StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Platform.sh vs PythonAnywhere

Platform.sh vs PythonAnywhere

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

PythonAnywhere
PythonAnywhere
Stacks90
Followers293
Votes64
Platform.sh
Platform.sh
Stacks19
Followers58
Votes0

Platform.sh vs PythonAnywhere: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this comparison, we will analyze the key differences between Platform.sh and PythonAnywhere.

1. Programming Languages and Frameworks Supported: Platform.sh supports a wide range of programming languages and frameworks including PHP, Node.js, Python, Java, Ruby, Go, and more, catering to diverse development needs. On the other hand, PythonAnywhere specifically focuses on Python web applications and does not offer support for other programming languages out of the box.

2. Scalability and Flexibility: Platform.sh is built for scalability, allowing users to easily scale their infrastructure based on the demand of their applications. It provides a container-based architecture that simplifies scaling and deployment. PythonAnywhere, while user-friendly for Python beginners and small projects, lacks the same level of scalability and flexibility compared to Platform.sh.

3. Deployment Options: Platform.sh offers a seamless deployment process with continuous integration and deployment features integrated into its platform, making it easy for developers to push changes to their applications. PythonAnywhere, on the other hand, does not provide the same level of automated deployment options, requiring users to manage deployment manually.

4. Pricing Structure: Platform.sh follows a pricing model based on resource consumption and offers different plans tailored to the specific needs of developers and businesses. PythonAnywhere, on the other hand, provides a freemium model with limited resources and functionalities for free users, with paid plans offering additional features and resources.

5. Management and Monitoring Tools: Platform.sh comes with built-in management and monitoring tools that allow users to track the performance of their applications, monitor resource usage, and manage configurations easily. PythonAnywhere lacks comprehensive management and monitoring tools, making it challenging for users to have deep insights into their applications' performance.

6. Customization and Integration: Platform.sh provides extensive integration with third-party services and tools, allowing users to customize their development environment and workflow according to their requirements. In contrast, PythonAnywhere has limited options for customization and integration with external services, which might restrict users looking for a more flexible and customizable development environment.

In Summary, Platform.sh offers a versatile and scalable solution with support for multiple programming languages and advanced deployment features, while PythonAnywhere is more specialized towards Python development and lacks the scalability and flexibility of Platform.sh.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

PythonAnywhere
PythonAnywhere
Platform.sh
Platform.sh

It's somewhat unique. A small PaaS that supports web apps (Python only) as well as scheduled jobs with shell access. It is an expensive way to tinker and run several small apps.

It is a Continuous Deployment Platform as a Service powered by a high-availability grid of micro-containers. Support any PHP and NodeJS applications with deep integration for Drupal and Symfony.

-
Drop in your applications, as-is; Easily add and manage services; Clone instantly; Iterate on your terms; Deploy at scale, anywhere
Statistics
Stacks
90
Stacks
19
Followers
293
Followers
58
Votes
64
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 15
    Web apps
  • 11
    Easy Setup
  • 8
    Free plan
  • 8
    Great support
  • 8
    Shell access
Cons
  • 1
    No root access
  • 1
    Really small community
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Python
Python
Drupal
Drupal
Node.js
Node.js
Laravel
Laravel
WordPress
WordPress
PHP
PHP
Magento
Magento
Golang
Golang
Java
Java
Python
Python
Ruby
Ruby

What are some alternatives to PythonAnywhere, Platform.sh?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Medium

Medium

Medium is a different kind of place on the internet. A place where the measure of success isn’t views, but viewpoints. Where the quality of the idea matters, not the author’s qualifications. A place where conversation pushes ideas forward.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Tumblr

Tumblr

Tumblr is a feature rich and free blog hosting platform offering professional and fully customizable templates, bookmarklets, photos, mobile apps, and social network. The site now ranks as the 11th-largest in terms of traffic, according to Quantcast, with 170 million monthly visitors globally.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase