Proto.io vs UXPin

Overview

Proto.io

Stacks51

Followers89

Votes10

UXPin

Stacks98

Followers130

Votes26

Proto.io vs UXPin: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

Integration with design tools: One key difference between Proto.io and UXPin is the level of integration with other design tools. Proto.io offers seamless integration with tools like Sketch, Adobe XD, and Figma, allowing designers to work in their preferred environment. On the other hand, UXPin also integrates with these tools, but it goes a step further by offering a plugin that syncs design files, making collaboration and design updates more efficient.
Prototyping capabilities: While both Proto.io and UXPin are powerful prototyping tools, they differ in their capabilities. Proto.io is known for its robust animation features and advanced interactions, making it ideal for creating high-fidelity prototypes. On the other hand, UXPin focuses more on creating interactive wireframes and prototypes that closely resemble the final product, making it a great choice for user testing and validation.
Collaboration features: Another important difference between Proto.io and UXPin is their collaboration features. Proto.io offers real-time collaboration, allowing team members to work together on the same prototype simultaneously. In contrast, UXPin focuses more on feedback and iteration, with features like commenting and version history to streamline the design process.
Learning curve: When it comes to ease of use, Proto.io is generally considered to have a steeper learning curve compared to UXPin. While Proto.io offers more advanced features and customization options, it may take some time for new users to fully grasp its capabilities. On the other hand, UXPin is known for its intuitive interface and user-friendly design, making it easier for beginners to create prototypes quickly.
Customization options: Proto.io and UXPin also differ in their customization options. Proto.io offers a wide range of customization features, allowing designers to fine-tune every aspect of their prototypes. UXPin, on the other hand, focuses more on design systems and reusable components, making it easier to maintain consistency across multiple projects.
Pricing plans: The pricing plans for Proto.io and UXPin vary in terms of features and affordability. Proto.io offers a tiered pricing structure based on the user's needs, with options for individuals, teams, and enterprise-level users. In contrast, UXPin offers a single pricing plan with different billing cycles, making it easier for users to choose a plan that fits their budget and requirements.

In Summary, Proto.io and UXPin differ in their integration with design tools, prototyping capabilities, collaboration features, learning curve, customization options, and pricing plans.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Proto.io	UXPin
Proto.io supports all the major mobile gestures and touch events like tap, tap-hold, swipe, pinch, and zoom. Interaction designers are not limited to a single ‘link’ transition anymore. Instead they can apply animated screen transitions like slide, fade, pop, flip, flow, and turn.	It is a code-based design tool that merges design and engineering into one unified process. Thanks to conditional interactions, variables, state-based animations, and powerful expressions, you can build prototypes that feel like the real thing. In other words, anything that's on the web can be accurately prototyped in UXPin.
Interactive designs;Prototype for all devices;Wonderful UI libraries;Actual device testing;Share, add comments;Publish and Export to HTML;States, Animations & Timelines;Drag & Rotate;Variables & Item properties;Intuitive editor interface with drag-n-drop features, no coding required;Silly-fast mobile prototyping;Templates and reusable containers for easy development;Powerful digital asset manager;HTML5 fonts support;Auto-save function;Version history and rollback;100% web-based, nothing to install;Custom branding for your account and prototypes;Overwhelming technical support;Extensive documentation, screencasts, examples and sample prototypes	Design powered with code; Prototypes that feel like the real thing; Collaboration doesn’t get easier than this; Design systems at scale
Statistics
Stacks 51	Stacks 98
Followers 89	Followers 130
Votes 10	Votes 26
Pros & Cons
Pros 4 Easy to get started with a good set of UI controls 3 Try prototype on mobile device 3 Design on site, better than simply importing stuff	Pros 5 Semantic UI support 5 Can make unique interactions 2 Design Systems 2 Prototyping 2 Jira Integration Cons 1 No free tier
Integrations
No integrations available	Slack Sketch Adobe Photoshop

What are some alternatives to Proto.io, UXPin?

InVision

InVision lets you create stunningly realistic interactive wireframes and prototypes without compromising your creative vision.

Balsamiq

Balsamiq Mockups is a web tool that allows users to mock up different designs and ideas quickly and easily. Balsamic Mockups is similar to drawing mockups, but it is digital

Avocode

Avocode is a cross-platform app that helps designers and developers collaborate and easily handoff designs. Avocode comes with 14 days free trial.

Marvel

A super simple tool that turns any image (including PSDs) or sketch into interactive prototypes for any device. Powered by Dropbox.

Pidoco

It is software that lets you quickly create click-through wireframes and fully interactive UX prototypes.

Atomic

Pull in designs from Photoshop or Sketch, instantly animate between them, and share your prototypes with anyone or view on any device via URL.

AppScreenshots - AI-Powered App Store Screenshot Generator

Create beautiful app screenshots for App Store and Google Play in minutes. Free screenshot generator with templates. No signup required. Try now!

UX Magic AI

UXMagic is an AI-driven design tool that helps designers and product teams generate structured wireframes, user flows, and UI layouts from simple text prompts, images/screenshots, sketches, or live URLs. Instead of producing disconnected screens, UXMagic focuses on UX logic, layout hierarchy, and design consistency, making it easier to move from ideas to usable product designs quickly. Built for real-world product workflows, UXMagic supports rapid ideation, early prototyping, and scalable design systems. It integrates smoothly with Figma-based workflows and is especially useful for startups and teams shipping MVPs, SaaS products, and experiments where speed, clarity, and structure matter.

Wireflow

Wireflow is a powerful AI tool designed to streamline wireframing and prototyping processes for digital product designers. With its intuitive interface, Wireflow enables users to create, visualize, and iterate on their design ideas quickly and efficiently. This tool supports collaborative workflows, allowing teams to work together seamlessly, enhancing productivity and creativity. Ideal for UX/UI designers, Wireflow simplifies the design process, making it easier to bring concepts to life while ensuring clarity and precision. Elevate your design projects and improve team collaboration with Wireflow's advanced features and user-friendly environment.

Axure

The way to plan, prototype, and hand off to developers, all without code. A wireframing, rapid prototyping, documentation and specification software tool aimed at web, mobile and desktop applications.

Related Comparisons

Proto.io vs UXPin: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

Integration with design tools: One key difference between Proto.io and UXPin is the level of integration with other design tools. Proto.io offers seamless integration with tools like Sketch, Adobe XD, and Figma, allowing designers to work in their preferred environment. On the other hand, UXPin also integrates with these tools, but it goes a step further by offering a plugin that syncs design files, making collaboration and design updates more efficient.
Prototyping capabilities: While both Proto.io and UXPin are powerful prototyping tools, they differ in their capabilities. Proto.io is known for its robust animation features and advanced interactions, making it ideal for creating high-fidelity prototypes. On the other hand, UXPin focuses more on creating interactive wireframes and prototypes that closely resemble the final product, making it a great choice for user testing and validation.
Collaboration features: Another important difference between Proto.io and UXPin is their collaboration features. Proto.io offers real-time collaboration, allowing team members to work together on the same prototype simultaneously. In contrast, UXPin focuses more on feedback and iteration, with features like commenting and version history to streamline the design process.
Learning curve: When it comes to ease of use, Proto.io is generally considered to have a steeper learning curve compared to UXPin. While Proto.io offers more advanced features and customization options, it may take some time for new users to fully grasp its capabilities. On the other hand, UXPin is known for its intuitive interface and user-friendly design, making it easier for beginners to create prototypes quickly.
Customization options: Proto.io and UXPin also differ in their customization options. Proto.io offers a wide range of customization features, allowing designers to fine-tune every aspect of their prototypes. UXPin, on the other hand, focuses more on design systems and reusable components, making it easier to maintain consistency across multiple projects.
Pricing plans: The pricing plans for Proto.io and UXPin vary in terms of features and affordability. Proto.io offers a tiered pricing structure based on the user's needs, with options for individuals, teams, and enterprise-level users. In contrast, UXPin offers a single pricing plan with different billing cycles, making it easier for users to choose a plan that fits their budget and requirements.

In Summary, Proto.io and UXPin differ in their integration with design tools, prototyping capabilities, collaboration features, learning curve, customization options, and pricing plans.

Proto.io vs UXPin

Overview