PRTG vs Zabbix

Overview

Zabbix

Stacks684

Followers981

Votes66

GitHub Stars5.3K

Forks1.1K

PRTG

Stacks56

Followers66

Votes0

PRTG vs Zabbix: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between PRTG and Zabbix, two popular network monitoring tools.

Scalability: PRTG offers a more scalable solution compared to Zabbix. With its distributed monitoring architecture, PRTG allows for easy expansion and can handle large-scale networks without performance degradation. In contrast, Zabbix is better suited for smaller networks and may face limitations when monitoring a large number of devices.
Ease of Use: PRTG provides a user-friendly interface with intuitive dashboards and customizable reports. It offers a quick and easy installation process, making it accessible for both beginners and experienced users. Zabbix, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve and requires more technical expertise to set up and configure.
Alerting and Notifications: PRTG offers flexible alerting and notification options. It allows users to define custom alert triggers and notifications via email, SMS, or push notifications. Additionally, PRTG provides escalation mechanisms and acknowledges alerts, ensuring that critical issues are reported and resolved promptly. Zabbix also provides alerting capabilities, but its configuration and customization options are more complex compared to PRTG.
Monitoring Capabilities: PRTG provides comprehensive monitoring capabilities for various network components, including servers, routers, switches, and virtual environments. It supports a wide range of protocols and vendors, making it versatile for monitoring different technologies. Zabbix, on the other hand, focuses more on monitoring servers and applications, with limited support for network devices.
Integration and APIs: PRTG offers a rich set of APIs and integrations, allowing seamless integration with third-party systems and tools. It supports various programming languages and provides comprehensive documentation for integration purposes. Zabbix also offers APIs, but its integration capabilities are not as extensive as PRTG.
Licensing Model: PRTG follows a commercial licensing model, offering a free version with limited features and a paid version with additional features and unlimited sensors. Zabbix, on the other hand, follows an open-source licensing model, providing all features and functionalities for free. However, the open-source version of Zabbix lacks some advanced features available in the commercial version.

In Summary, PRTG and Zabbix differ in scalability, ease of use, alerting and notifications, monitoring capabilities, integration and APIs, as well as licensing model.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Zabbix, PRTG

vivek

Jun 8, 2020

Needs adviceon

Centreon

Zabbix

Datadog

My team is divided on using Centreon or Zabbix for enterprise monitoring and alert automation. Can someone let us know which one is better? There is one more tool called Datadog that we are using for cloud assets. Of course, Datadog presents us with huge bills. So we want to have a comparative study. Suggestions and advice are welcome. Thanks!

796k views796k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Zabbix	PRTG
Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.	It can monitor and classify system conditions like bandwidth usage or uptime and collect statistics from miscellaneous hosts as switches, routers, servers and other devices and applications.
Smart, Highly Automated Metric Collection; Advanced Problem Detection; Intelligent Alerting and Remediation	FLEXIBLE ALERTING; MULTIPLE USER INTERFACES; CLUSTER FAILOVER SOLUTION;
Statistics
GitHub Stars 5.3K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 1.1K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 684	Stacks 56
Followers 981	Followers 66
Votes 66	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 21 Free 9 Alerts 5 Service/node/network discovery 5 Templates 4 Base metrics from the box Cons 5 The UI is in PHP 2 Puppet module is sluggish	Cons 1 Running on windows 1 Graphs are static 1 Poor search capabilities
Integrations
Slack Jira PagerDuty Grafana Ansible Skype Chef Bugzilla HipChat ServiceNow.com	Grafana Slack

What are some alternatives to Zabbix, PRTG?

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

StatsD

It is a network daemon that runs on the Node.js platform and listens for statistics, like counters and timers, sent over UDP or TCP and sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services (e.g., Graphite).

Jaeger

Jaeger, a Distributed Tracing System

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana

PRTG vs Zabbix: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between PRTG and Zabbix, two popular network monitoring tools.

Scalability: PRTG offers a more scalable solution compared to Zabbix. With its distributed monitoring architecture, PRTG allows for easy expansion and can handle large-scale networks without performance degradation. In contrast, Zabbix is better suited for smaller networks and may face limitations when monitoring a large number of devices.
Ease of Use: PRTG provides a user-friendly interface with intuitive dashboards and customizable reports. It offers a quick and easy installation process, making it accessible for both beginners and experienced users. Zabbix, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve and requires more technical expertise to set up and configure.
Alerting and Notifications: PRTG offers flexible alerting and notification options. It allows users to define custom alert triggers and notifications via email, SMS, or push notifications. Additionally, PRTG provides escalation mechanisms and acknowledges alerts, ensuring that critical issues are reported and resolved promptly. Zabbix also provides alerting capabilities, but its configuration and customization options are more complex compared to PRTG.
Monitoring Capabilities: PRTG provides comprehensive monitoring capabilities for various network components, including servers, routers, switches, and virtual environments. It supports a wide range of protocols and vendors, making it versatile for monitoring different technologies. Zabbix, on the other hand, focuses more on monitoring servers and applications, with limited support for network devices.
Integration and APIs: PRTG offers a rich set of APIs and integrations, allowing seamless integration with third-party systems and tools. It supports various programming languages and provides comprehensive documentation for integration purposes. Zabbix also offers APIs, but its integration capabilities are not as extensive as PRTG.
Licensing Model: PRTG follows a commercial licensing model, offering a free version with limited features and a paid version with additional features and unlimited sensors. Zabbix, on the other hand, follows an open-source licensing model, providing all features and functionalities for free. However, the open-source version of Zabbix lacks some advanced features available in the commercial version.

In Summary, PRTG and Zabbix differ in scalability, ease of use, alerting and notifications, monitoring capabilities, integration and APIs, as well as licensing model.