StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Portainer vs Watchtower

Portainer vs Watchtower

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Portainer
Portainer
Stacks506
Followers842
Votes146
Watchtower
Watchtower
Stacks30
Followers36
Votes6
GitHub Stars24.0K
Forks1.0K

Portainer vs Watchtower: What are the differences?

Introduction

Portainer and Watchtower are both tools used for managing Docker container deployments. However, there are some key differences between the two.

  1. User Interface: Portainer provides a web-based user interface that allows users to easily manage Docker containers, images, networks, and volumes. On the other hand, Watchtower does not have a user interface and is primarily a command-line tool.

  2. Functionality: Portainer allows users to create, start, stop, and delete containers, manage container networks and volumes, and monitor container health. It also supports role-based access control for managing user permissions. Watchtower, on the other hand, is specifically designed for automatic updating of Docker containers, ensuring that the latest image versions are always deployed.

  3. Updates: Portainer does not have built-in functionality for automatically updating containers. Users are responsible for manually updating their containers when new image versions are available. Watchtower, on the other hand, is specifically designed for automatic container updates. It continuously monitors the Docker image registry for new versions and automatically updates the running containers.

  4. Integration: Portainer can integrate with external authentication providers, such as LDAP or AD, to authenticate users and manage user permissions. Watchtower, being a standalone tool focused on automatic updates, does not have any authentication or integration capabilities.

  5. Deployment Flexibility: Portainer can be deployed on any Docker host, whether it is running locally or on a remote server. It can also be deployed as a container itself or as a standalone binary. Watchtower, on the other hand, is typically deployed as a container alongside other containers and is not intended for running as a standalone binary.

  6. Community Support: Portainer has a large and active community of users and contributors, providing support and ongoing development. Watchtower, while still actively maintained, has a smaller community and may have fewer resources available for support.

In summary, Portainer provides a user-friendly interface for managing Docker containers, images, networks, and volumes, with support for role-based access control. Watchtower, on the other hand, focuses on automatic container updates, continuously monitoring for new image versions and updating running containers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Portainer
Portainer
Watchtower
Watchtower

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

It is an application that will monitor your running Docker containers and watch for changes to the images that those containers were originally started from. If it detects that an image has changed, it will automatically restart the container using the new image.

Docker management; Docker UI; Docker cluster management; Swarm visualizer; Authentication; User Access Control; Docker container management; Docker service management; Docker overview; Docker console; Docker swarm status; Docker image management; Docker network management; Docker dashboard; Remote HTTP API; Automation
Notifications; Container selection; Private registries; Linked containers; Remote hosts; Secure connections; Lifecycle hooks
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
24.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.0K
Stacks
506
Stacks
30
Followers
842
Followers
36
Votes
146
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 36
    Simple
  • 27
    Great UI
  • 19
    Friendly
  • 12
    Easy to setup, gives a practical interface for Docker
  • 11
    Fully featured
Pros
  • 2
    Automation Friendly
  • 1
    Small footprint
  • 1
    Open-source
  • 1
    Great community
  • 1
    Easy setup
Integrations
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm
Docker Secrets
Docker Secrets
Auth0
Auth0
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker
Mattermost
Mattermost
Slack
Slack
Docker
Docker
Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams
Telegram
Telegram
Discord
Discord
GNU Bash
GNU Bash
Hangouts
Hangouts

What are some alternatives to Portainer, Watchtower?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Kitematic

Kitematic

Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana