StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. Playwright vs Ranorex Studio

Playwright vs Ranorex Studio

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Playwright
Playwright
Stacks613
Followers586
Votes81
GitHub Stars79.0K
Forks4.8K
Ranorex Studio
Ranorex Studio
Stacks13
Followers13
Votes0

Playwright vs Ranorex Studio: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between Playwright and Ranorex Studio. Playwright and Ranorex Studio are both automation tools used for testing web applications, but they have distinct features and capabilities that set them apart.

  1. Scripting Language: Playwright is based on JavaScript, which allows for easy integration with JavaScript-based frameworks like Node.js and popular testing frameworks like Jest. On the other hand, Ranorex Studio uses C# as its scripting language, enabling seamless integration with .NET-based applications and frameworks.

  2. Multi-Browser Support: Playwright supports a wide range of browsers including Chrome, Firefox, and Safari, allowing cross-browser testing capabilities. In contrast, Ranorex Studio primarily focuses on testing web applications on Internet Explorer and Chrome browsers.

  3. Headless Mode: Playwright offers a headless mode where tests can run without displaying the browser window, increasing testing efficiency and reducing resource consumption. Ranorex Studio lacks native support for headless mode, requiring the browser window to be displayed during test execution.

  4. Mobile Testing: Playwright provides built-in mobile emulation and testing capabilities, allowing developers to test their web applications on different mobile devices and screen sizes. While Ranorex Studio has limited mobile testing support, it mainly focuses on desktop web application testing.

  5. Built-in Wait Strategies: Playwright includes built-in wait strategies, such as waiting for specific DOM events or elements to be available, which enhances test reliability and stability. Ranorex Studio also provides wait actions but lacks the extensive wait strategy options available in Playwright.

  6. Community and Support: Playwright is an open-source project supported by Microsoft and has an active developer community, making it easier to find examples, tutorials, and participate in discussions. Ranorex Studio, although it provides commercial support and a dedicated community forum, may not have the same level of community support as Playwright.

In summary, Playwright and Ranorex Studio differ in scripting language, browser support, headless mode capabilities, mobile testing support, built-in wait strategies, and community support. While Playwright offers multi-browser support, native headless mode, and extensive mobile testing capabilities, Ranorex Studio specializes in desktop web application testing primarily on Internet Explorer and Chrome browsers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Playwright
Playwright
Ranorex Studio
Ranorex Studio

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

It empowers testers with a complete toolset for end-to-end testing of desktop, web and mobile applications in a single license. Automate tests on a Windows desktop, and then execute them locally or remotely, on real iOS or Android mobile devices or on simulators/emulators.

Node library; Headless supported; Enables cross-browser web automation; Improved automated UI testing
Reliable object identification; Broad technology support; Easily maintainable repository; Easy for beginners, powerful for experts
Statistics
GitHub Stars
79.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
4.8K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
613
Stacks
13
Followers
586
Followers
13
Votes
81
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 15
    Cross browser
  • 11
    Open source
  • 9
    Test Runner with Playwright/test
  • 7
    Well documented
  • 7
    Promise based
Cons
  • 12
    Less help
  • 3
    Node based
  • 2
    Does not execute outside of browser
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Jira
Jira
Jenkins
Jenkins
Firefox
Firefox
Google Chrome
Google Chrome
Safari
Safari
Microsoft Edge
Microsoft Edge

What are some alternatives to Playwright, Ranorex Studio?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Puppeteer

Puppeteer

Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome over the DevTools Protocol. It can also be configured to use full (non-headless) Chrome.

TestingBot

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana