Quasar Framework vs Semantic UI

Overview

Semantic UI

Stacks992

Followers1.5K

Votes673

GitHub Stars51.2K

Forks4.9K

Quasar Framework

Stacks451

Followers771

Votes404

GitHub Stars26.9K

Forks3.7K

Quasar Framework vs Semantic UI: What are the differences?

Component Library: Quasar Framework offers a comprehensive set of pre-built components for web development, including a wide range of design options and functionalities. In contrast, Semantic UI provides a smaller set of components with a focus on simplicity and ease of use.
Supported Platforms: Quasar Framework is primarily designed for building responsive websites and mobile applications using Vue.js, while Semantic UI is a front-end development framework that can be used with any JavaScript framework, allowing for more flexibility in project choices.
Theming and Customization: Quasar Framework provides a built-in theming system that allows for easy customization of styles and colors across the entire project. Semantic UI also offers customization options but may require more manual adjustments to achieve a desired look and feel.
Documentation and Community Support: Quasar Framework has extensive documentation and a large community of users, making it easier for developers to find solutions to common issues and learn new features. Semantic UI, on the other hand, may have a smaller community and less comprehensive documentation available.
Performance and Bundle Size: Quasar Framework is known for its performance optimization techniques and smaller bundle sizes, making it a suitable choice for projects where speed and efficiency are critical. Semantic UI may have larger bundle sizes and may require additional optimizations to achieve better performance.
Popularity and Adoption: Quasar Framework has gained popularity among Vue.js developers for its powerful features and ease of use, leading to a growing number of projects using this framework. Semantic UI, while still widely used, may not have the same level of adoption as Quasar Framework within the Vue.js community.

In Summary, Quasar Framework and Semantic UI differ in terms of component library, supported platforms, theming and customization, documentation and community support, performance and bundle size, and popularity and adoption within the Vue.js community.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Semantic UI	Quasar Framework
Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.	Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.
Build Responsive Layouts Easier;Self Explanatory;Tag ambivalent;Powerful tools for expressing groups and collections;Portable and self-contained	SPAs (Single Page App); SSR (Server-side Rendered App); PWAs (Progressive Web App); Mobile apps (Android, iOS, …); Electron; Vue.js; Full RTL support; Persian calendar; Material design 2; Complete documentation; Unit test ready
Statistics
GitHub Stars 51.2K	GitHub Stars 26.9K
GitHub Forks 4.9K	GitHub Forks 3.7K
Stacks 992	Stacks 451
Followers 1.5K	Followers 771
Votes 673	Votes 404
Pros & Cons
Pros 157 Easy to use and looks elegant 92 Variety of components 64 Themes 61 Has out-of-the-box widgets i would actually use 57 Semantic, duh Cons 5 Outdated build tool (gulp 3)) 3 Poor accessibility support 3 HTML is not semantic (see list component) 2 Javascript is tied to jquery	Pros 59 Excellent documentation 44 Deploy one codebase to web, desktop, mobile, and more 40 Lots of UI components 39 Extensive collection of components 33 Being able to bundle for almost all platform is awesome Cons 4 Stackoverflow 1.5k Questions
Integrations
AngularJS React Ember.js Meteor	Linux Electron macOS Windows Vue.js Material Design

What are some alternatives to Semantic UI, Quasar Framework?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Vuetify

Vuetify is a component framework for Vue.js 2. It aims to provide clean, semantic and reusable components that make building your application a breeze. Vuetify utilizes Google's Material Design design pattern, taking cues from other popular frameworks such as Materialize.css, Material Design Lite, Semantic UI and Bootstrap 4.

Related Comparisons

Quasar Framework vs Semantic UI: What are the differences?

Component Library: Quasar Framework offers a comprehensive set of pre-built components for web development, including a wide range of design options and functionalities. In contrast, Semantic UI provides a smaller set of components with a focus on simplicity and ease of use.
Supported Platforms: Quasar Framework is primarily designed for building responsive websites and mobile applications using Vue.js, while Semantic UI is a front-end development framework that can be used with any JavaScript framework, allowing for more flexibility in project choices.
Theming and Customization: Quasar Framework provides a built-in theming system that allows for easy customization of styles and colors across the entire project. Semantic UI also offers customization options but may require more manual adjustments to achieve a desired look and feel.
Documentation and Community Support: Quasar Framework has extensive documentation and a large community of users, making it easier for developers to find solutions to common issues and learn new features. Semantic UI, on the other hand, may have a smaller community and less comprehensive documentation available.
Performance and Bundle Size: Quasar Framework is known for its performance optimization techniques and smaller bundle sizes, making it a suitable choice for projects where speed and efficiency are critical. Semantic UI may have larger bundle sizes and may require additional optimizations to achieve better performance.
Popularity and Adoption: Quasar Framework has gained popularity among Vue.js developers for its powerful features and ease of use, leading to a growing number of projects using this framework. Semantic UI, while still widely used, may not have the same level of adoption as Quasar Framework within the Vue.js community.

Quasar Framework vs Semantic UI

Overview