Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!


+ 1

+ 1
Add tool

Quokka vs Wallaby.js: What are the differences?


This Markdown code provides a comparison between Quokka and Wallaby.js, highlighting the key differences between these two JavaScript development tools extensively used for code testing and debugging.

  1. Live coding functionality: Quokka is primarily known for its live coding feature, which allows developers to see the output of their code as they write it in real-time. This feature significantly speeds up the development process and enhances code efficiency by providing immediate feedback on code changes. On the other hand, Wallaby.js does not offer live coding functionality out of the box. It focuses more on test automation and providing comprehensive code coverage reports.

  2. Test runner and code coverage: Wallaby.js primarily serves as a powerful test runner for JavaScript and TypeScript. It excels in providing an extensive suite of testing features, including debugging support, continuous testing, and code coverage reports. Quokka, although capable of running tests, is not as comprehensive in terms of test automation and code coverage analysis. Its main focus is on providing live coding functionality and enabling code experiments.

  3. Supported IDEs: Quokka offers support for a wider range of Integrated Development Environments (IDEs) compared to Wallaby.js. Quokka seamlessly integrates with popular IDEs like Visual Studio Code, JetBrains WebStorm, IntelliJ IDEA, and Atom, making it accessible to a larger developer community. Wallaby.js, on the other hand, provides support predominantly to JetBrains IDEs such as WebStorm, PhpStorm, and IntelliJ IDEA.

  4. Price and licensing: Quokka offers a free version with limited features, perfect for individual developers or small-scale projects. However, to unlock the full potential of Quokka, a paid license is required, which comes at a cost. On the contrary, Wallaby.js follows a subscription-based payment model. Pricing for Wallaby.js depends on the number of developers using it and the specific features required.

  5. IntelliSense and error checking: Wallaby.js provides more advanced static analysis capabilities, such as intelligent code completion (IntelliSense) and error checking. It leverages the power of TypeScript language services to offer better code insights and automated error detection. Quokka, although it provides some level of IntelliSense, is not as robust as Wallaby.js in terms of static code analysis and error checking.

  6. Community and support: Both Quokka and Wallaby.js have active and supportive communities. However, Quokka, being around for a longer time, has a more established and extensive community. This means more readily available resources, tutorials, and plugins that cater to Quokka users. Wallaby.js, being relatively newer, also has a growing community but may have fewer community-contributed tools or resources.

In summary, Quokka and Wallaby.js differ in terms of live coding functionality, test runner capabilities, supported IDEs, pricing models, code analysis features, and community support. Choose Quokka if you prioritize live coding and experimentation, while Wallaby.js is a better fit for test automation, code coverage analysis, and advanced static analysis.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
No Stats

What is Quokka?

You send great emails but sometimes it gets lost in a user’s inbox. Quokka shows a retargeting message to those who ignored your message so that they will never miss an important update from you.

What is Wallaby.js?

It is an intelligent test runner for JavaScript that continuously runs your tests. It reports code coverage and other results directly to your code editor immediately as you change your code.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Quokka?
What companies use Wallaby.js?
    No companies found
    See which teams inside your own company are using Quokka or Wallaby.js.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Quokka?
    What tools integrate with Wallaby.js?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Quokka and Wallaby.js?
    Automate your store in no time: Wombat is an ecommerce integration platform that quickly connects your storefront with all your favorite 3rd party services. Comprehensive enough for large ecommerce stores and easy enough for small merchants
    Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.
    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.
    Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.
    GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.
    See all alternatives