StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Cross Platform Mobile Development
  5. Qt vs Visual Studio App Center

Qt vs Visual Studio App Center

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Qt
Qt
Stacks464
Followers637
Votes138
Visual Studio App Center
Visual Studio App Center
Stacks113
Followers232
Votes4

Qt vs Visual Studio App Center: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Qt and Visual Studio App Center

  1. Cross-Platform Development: Qt is a popular C++ framework that allows developers to create applications that can run on multiple platforms such as Windows, Linux, macOS, Android, and iOS. On the other hand, Visual Studio App Center is a tool for building, testing, distributing, and monitoring mobile apps for iOS and Android platforms.

  2. Integrated Development Environment (IDE): Qt provides its own integrated development environment called Qt Creator, which offers features like code completion, debugging, and project management specifically tailored for Qt development. Visual Studio App Center integrates with Microsoft Visual Studio IDE, offering tools for building, managing, and deploying mobile apps smoothly.

  3. Automation and Continuous Integration: Visual Studio App Center allows for automated builds, tests, and distribution of mobile apps, making it easier to implement continuous integration and delivery processes. While Qt supports automation through tools like QMake and CMake, it does not offer the same level of continuous integration capabilities as Visual Studio App Center.

  4. Monitoring and Analytics: Visual Studio App Center provides in-depth monitoring and analytics features, allowing developers to track app performance, crash reports, user insights, and more. Qt does not have built-in tools for monitoring and analytics, requiring developers to rely on third-party solutions for tracking app metrics and performance.

  5. Community and Support: Qt has a large and active community of developers and contributors, offering extensive documentation, forums, and resources for help and support. Visual Studio App Center, being a Microsoft tool, benefits from the support of the Microsoft developer ecosystem, including forums, documentation, and direct support from Microsoft engineers.

  6. Deployment and Distribution: While both Qt and Visual Studio App Center support app deployment and distribution, Visual Studio App Center provides more streamlined processes for releasing mobile apps to app stores and managing distribution to end-users, including beta testing and release management features.

In Summary, Qt and Visual Studio App Center differ in terms of cross-platform development support, integrated development environments, automation capabilities, monitoring tools, community support, and deployment processes.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Qt
Qt
Visual Studio App Center
Visual Studio App Center

Qt, a leading cross-platform application and UI framework. With Qt, you can develop applications once and deploy to leading desktop, embedded & mobile targets.

Automate the lifecycle of your iOS, Android, Windows, and macOS apps. Connect your repo and within minutes build in the cloud, test on thousands of real devices, distribute to beta testers and app stores, and monitor real-world usage with crash and analytics data. All in one place.

-
Build; Test; Distribute; Crashes; Diagnostics; Analytics; Push; CD/CI;
Statistics
Stacks
464
Stacks
113
Followers
637
Followers
232
Votes
138
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 17
    High Performance
  • 13
    Declarative, easy and flexible UI
  • 12
    Performance
  • 12
    Cross platform
  • 9
    Fast prototyping
Cons
  • 5
    Paid
  • 4
    C++ is not so productive
  • 2
    Lack of community support
  • 1
    Not detailed documentation
  • 1
    Lack of libraries
Pros
  • 1
    For Mobile apps diagnostics and tracking
  • 1
    Bug tracking integration
  • 1
    Show error issues for mobile devices
  • 1
    Slack integration
Integrations
No integrations available
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps
Slack
Slack

What are some alternatives to Qt, Visual Studio App Center?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Ionic

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

Flutter

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Xamarin

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

NativeScript

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase