QMetry vs Selenium

Overview

Selenium

Stacks16.2K

Followers12.6K

Votes527

GitHub Stars33.6K

Forks8.6K

QMetry

Stacks15

Followers34

Votes0

QMetry vs Selenium: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this document, we will discuss the key differences between QMetry and Selenium, two popular tools used in software testing.

Cost: One major difference between QMetry and Selenium is their cost. QMetry is a commercial tool and requires a paid license to use, whereas Selenium is an open-source tool and can be used free of cost. This means that organizations using QMetry may have to invest in licenses, while Selenium can be used without any additional cost.
Supported Platforms: Another difference lies in the platforms they support. QMetry is a comprehensive testing platform that supports a wide range of operating systems, browsers, and devices. It provides built-in support for test management, test case execution, and reporting. On the other hand, Selenium is primarily focused on web application testing and is mainly used for automating web browsers.
Programming Language Support: QMetry provides support for multiple programming languages such as Java, C#, Ruby, and Python. This allows testers to write their test scripts in the language they are most comfortable with. In contrast, Selenium natively supports Java, but it also provides bindings for other languages such as C#, Ruby, and Python.
Integration: QMetry offers integrations with various third-party tools such as JIRA, Jenkins, and Bamboo. This allows testers to streamline their testing process by seamlessly integrating QMetry with their existing tools and workflows. On the other hand, Selenium can be integrated with different frameworks and tools through custom code or plugins, giving testers the flexibility to choose their preferred integration method.
Test Data Management: QMetry provides features for managing test data, including data-driven testing, data parameterization, and test data provisioning. This enables testers to efficiently create, manage, and reuse test data during their testing efforts. Selenium, on the other hand, relies on external tools or frameworks for managing test data, as it primarily focuses on the automation of web browsers.
Community Support: Selenium has a large and active community of users and contributors who actively provide support, share knowledge, and contribute to its development. This means that testers using Selenium can leverage the community's expertise and resources to address issues, learn new techniques, and stay up to date with the latest trends in software testing. QMetry, being a commercial tool, has a smaller community but offers dedicated support and assistance to its users.

In summary, the key differences between QMetry and Selenium include cost (paid vs free), supported platforms (comprehensive vs web applications), programming language support (multiple vs primarily Java), integration (built-in vs custom code/plugin), test data management (built-in vs external tools/frameworks), and community support (smaller dedicated community vs larger open-source community).

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Selenium, QMetry

Shivam

Mar 5, 2020

Needs advice

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

241k views241k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Selenium	QMetry
Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.	It offers agile testing solutions for QA teams to automate testing. Use it to shorten software testing cycles
-	TEST PLAN MANAGEMENT; TEST CASE ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT; TEST EXECUTION MANAGEMENT; TEST DATA MANAGEMENT; DEFECT MANAGEMENT; CHANGE MANAGEMENT; RELEASE & BUILD MANAGEMENT.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 33.6K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 8.6K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 16.2K	Stacks 15
Followers 12.6K	Followers 34
Votes 527	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 177 Automates browsers 154 Testing 101 Essential tool for running test automation 24 Record-Playback 24 Remote Control Cons 8 Flaky tests 4 Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui) 2 Update browser drivers	Cons 1 Slow and clunky 1 Some terms and processes are confusing
Integrations
No integrations available	TestFlight UserTesting Jira TestNG

What are some alternatives to Selenium, QMetry?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Testrail

TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Related Comparisons

QMetry vs Selenium: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this document, we will discuss the key differences between QMetry and Selenium, two popular tools used in software testing.

Cost: One major difference between QMetry and Selenium is their cost. QMetry is a commercial tool and requires a paid license to use, whereas Selenium is an open-source tool and can be used free of cost. This means that organizations using QMetry may have to invest in licenses, while Selenium can be used without any additional cost.
Supported Platforms: Another difference lies in the platforms they support. QMetry is a comprehensive testing platform that supports a wide range of operating systems, browsers, and devices. It provides built-in support for test management, test case execution, and reporting. On the other hand, Selenium is primarily focused on web application testing and is mainly used for automating web browsers.
Programming Language Support: QMetry provides support for multiple programming languages such as Java, C#, Ruby, and Python. This allows testers to write their test scripts in the language they are most comfortable with. In contrast, Selenium natively supports Java, but it also provides bindings for other languages such as C#, Ruby, and Python.
Integration: QMetry offers integrations with various third-party tools such as JIRA, Jenkins, and Bamboo. This allows testers to streamline their testing process by seamlessly integrating QMetry with their existing tools and workflows. On the other hand, Selenium can be integrated with different frameworks and tools through custom code or plugins, giving testers the flexibility to choose their preferred integration method.
Test Data Management: QMetry provides features for managing test data, including data-driven testing, data parameterization, and test data provisioning. This enables testers to efficiently create, manage, and reuse test data during their testing efforts. Selenium, on the other hand, relies on external tools or frameworks for managing test data, as it primarily focuses on the automation of web browsers.
Community Support: Selenium has a large and active community of users and contributors who actively provide support, share knowledge, and contribute to its development. This means that testers using Selenium can leverage the community's expertise and resources to address issues, learn new techniques, and stay up to date with the latest trends in software testing. QMetry, being a commercial tool, has a smaller community but offers dedicated support and assistance to its users.

QMetry vs Selenium

Overview

QMetry vs Selenium: What are the differences?