted the look and feel to be on par with other apps in our OS rather than a web app / Electron app (cough Postman).
        • Easy team sync. Other apps have this too, but Insomnia's model best sets the "set and forget" mentality. Syncs are near instant and I'm always assured that I'm working on the latest version of API endpoints. Apps like Paw use a git-based approach to revision history, but I think this actually over-complicates the sync feature. For ensuring I'm always working on the latest version of something, I'd rather have the sync model be closer to Dropbox's than git's, and Insomnia is closer to Dropbox in that regard.

        Some features like automatic public-facing documentation aren't supported, but we currently don't have any public APIs, so this didn't matter to us.

        See more
        Interest over time
        Reviews of Paw and WSO2
        No reviews found
        How developers use Paw and WSO2
        Avatar of Jack Littleton
        Jack Littleton uses PawPaw

        Paw allows me to interface with an API prior to starting UI work that requires the API. This helps me understand what data is required to be sent to the API, and what to expect back.

        In cases where I develop the API, Paw helps me to test as I'm developing, ensuring changes I make aren't breaking other parts of the API.

        How much does Paw cost?
        How much does WSO2 cost?
        Pricing unavailable
        Pricing unavailable
        News about WSO2
        More news