StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Static Site Generators
  5. Phenomic vs Wintersmith

Phenomic vs Wintersmith

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Wintersmith
Wintersmith
Stacks7
Followers12
Votes1
GitHub Stars3.5K
Forks327
Phenomic
Phenomic
Stacks4
Followers7
Votes0

Phenomic vs Wintersmith: What are the differences?

Phenomic vs Wintersmith

Write Introduction here

1. **Template Language**: Phenomic uses React and JSX for templating, providing powerful flexibility and reusability through component-based structures. In contrast, Wintersmith employs a simpler template system using Markdown and HTML, which might be easier for users familiar with these languages.

2. **Community Support**: Phenomic has a vibrant community of React developers who actively contribute to its development and provide extensive documentation and support. On the other hand, Wintersmith has a smaller community, which may result in fewer resources and plugins available for users.

3. **Data Handling**: Phenomic offers built-in support for managing data through APIs, allowing users to fetch and manipulate data easily within their projects. In contrast, Wintersmith requires users to rely on plugins or custom scripts for data handling, which can be more complex and time-consuming.

4. **Plugin Ecosystem**: Phenomic has a robust plugin ecosystem that extends its functionality and allows users to customize their projects extensively. Wintersmith, while also supporting plugins, may have a more limited selection due to its smaller community and user base.

5. **Build Time Performance**: Phenomic utilizes webpack for bundling and optimizing assets, resulting in faster build times and improved performance for large-scale projects. Wintersmith's build process may be slower in comparison, especially for projects with a significant amount of content or data to process.

6. **Ease of Learning Curve**: Phenomic's use of React and JSX may have a steeper learning curve for beginners or users unfamiliar with these technologies. In contrast, Wintersmith's simpler template system and straightforward configuration make it more accessible and easier to learn for novice users. 

In Summary, Phenomic and Wintersmith differ in template language, community support, data handling, plugin ecosystem, build time performance, and ease of learning curve.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Wintersmith
Wintersmith
Phenomic
Phenomic

Wintersmith is a simple yet flexible static site generator. It takes contents (markdown, less, scripts, etc), transforms them using plugins and outputs a static website (html, css, images, etc) that you can host anywhere.

It is a modular website compiler that helps you to build static websites, with a modern approach: you will make your website the same way you build an app

Flexible - Wintersmith tries not to put any limitations on how you work with your content. You can transform it using plugins and structure it as you please.;Templating - Use your favorite templating engine, it comes bundled with a Jade plugin and there is community made plugins for most other node.js templating engines.; Markdown - No more fiddling around with WYSIWYG editors. Once you start using Markdown to author your content you'll never look back!;More than blogging- Write web applications using the latest technologies without having to host your own node.js servers, or use it to increase speeds on large-scale sites.
A static site generator like no other; A website built with things you like; A static website, 100% SEO friendly; A website with lightning fast UX
Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.5K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
327
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
7
Stacks
4
Followers
12
Followers
7
Votes
1
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Easy setup
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Markdown
Markdown
TypeScript
TypeScript
JavaScript
JavaScript
ES6
ES6
WordPress
WordPress
React
React
Webpack
Webpack
Google Analytics
Google Analytics

What are some alternatives to Wintersmith, Phenomic?

Jekyll

Jekyll

Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories.

Hugo

Hugo

Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.

Gatsby

Gatsby

Gatsby lets you build blazing fast sites with your data, whatever the source. Liberate your sites from legacy CMSs and fly into the future.

Hexo

Hexo

Hexo is a fast, simple and powerful blog framework. It parses your posts with Markdown or other render engine and generates static files with the beautiful theme. All of these just take seconds.

Middleman

Middleman

Middleman is a command-line tool for creating static websites using all the shortcuts and tools of the modern web development environment.

Gridsome

Gridsome

Build websites using latest web tech tools that developers love - Vue.js, GraphQL and Webpack. Get hot-reloading and all the power of Node.js. Gridsome makes building websites fun again.

Pelican

Pelican

Pelican is a static site generator that supports Markdown and reST syntax. Write your weblog entries directly with your editor of choice (vim!) in reStructuredText or Markdown.

DocPad

DocPad

Empower your website frontends with layouts, meta-data, pre-processors (markdown, jade, coffeescript, etc.), partials, skeletons, file watching, querying, and an amazing plugin system. DocPad will streamline your web development process allowing you to craft full-featured websites quicker than ever before.

Metalsmith

Metalsmith

In Metalsmith, all of the logic is handled by plugins. You simply chain them together. Since everything is a plugin, the core library is actually just an abstraction for manipulating a directory of files.

11ty

11ty

A simpler static site generator. An alternative to Jekyll. Written in JavaScript. Transforms a directory of templates (of varying types) into HTML. Works with HTML, Markdown, Liquid, Nunjucks, Handlebars, Mustache, EJS, Haml, Pug, and JavaScript Template Literals.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope