StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. PostgreSQL vs Presto

PostgreSQL vs Presto

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Stacks103.0K
Followers83.9K
Votes3.6K
GitHub Stars19.0K
Forks5.2K
Presto
Presto
Stacks394
Followers1.0K
Votes66

PostgreSQL vs Presto: What are the differences?

Key differences between PostgreSQL and Presto

PostgreSQL and Presto are both popular open-source databases that serve different purposes and have different features. Here are the key differences between the two:

  1. Data Storage and Query Engine: PostgreSQL is a relational database management system (RDBMS) that uses a traditional row-based storage model. It is designed for handling structured data and supports ACID transactions. Presto, on the other hand, is a distributed SQL query engine that is built for fast, interactive analytics across various data sources. It can query data from diverse sources like Hadoop, Cassandra, and relational databases.

  2. Scalability and Performance: PostgreSQL is known for its scalability and can handle large amounts of data efficiently, especially with proper indexing and optimization. However, Presto is specifically designed for distributed computing and can process massive amounts of data across multiple nodes, providing high performance even for complex queries.

  3. Data Types and Query Language: PostgreSQL supports a wide range of data types and has a rich set of built-in functions and operators. It also provides an extensive query language (SQL) with support for complex queries and advanced features like window functions. Presto supports a subset of PostgreSQL data types and provides its own query language called PrestoSQL, which is similar to SQL but also includes some additional functions and syntax.

  4. Use Cases and Workloads: PostgreSQL is commonly used as a general-purpose database for various applications and workloads, including web applications, content management systems, and data warehousing. It is well-suited for transactional use cases and OLTP workloads. Presto, on the other hand, is primarily used for analytical queries and data exploration. It is often deployed in data lakes or data warehouses for ad-hoc queries and interactive analytics.

  5. Ecosystem and Integration: PostgreSQL has a mature ecosystem with a wide range of tools and libraries that integrate seamlessly with it. It supports a large number of extensions and has a strong community support. Presto, being a distributed query engine, integrates with various data sources and can query data from different systems using connectors. It also supports pluggable connectors for extending its capabilities.

  6. Ease of Use and Administration: PostgreSQL has a reputation for being easy to use and has excellent documentation and community resources. It provides a graphical interface (pgAdmin) and various command-line tools for managing and administering the database. Presto, being primarily a query engine, requires more setup and configuration compared to PostgreSQL. It is typically managed using tools like Presto Manager and requires more expertise in distributed systems.

In summary, PostgreSQL is a powerful relational database management system with advanced features and broad applicability, while Presto is a distributed SQL query engine specifically designed for high-performance analytics and querying diverse data sources. The choice between them depends on the specific use case and requirements of the project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on PostgreSQL, Presto

Ashish
Ashish

Tech Lead, Big Data Platform at Pinterest

Nov 27, 2019

Needs adviceonApache HiveApache HivePrestoPrestoAmazon EC2Amazon EC2

To provide employees with the critical need of interactive querying, we’ve worked with Presto, an open-source distributed SQL query engine, over the years. Operating Presto at Pinterest’s scale has involved resolving quite a few challenges like, supporting deeply nested and huge thrift schemas, slow/ bad worker detection and remediation, auto-scaling cluster, graceful cluster shutdown and impersonation support for ldap authenticator.

Our infrastructure is built on top of Amazon EC2 and we leverage Amazon S3 for storing our data. This separates compute and storage layers, and allows multiple compute clusters to share the S3 data.

We have hundreds of petabytes of data and tens of thousands of Apache Hive tables. Our Presto clusters are comprised of a fleet of 450 r4.8xl EC2 instances. Presto clusters together have over 100 TBs of memory and 14K vcpu cores. Within Pinterest, we have close to more than 1,000 monthly active users (out of total 1,600+ Pinterest employees) using Presto, who run about 400K queries on these clusters per month.

Each query submitted to Presto cluster is logged to a Kafka topic via Singer. Singer is a logging agent built at Pinterest and we talked about it in a previous post. Each query is logged when it is submitted and when it finishes. When a Presto cluster crashes, we will have query submitted events without corresponding query finished events. These events enable us to capture the effect of cluster crashes over time.

Each Presto cluster at Pinterest has workers on a mix of dedicated AWS EC2 instances and Kubernetes pods. Kubernetes platform provides us with the capability to add and remove workers from a Presto cluster very quickly. The best-case latency on bringing up a new worker on Kubernetes is less than a minute. However, when the Kubernetes cluster itself is out of resources and needs to scale up, it can take up to ten minutes. Some other advantages of deploying on Kubernetes platform is that our Presto deployment becomes agnostic of cloud vendor, instance types, OS, etc.

#BigData #AWS #DataScience #DataEngineering

3.72M views3.72M
Comments
Kyle
Kyle

Web Application Developer at Redacted DevWorks

Dec 3, 2019

DecidedonPostGISPostGIS

While there's been some very clever techniques that has allowed non-natively supported geo querying to be performed, it is incredibly slow in the long game and error prone at best.

MySQL finally introduced it's own GEO functions and special indexing operations for GIS type data. I prototyped with this, as MySQL is the most familiar database to me. But no matter what I did with it, how much tuning i'd give it, how much I played with it, the results would come back inconsistent.

It was very disappointing.

I figured, at this point, that SQL Server, being an enterprise solution authored by one of the biggest worldwide software developers in the world, Microsoft, might contain some decent GIS in it.

I was very disappointed.

Postgres is a Database solution i'm still getting familiar with, but I noticed it had no built in support for GIS. So I hilariously didn't pay it too much attention. That was until I stumbled upon PostGIS and my world changed forever.

449k views449k
Comments
George
George

Student

Mar 18, 2020

Needs adviceonPostgreSQLPostgreSQLPythonPythonDjangoDjango

Hello everyone,

Well, I want to build a large-scale project, but I do not know which ORDBMS to choose. The app should handle real-time operations, not chatting, but things like future scheduling or reminders. It should be also really secure, fast and easy to use. And last but not least, should I use them both. I mean PostgreSQL with Python / Django and MongoDB with Node.js? Or would it be better to use PostgreSQL with Node.js?

*The project is going to use React for the front-end and GraphQL is going to be used for the API.

Thank you all. Any answer or advice would be really helpful!

620k views620k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Presto
Presto

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Distributed SQL Query Engine for Big Data

Statistics
GitHub Stars
19.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
5.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
103.0K
Stacks
394
Followers
83.9K
Followers
1.0K
Votes
3.6K
Votes
66
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 765
    Relational database
  • 511
    High availability
  • 439
    Enterprise class database
  • 383
    Sql
  • 304
    Sql + nosql
Cons
  • 10
    Table/index bloatings
Pros
  • 18
    Works directly on files in s3 (no ETL)
  • 13
    Open-source
  • 12
    Join multiple databases
  • 10
    Scalable
  • 7
    Gets ready in minutes
Integrations
No integrations available
Kafka
Kafka
Redis
Redis
MySQL
MySQL
Hadoop
Hadoop
Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server

What are some alternatives to PostgreSQL, Presto?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

InfluxDB

InfluxDB

InfluxDB is a scalable datastore for metrics, events, and real-time analytics. It has a built-in HTTP API so you don't have to write any server side code to get up and running. InfluxDB is designed to be scalable, simple to install and manage, and fast to get data in and out.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase