StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. QMetry vs TestingBot

QMetry vs TestingBot

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

TestingBot
TestingBot
Stacks10
Followers39
Votes23
QMetry
QMetry
Stacks15
Followers34
Votes0

TestingBot vs QMetry: What are the differences?

TestingBot: Automated and manual cross browser testing. TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers; QMetry: Designed for agile testing and DevOps teams to build, manage, and deploy quality software. It offers agile testing solutions for QA teams to automate testing. Use it to shorten software testing cycles.

TestingBot and QMetry are primarily classified as "Browser Testing" and "Test Management" tools respectively.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

TestingBot
TestingBot
QMetry
QMetry

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

It offers agile testing solutions for QA teams to automate testing. Use it to shorten software testing cycles

TestingBot provides an easy service to test your website in different browsers and mobile devices.;Run automated tests on multiple browsers and operating systems, or test yourself by controlling any browser in our cloud straight from your computer.
TEST PLAN MANAGEMENT; TEST CASE ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT; TEST EXECUTION MANAGEMENT; TEST DATA MANAGEMENT; DEFECT MANAGEMENT; CHANGE MANAGEMENT; RELEASE & BUILD MANAGEMENT.
Statistics
Stacks
10
Stacks
15
Followers
39
Followers
34
Votes
23
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Good price
  • 3
    Real Devices
  • 2
    Selenium-compatible
  • 2
    Mobile support
  • 2
    Jenkins integration
Cons
  • 1
    Some terms and processes are confusing
  • 1
    Slow and clunky
Integrations
No integrations available
TestFlight
TestFlight
UserTesting
UserTesting
Jira
Jira
TestNG
TestNG

What are some alternatives to TestingBot, QMetry?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Testrail

Testrail

TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana