StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Virtual Machine Management
  5. Proxmox VE vs XenServer

Proxmox VE vs XenServer

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

XenServer
XenServer
Stacks52
Followers57
Votes0
Proxmox VE
Proxmox VE
Stacks352
Followers334
Votes41

Proxmox VE vs XenServer: What are the differences?

Proxmox VE and XenServer are both popular virtualization platforms, each offering different features and capabilities. Let's discuss the key differences between Proxmox VE and XenServer.

  1. Hypervisor Type: Proxmox VE uses the Linux Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM) as its hypervisor, while XenServer utilizes the Xen hypervisor. This difference in hypervisor type affects the way virtual machines are managed and overall performance.

  2. Management Interface: Proxmox VE provides a web-based management interface where users can easily manage their virtual machines, containers, and storage. On the other hand, XenServer offers XenCenter, a Windows-based management application that allows users to control and monitor their virtual infrastructure.

  3. License Type: Proxmox VE is an open-source virtualization platform, and therefore it is free to use with optional subscription-based support. XenServer, however, is a proprietary product that requires a commercial license for full functionality. This distinction may affect the cost considerations for organizations.

  4. High Availability: Proxmox VE supports High Availability (HA) clustering, allowing multiple hosts to work together, automatically migrating virtual machines in the event of a failure. XenServer also offers HA capabilities, ensuring continuous availability of virtual machines by enabling failover to other hosts in the cluster.

  5. Supported Operating Systems: Proxmox VE provides a wide range of supported guest operating systems, including various Linux distributions, Windows Server, and more. XenServer also supports numerous operating systems, but it focuses primarily on supporting Windows and Linux operating systems.

  6. Backup and Restore: Proxmox VE offers built-in backup and restore functionality, allowing users to easily back up their virtual machines, containers, and configurations. XenServer does not provide native backup and restore capabilities out of the box, and users need to rely on external tools or third-party solutions.

In summary, Proxmox VE, an open-source solution, integrates virtualization (KVM) and containerization (LXC) in a unified platform with a web-based management interface. XenServer, developed by Citrix, focuses on enterprise virtualization, providing advanced features like live migration and centralized management for virtual machines, making it suitable for large-scale and mission-critical virtualization deployments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

XenServer
XenServer
Proxmox VE
Proxmox VE

It is a leading virtualization management platform optimized for application, desktop and server virtualization infrastructures. It is used in the world's largest clouds and enterprises.

It is a complete open-source platform for all-inclusive enterprise virtualization that tightly integrates KVM hypervisor and LXC containers, software-defined storage and networking functionality on a single platform, and easily manages high availability clusters and disaster recovery tools with the built-in web management interface.

Statistics
Stacks
52
Stacks
352
Followers
57
Followers
334
Votes
0
Votes
41
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 9
    HA VM & LXC devices
  • 8
    Ease of use
  • 7
    Robust architecture
  • 6
    Free
  • 6
    Avoid vendor lock-in

What are some alternatives to XenServer, Proxmox VE?

Vagrant

Vagrant

Vagrant provides the framework and configuration format to create and manage complete portable development environments. These development environments can live on your computer or in the cloud, and are portable between Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux.

VirtualBox

VirtualBox

VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Not only is VirtualBox an extremely feature rich, high performance product for enterprise customers, it is also the only professional solution that is freely available as Open Source Software under the terms of the GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2.

boot2docker

boot2docker

boot2docker is a lightweight Linux distribution based on Tiny Core Linux made specifically to run Docker containers. It runs completely from RAM, weighs ~27MB and boots in ~5s (YMMV).

VMware vSphere

VMware vSphere

vSphere is the world’s leading server virtualization platform. Run fewer servers and reduce capital and operating costs using VMware vSphere to build a cloud computing infrastructure.

Otto

Otto

Otto automatically builds development environments without any configuration; it can detect your project type and has built-in knowledge of industry-standard tools to setup a development environment that is ready to go. When you're ready to deploy, otto builds and manages an infrastructure, sets up servers, builds, and deploys the application.

libvirt

libvirt

It is an open-source API, daemon and management tool for managing platform virtualization. It can be used to manage KVM, Xen, VMware ESXi, QEMU and other virtualization technologies.

KVM

KVM

KVM (for Kernel-based Virtual Machine) is a full virtualization solution for Linux on x86 hardware containing virtualization extensions (Intel VT or AMD-V).

Qemu

Qemu

When used as a machine emulator, it can run OSes and programs made for one machine (e.g. an ARM board) on a different machine (e.g. your own PC). By using dynamic translation, it achieves very good performance. When used as a virtualizer, it achieves near native performance by executing the guest code directly on the host CPU. it supports virtualization when executing under the Xen hypervisor or using the KVM kernel module in Linux. When using KVM, it can virtualize x86, server and embedded PowerPC, 64-bit POWER, S390, 32-bit and 64-bit ARM, and MIPS guests.

Azk

Azk

azk lets developers easily and quickly install and configure development environments on their computers.

Parallels Desktop

Parallels Desktop

Parallels Desktop for Mac allows you to seamlessly run both Windows and MacOS applications side-by-side with speed, control and confidence.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana