Pylint vs Veracode

Overview

Pylint

Stacks873

Followers97

Votes17

Veracode

Stacks66

Followers129

Votes0

Pylint vs Veracode: What are the differences?

# Introduction
In this Markdown, we will discuss the key differences between Pylint and Veracode, popular code analysis tools used for ensuring code quality and security.

1. **Analysis Focus**: Pylint focuses on analyzing Python code specifically, providing insights into coding standards, potential errors, and refactoring suggestions. On the other hand, Veracode extends its analysis to a wide range of programming languages beyond Python, including C/C++, Java, and more, with a strong emphasis on security vulnerabilities assessment.
   
2. **Deployment**: Pylint is typically integrated into the developer's workflow as a linter tool, running during coding to give real-time feedback and suggestions. Contrastingly, Veracode is usually employed as part of the software build pipeline or CI/CD process, allowing for automated security testing and compliance checks at each stage of development.
   
3. **Scalability**: While Pylint is suitable for small to medium-scale projects due to its ease of integration and lightweight nature, Veracode is better suited for enterprise-level applications or organizations requiring comprehensive security testing and compliance features at scale.
   
4. **Comprehensive Code Security**: Veracode offers advanced security scanning capabilities, such as static, dynamic, and software composition analysis, to identify a wide range of security vulnerabilities, including OWASP top 10 vulnerabilities, while Pylint primarily focuses on code quality and adherence to coding standards.
   
5. **Reporting and Remediation**: Veracode provides detailed reports on vulnerabilities found in the codebase, along with recommended fixes and prioritization based on severity levels, aiding developers in efficient remediation. In contrast, Pylint offers insights into code quality issues but may not provide as extensive guidance on resolving security vulnerabilities.
   
6. **Cost and Licensing**: Pylint is an open-source tool, available for free usage under the GNU General Public License (GPL), making it cost-effective for individual developers and small teams. On the other hand, Veracode is a commercial tool with subscription-based pricing models, offering advanced security features and comprehensive support but at a higher cost.

In Summary, the key differences between Pylint and Veracode lie in their analysis focus, deployment methods, scalability, code security offerings, reporting capabilities, and cost structures.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Pylint	Veracode
It is a Python static code analysis tool which looks for programming errors, helps enforcing a coding standard, sniffs for code smells and offers simple refactoring suggestions.	It seamlessly integrates application security into the software lifecycle, effectively eliminating vulnerabilities during the lowest-cost point in the development/deployment chain, and blocking threats while in production.
Syntax Check;Style Check;Warnings	Statice Application Security Scanning; Dynamic Application Security Scanning
Statistics
Stacks 873	Stacks 66
Followers 97	Followers 129
Votes 17	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 Command Line 2 Spell Check strings & comments 2 Code score & directions 2 Pre-commit checks 2 IDE Integration	No community feedback yet
Integrations
FreeBSD Debian Vim Windows Mac OS X TextMate Visual Studio Komodo IDE Eclipse Visual Studio Code	Gradle Apache Maven Jenkins Bitbucket Travis CI Apache Ant Appveyor

What are some alternatives to Pylint, Veracode?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

Related Comparisons

Pylint vs Veracode: What are the differences?

# Introduction
In this Markdown, we will discuss the key differences between Pylint and Veracode, popular code analysis tools used for ensuring code quality and security.

1. **Analysis Focus**: Pylint focuses on analyzing Python code specifically, providing insights into coding standards, potential errors, and refactoring suggestions. On the other hand, Veracode extends its analysis to a wide range of programming languages beyond Python, including C/C++, Java, and more, with a strong emphasis on security vulnerabilities assessment.
   
2. **Deployment**: Pylint is typically integrated into the developer's workflow as a linter tool, running during coding to give real-time feedback and suggestions. Contrastingly, Veracode is usually employed as part of the software build pipeline or CI/CD process, allowing for automated security testing and compliance checks at each stage of development.
   
3. **Scalability**: While Pylint is suitable for small to medium-scale projects due to its ease of integration and lightweight nature, Veracode is better suited for enterprise-level applications or organizations requiring comprehensive security testing and compliance features at scale.
   
4. **Comprehensive Code Security**: Veracode offers advanced security scanning capabilities, such as static, dynamic, and software composition analysis, to identify a wide range of security vulnerabilities, including OWASP top 10 vulnerabilities, while Pylint primarily focuses on code quality and adherence to coding standards.
   
5. **Reporting and Remediation**: Veracode provides detailed reports on vulnerabilities found in the codebase, along with recommended fixes and prioritization based on severity levels, aiding developers in efficient remediation. In contrast, Pylint offers insights into code quality issues but may not provide as extensive guidance on resolving security vulnerabilities.
   
6. **Cost and Licensing**: Pylint is an open-source tool, available for free usage under the GNU General Public License (GPL), making it cost-effective for individual developers and small teams. On the other hand, Veracode is a commercial tool with subscription-based pricing models, offering advanced security features and comprehensive support but at a higher cost.

In Summary, the key differences between Pylint and Veracode lie in their analysis focus, deployment methods, scalability, code security offerings, reporting capabilities, and cost structures.

Pylint vs Veracode

Overview