Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Pusher vs Pushpin: What are the differences?
# Introduction
1. **Real-time Communication Protocol**: Pusher uses WebSockets as its primary real-time communication protocol, providing low-latency, bi-directional communication between clients and servers. In contrast, Pushpin employs the HTTP protocol with long polling, streaming, and WebSockets, offering more flexibility in communication methods.
2. **Hosting and Scalability**: Pusher is a hosted service, which means it handles the infrastructure and scalability for you, allowing for ease of use. On the other hand, Pushpin requires self-hosting, giving users more control over their infrastructure but requiring more effort to set up and maintain.
3. **Server-Sent Events Support**: Pusher supports Server-Sent Events, enabling real-time updates from the server to the client over a single HTTP connection. Pushpin, however, lacks native support for Server-Sent Events but can be configured to work with additional middleware to achieve similar functionality.
4. **Client Compatibility**: Pusher provides libraries and SDKs for a wide range of client platforms, making it easier for developers to integrate real-time functionality into their applications. In contrast, Pushpin's client compatibility may vary depending on the specific setup and configuration.
5. **Authentication and Authorization**: Pusher offers built-in authentication and authorization mechanisms to control access to real-time channels, simplifying the implementation of security features. Pushpin, on the other hand, may require additional customization to add robust authentication and authorization capabilities.
6. **Message Queueing**: Pusher includes built-in message queueing to handle spikes in traffic and prevent message loss during network interruptions, ensuring reliable real-time communication. Pushpin lacks built-in message queueing and may require external solutions to achieve similar levels of reliability.
In Summary, Pusher and Pushpin differ in their communication protocol, hosting approach, support for Server-Sent Events, client compatibility, authentication mechanisms, and message queueing capabilities.
I am building an IoT application that will utilize connected air quality sensors to provide real-time indoor air quality in offices. I want to be able to share this data with a few different databases, etc.
Wondering if anyone has any advice on which real-time streaming API would be best for this sort of application, or even how I should think about it?
For IoT, we support MQTT along with websockets and SSE. The pattern you're suggesting that involves harvesting data from devices and soaking into a database is easy to achieve with one of the Ably integrations (Serverless functions/webhook) . Here are some tutorials to do things like this: https://ably.com/tutorials/reactor-event-zapier#step2-mqtt-ably
We use Pusher at www.justlearn.com. It works fine. When you reach more users, Pusher gets expensive. We use Pusher for live chat between users. Their software is easy to use. We have had issues with auth on Pusher.
Pros of Pusher
- An easy way to give customers realtime features55
- Websockets40
- Simple34
- Easy to get started with27
- Free plan25
- Heroku Add-on12
- Easy and fast to configure and to understand11
- JSON9
- Happy6
- Azure Add-on6
- Support5
- Push notification4
Pros of Pushpin
- Open source3
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Pusher
- Costly10
Cons of Pushpin
- Worst community support1