Plastic SCM vs SourceTree

Overview

SourceTree

Stacks10.6K

Followers8.1K

Votes727

Plastic SCM

Stacks40

Followers75

Votes17

Plastic SCM vs SourceTree: What are the differences?

Introduction

Plastic SCM and SourceTree are both popular version control systems used in software development. However, there are several key differences between the two that set them apart in terms of features and functionality.

User Interface: Plastic SCM offers a sleek and modern user interface with customizable panels and a sidebar that provides easy access to various commands and functionalities. On the other hand, SourceTree has a more simplistic interface with a single window layout and a sidebar that includes quick filters for quick navigation.
Platform Compatibility: Plastic SCM is compatible with Windows, Linux, and macOS operating systems, offering users flexibility in choosing their preferred platform. In contrast, SourceTree primarily focuses on Windows and macOS, making it more limited in terms of platform compatibility.
Branching and Merging: Plastic SCM provides users with powerful branching and merging capabilities, allowing for easy management of code branches and efficient merging of changes. SourceTree also supports branching and merging but may not offer the same level of sophistication and customization as Plastic SCM.
Collaboration and Integration: Plastic SCM offers seamless collaboration and integration with popular project management tools such as JIRA and Trello, enabling teams to efficiently track and manage their development workflow. SourceTree also supports integration with JIRA but may not provide the same level of integration options as Plastic SCM.
Performance and Scalability: Plastic SCM is known for its robust performance and scalability, allowing for efficient handling of large repositories and team collaboration. SourceTree may have limitations when it comes to large-scale projects and may experience performance issues in such scenarios.
Advanced Version Control Features: Plastic SCM offers advanced version control features such as semantic diff, cherry picking, and distributed development, which provide users with enhanced control and flexibility over their codebase. SourceTree may lack these advanced features, focusing more on providing a simplified version control experience.

In summary, Plastic SCM and SourceTree differ in their user interface, platform compatibility, branching and merging capabilities, collaboration and integration options, performance and scalability, and advanced version control features. These differences make each tool suitable for different use cases and development environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on SourceTree, Plastic SCM

Stefan

Jan 19, 2020

Decided

I explored many Git Desktop tools for the Mac and my final decision was to use Fork. What I love about for that it contains three features, I like about a Git Client tool.

It allows

to handle day to day git operations (least important for me as I am cli junkie)
it helps to investigate the history
most important of all, it has a repo manager which many other tools are missing.

198k views198k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

SourceTree	Plastic SCM
Use the full capability of Git and Mercurial in the SourceTree desktop app. Manage all your repositories, hosted or local, through SourceTree's simple interface.	Plastic SCM is a distributed version control designed for big projects. It excels on branching and merging, graphical user interfaces, and can also deal with large files and even file-locking (great for game devs). It includes "semantic" features like refactor detection to ease diffing complex refactors.
Full-powered DVCS;Create, clone, commit, push, pull, merge, and more are all just a click away.;Review your outgoing and incoming changesets, cherry-pick between branches, patch handling, rebase, stash, shelve, and much more.;Use Git-flow and Hg-flow with ease. Keep your repositories cleaner and your development more efficient with SourceTree's intuitive interface to Git and Hg's 'branchy' development model.	Distributed version control system;Branch Explorer;Semantic Version Control;Locking;Huge files;Big projects;GitSync;Super strong merging;Partial replica;ACL security;Database backends
Statistics
Stacks 10.6K	Stacks 40
Followers 8.1K	Followers 75
Votes 727	Votes 17
Pros & Cons
Pros 205 Visual history and branch view 164 Beautiful UI 134 Easy repository browsing 87 Gitflow support 75 Interactive stage or discard by hunks or lines Cons 12 Crashes often 8 So many bugs 7 Fetching is slow sometimes 5 No dark theme (Windows) 5 Very unstable	Pros 8 Wanna do Branch per Task Dev? Plastic rocks it 4 No Size limite 2 Simple, easy to use interfaces. Resilient and solid 2 File Locking 1 Very fast Cons 1 Can't place windows next to each other to save space 1 Keyboard shortcuts are lacking 1 Adds files with only changed timestamp to pending 1 Always uses automatic conflict resolution first 1 Doesn't have file staging
Integrations
GitHub Git Bitbucket Windows macOS Mercurial	Gluon TeamCity Jenkins Visual Studio Code Visual Studio

What are some alternatives to SourceTree, Plastic SCM?

Git

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.

GitKraken

The downright luxurious Git client for Windows, Mac and Linux. Cross-platform, 100% standalone, and free.

Fork

Manage your repositories without leaving the application. Organize the repositores into categories. Fork's Diff Viewer provides a clear view to spot the changes in your source code quickly.

Mercurial

Mercurial is dedicated to speed and efficiency with a sane user interface. It is written in Python. Mercurial's implementation and data structures are designed to be fast. You can generate diffs between revisions, or jump back in time within seconds.

Tower

Use all of Git's powerful feature set - in a GUI that makes you more productive.

Sublime Merge

A snappy UI, three-way merge tool, side-by-side diffs, syntax highlighting, and more. Evaluate for free – no account, tracking, or time limits.

SVN (Subversion)

Subversion exists to be universally recognized and adopted as an open-source, centralized version control system characterized by its reliability as a safe haven for valuable data; the simplicity of its model and usage; and its ability to support the needs of a wide variety of users and projects, from individuals to large-scale enterprise operations.

GitUp

GitUp lets you see your entire labyrinth of branches and merges with perfect clarity. Any change you make, large or small, even outside GitUp, is immediately reflected in GitUp's graph. No refreshing, no waiting.

Pijul

Pijul is a free and open source (AGPL 3) distributed version control system. Its distinctive feature is to be based on a sound theory of patches, which makes it easy to learn and use, and really distributed.

DVC

It is an open-source Version Control System for data science and machine learning projects. It is designed to handle large files, data sets, machine learning models, and metrics as well as code.

Related Comparisons

Plastic SCM vs SourceTree: What are the differences?

Introduction

User Interface: Plastic SCM offers a sleek and modern user interface with customizable panels and a sidebar that provides easy access to various commands and functionalities. On the other hand, SourceTree has a more simplistic interface with a single window layout and a sidebar that includes quick filters for quick navigation.
Platform Compatibility: Plastic SCM is compatible with Windows, Linux, and macOS operating systems, offering users flexibility in choosing their preferred platform. In contrast, SourceTree primarily focuses on Windows and macOS, making it more limited in terms of platform compatibility.
Branching and Merging: Plastic SCM provides users with powerful branching and merging capabilities, allowing for easy management of code branches and efficient merging of changes. SourceTree also supports branching and merging but may not offer the same level of sophistication and customization as Plastic SCM.
Collaboration and Integration: Plastic SCM offers seamless collaboration and integration with popular project management tools such as JIRA and Trello, enabling teams to efficiently track and manage their development workflow. SourceTree also supports integration with JIRA but may not provide the same level of integration options as Plastic SCM.
Performance and Scalability: Plastic SCM is known for its robust performance and scalability, allowing for efficient handling of large repositories and team collaboration. SourceTree may have limitations when it comes to large-scale projects and may experience performance issues in such scenarios.
Advanced Version Control Features: Plastic SCM offers advanced version control features such as semantic diff, cherry picking, and distributed development, which provide users with enhanced control and flexibility over their codebase. SourceTree may lack these advanced features, focusing more on providing a simplified version control experience.

Plastic SCM vs SourceTree

Overview

Plastic SCM vs SourceTree: What are the differences?