StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Prettier vs Sass Lint

Prettier vs Sass Lint

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Sass Lint
Sass Lint
Stacks27
Followers43
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.8K
Forks519
Prettier
Prettier
Stacks13.2K
Followers1.3K
Votes7
GitHub Stars51.1K
Forks4.6K

Prettier vs Sass Lint : What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code snippet, we will present the key differences between Prettier and Sass Lint, two popular and widely used tools in web development for code formatting and linting. Markdown code formatting will be used to present the information in a website-friendly manner.

  1. Configuration: Prettier does not require any configuration and follows a set of default rules, making it easier and faster to set up. On the other hand, Sass Lint allows extensive configuration to customize linting rules according to specific project requirements.

  2. Language Support: Prettier is a code formatter that supports a wide range of programming languages, including HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and more. In contrast, Sass Lint is specifically designed for linting Sass code, focusing on CSS preprocessors like Sass, SCSS, and Less.

  3. Formatting vs Linting: Prettier focuses mainly on code formatting and auto-formatting capabilities, ensuring consistent and aesthetically pleasing code style. Sass Lint, on the other hand, emphasizes linting, which involves analyzing code for potential errors, performance issues, and adherence to coding conventions and best practices.

  4. Rule Categories: Prettier provides a single set of formatting rules that are applied globally to the code. It does not have separate rule categories. In contrast, Sass Lint offers distinct rule categories, such as "Possible Errors," "Stylistic Issues," and "Best Practices," allowing developers to enable or disable specific rule categories based on their needs.

  5. Integration with Build Processes: Prettier can be easily integrated into build processes and workflows through tools like ESLint or IDE plugins, enabling developers to automatically format code during development or as part of a continuous integration/delivery pipeline. Sass Lint, on the other hand, may require additional configuration or plugins to seamlessly integrate into build processes.

  6. Error Reporting: Prettier focuses on formatting code and does not provide detailed error reporting. It may not highlight specific linting issues such as unused variables or missing semicolons. Sass Lint, being a dedicated linter, provides more detailed error reporting, enabling developers to quickly identify and fix specific code quality issues.

In summary, Prettier is a versatile code formatter with minimal configuration requirements, while Sass Lint is a specialized linter tailored specifically for Sass/SCSS code with extensive customization options. Prettier focuses on formatting, while Sass Lint provides linting capabilities and detailed error reporting for Sass code.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Sass Lint , Prettier

Carlos
Carlos

Mar 14, 2020

Needs adviceonPrettierPrettierESLintESLintgulpgulp

Scenario: I want to integrate Prettier in our code base which is currently using ESLint (for .js and .scss both). The project is using gulp.

It doesn't feel quite right to me to use ESLint, I wonder if it would be better to use Stylelint or Sass Lint instead.

I completed integrating ESLint + Prettier, Planning to do the same with [ Stylelint || Sasslint || EsLint] + Prettier.

And have gulp 'fix' on file save (Watcher).

Any recommendation is appreciated.

465k views465k
Comments
Alex
Alex

Software Engineer

Aug 7, 2020

Review

you don't actually have to choose between these tools as they have vastly different purposes. i think its more a matter of understanding how to use them.

while eslint and stylelint are used to notify you about code quality issues, to guide you to write better code, prettier automatically handles code formatting (without notifying me). nothing else.

prettier and eslint both officially discourage using the eslint-plugin-prettier way, as these tools actually do very different things. autofixing with linters on watch isnt a great idea either. auto-fixing should only be done intentionally. you're not alone though, as a lot of devs set this up wrong.

i encourage you to think about what problem you're trying to solve and configure accordingly.

for my teams i set it up like this:

  • eslint, stylelint, prettier locally installed for cli use and ide support
  • eslint config prettier (code formatting rules are not eslints business, so dont warn me about it)
  • vscode workspace config: format on save
  • separate npm scripts for linting, and formatting
  • precommit hooks (husky)

so you can easily integrate with gulp. its just js after all ;)

159k views159k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Sass Lint
Sass Lint
Prettier
Prettier

It is a Node-only Sass linter for both sass and scss syntax. It can be run through a command line interface. Special comments can be used to disable and enable certain rules throughout your source files in a variety of scenarios.

Prettier is an opinionated code formatter. It enforces a consistent style by parsing your code and re-printing it with its own rules that take the maximum line length into account, wrapping code when necessary.

ability to run Sass Lint through a command line interface
An opinionated code formatter; Supports many languages; Integrates with most editors; Has few options; You press save and code is formatted; No need to discuss style in code review; Saves you time and energy
Statistics
GitHub Stars
1.8K
GitHub Stars
51.1K
GitHub Forks
519
GitHub Forks
4.6K
Stacks
27
Stacks
13.2K
Followers
43
Followers
1.3K
Votes
0
Votes
7
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 2
    Customizable
  • 1
    Open Source
  • 1
    Completely free
  • 1
    Runs offline
  • 1
    Follows the Ruby Style Guide by default
Integrations
Sublime Text
Sublime Text
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
GraphQL
GraphQL
JavaScript
JavaScript
TypeScript
TypeScript
Flow
Flow
Vue.js
Vue.js
AngularJS
AngularJS
markdown
markdown
YAML
YAML
Less
Less

What are some alternatives to Sass Lint , Prettier?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana