StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. Puppeteer vs TestCafe

Puppeteer vs TestCafe

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

TestCafe
TestCafe
Stacks262
Followers273
Votes26
GitHub Stars9.9K
Forks678
Puppeteer
Puppeteer
Stacks1.0K
Followers582
Votes26

Puppeteer vs TestCafe: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Puppeteer and TestCafe, highlighting their key differences.

  1. Cross-Browser Support: Puppeteer primarily focuses on Google Chrome and its browser version. However, TestCafe supports multiple browsers out of the box, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Internet Explorer. This makes TestCafe a better choice when aiming for cross-platform compatibility and wider browser coverage.

  2. Architecture: Puppeteer is a Node.js library that relies on the Chrome DevTools Protocol to control Chrome or Chromium browsers. On the other hand, TestCafe is built on top of JavaScript and does not require any browser plugins or additional dependencies for test execution. This makes TestCafe easier to set up and use compared to Puppeteer.

  3. Page Interactions: Puppeteer allows low-level control of pages, enabling actions such as keyboard input, mouse clicks, and navigation. TestCafe, however, provides higher-level abstractions for these interactions, making it simpler to write tests without the need for extensive JavaScript knowledge or handling details of browser-specific APIs.

  4. Parallel Test Execution: TestCafe inherently supports parallel test execution, allowing tests to run concurrently across multiple browsers or instances. Puppeteer, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for parallel execution, and achieving parallelism requires additional configuration and implementation.

  5. Test Isolation: TestCafe is designed to run each test in a separate browser instance, ensuring complete isolation between test cases. This eliminates any cross-contamination of data or state between tests. Puppeteer, although offering similar capabilities, does not enforce test isolation by default and requires explicit handling to achieve isolation.

  6. TestCafe Cloud Testing: TestCafe provides a cloud testing service called TestCafe Studio, which allows users to execute tests on remote machines or virtual machines in the cloud. Puppeteer, in contrast, does not offer a cloud testing solution natively.

In summary, TestCafe offers better cross-browser support, simpler architecture, higher-level abstractions for page interactions, built-in parallel test execution, test isolation by default, and a cloud testing option, making it a more versatile and comprehensive automation framework compared to Puppeteer.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on TestCafe, Puppeteer

Ankur
Ankur

Software Engineer

Dec 4, 2019

Needs advice

I am using Node 12 for server scripting and have a function to generate PDF and send it to a browser. Currently, we are using PhantomJS to generate a PDF. Some web post shows that we can achieve PDF generation using Puppeteer. I was a bit confused. Should we move to puppeteerJS? Which one is better with NodeJS for generating PDF?

73.1k views73.1k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

TestCafe
TestCafe
Puppeteer
Puppeteer

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome over the DevTools Protocol. It can also be configured to use full (non-headless) Chrome.

Create stable tests (and no manual timeouts); Write in latest JS or TypeScript; Detect JS errors in your code; Launch concurrent tests; Build readable tests with PageObject; Include tests in continuous integration system; Rapid test development
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
9.9K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
678
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
262
Stacks
1.0K
Followers
273
Followers
582
Votes
26
Votes
26
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 8
    Cross-browser testing
  • 4
    Built in waits
  • 4
    Easy setup/installation
  • 4
    Open source
  • 3
    UI End to End testing
Cons
  • 9
    No longer free
Pros
  • 10
    Very well documented
  • 10
    Scriptable web browser
  • 6
    Promise based
Cons
  • 10
    Chrome only
Integrations
TypeScript
TypeScript
JavaScript
JavaScript
Jenkins
Jenkins
Travis CI
Travis CI
TeamCity
TeamCity
Node.js
Node.js

What are some alternatives to TestCafe, Puppeteer?

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

PhantomJS

PhantomJS

PhantomJS is a headless WebKit scriptable with JavaScript. It is used by hundreds of developers and dozens of organizations for web-related development workflow.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana