StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. State Management Library
  5. Redux vs Redux Observable

Redux vs Redux Observable

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Redux
Redux
Stacks32.0K
Followers23.6K
Votes674
Redux Observable
Redux Observable
Stacks105
Followers45
Votes0

Redux vs Redux Observable: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Redux and Redux Observable. These two libraries are commonly used for managing state in JavaScript applications.

  1. Redux: Redux is a predictable state container for JavaScript apps. It provides a centralized store for managing the application state and a set of rules for updating that state in a predictable manner. Redux follows a unidirectional data flow pattern, where actions are dispatched to modify the state, and components subscribe to updates in the state to reflect the changes.

  2. Redux Observable: Redux Observable is an extension of Redux that introduces the concept of observables for handling asynchronous actions. It is built on top of the reactive programming library called RxJS. Redux Observable allows you to express complex asynchronous logic using a declarative, functional programming style.

  3. Difference 1: Middleware: Redux uses middleware, such as thunk or saga, to handle asynchronous actions. These middleware intercept the dispatched actions and perform additional logic before reaching the reducer. On the other hand, Redux Observable eliminates the need for middleware by using observables. With Redux Observable, you can handle async actions directly in your epics (observables) without the need for additional middleware.

  4. Difference 2: Declarative vs Imperative: Redux follows an imperative style of programming, where you define actions and reducers to modify the state. Redux Observable, on the other hand, follows a declarative style of programming with the use of observables. In Redux Observable, you define epics that listen to specific actions and respond with new actions, allowing you to express complex asynchronous logic in a more concise and readable manner.

  5. Difference 3: Granularity: Redux operates at a fine-grained level, requiring you to dispatch actions for every state mutation. This can lead to more verbosity and boilerplate code, especially for large applications. Redux Observable, on the other hand, allows you to handle multiple related actions in a single epic. This provides a higher level of abstraction and reduces the amount of code needed to manage complex state changes.

  6. Difference 4: Composition: With Redux Observable, you can easily compose multiple epics together to handle different parts of your application's state. This allows for better separation of concerns and modularity. In Redux, composing reducers can be more challenging and often requires the use of additional libraries or patterns.

  7. Difference 5: Testing: Testing asynchronous code in Redux can be cumbersome, as you need to mock the asynchronous dependencies and manually dispatch actions in the correct order. Redux Observable simplifies testing by providing a way to test your epics in isolation. You can easily assert on the emitted actions and test the logic of your epics without the need for complex setup.

In summary, Redux is a predictable state container that uses middleware for managing async actions, while Redux Observable extends Redux with observables for handling asynchronous logic in a declarative manner. Redux operates at a fine-grained level, while Redux Observable provides a higher level of abstraction. Redux Observable also simplifies testing and allows for easier composition of epics.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Redux
Redux
Redux Observable
Redux Observable

It helps you write applications that behave consistently, run in different environments (client, server, and native), and are easy to test. t provides a great experience, such as live code editing combined with a time traveling debugger.

It allows developers to dispatch a function that returns an observable, promise or iterable of action(s). Compose and cancel async actions to create side effects and more.

Predictable state; Easy testing; Works with other view layers besides React
Redux async actions;Rest requests with Redux;ReactiveX standards
Statistics
Stacks
32.0K
Stacks
105
Followers
23.6K
Followers
45
Votes
674
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 191
    State is predictable
  • 150
    Plays well with React and others
  • 126
    State stored in a single object tree
  • 79
    Hot reloading out of the box
  • 74
    Allows for time travel
Cons
  • 13
    Lots of boilerplate
  • 6
    Verbose
  • 5
    Steep learning curve
  • 5
    Design
  • 4
    Steeper learning curve than MobX
No community feedback yet
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
React
React
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Redux, Redux Observable?

MobX

MobX

MobX is a battle tested library that makes state management simple and scalable by transparently applying functional reactive programming (TFRP). React and MobX together are a powerful combination. React renders the application state by providing mechanisms to translate it into a tree of renderable components. MobX provides the mechanism to store and update the application state that React then uses.

Akka

Akka

Akka is a toolkit and runtime for building highly concurrent, distributed, and resilient message-driven applications on the JVM.

Orleans

Orleans

Orleans is a framework that provides a straightforward approach to building distributed high-scale computing applications, without the need to learn and apply complex concurrency or other scaling patterns. It was created by Microsoft Research and designed for use in the cloud.

Zustand

Zustand

Small, fast and scaleable bearbones state-management solution. Has a comfy api based on hooks, that isn't boilerplatey or opinionated, but still just enough to be explicit and flux-like.

Effector

Effector

It is an effective multi-store state manager for Javascript apps, that allows you to manage data in complex applications.

RxJS

RxJS

RxJS is a library for reactive programming using Observables, to make it easier to compose asynchronous or callback-based code. This project is a rewrite of Reactive-Extensions/RxJS with better performance, better modularity, better debuggable call stacks, while staying mostly backwards compatible, with some breaking changes that reduce the API surface.

Netty

Netty

Netty is a NIO client server framework which enables quick and easy development of network applications such as protocol servers and clients. It greatly simplifies and streamlines network programming such as TCP and UDP socket server.

Finagle

Finagle

Finagle is an extensible RPC system for the JVM, used to construct high-concurrency servers. Finagle implements uniform client and server APIs for several protocols, and is designed for high performance and concurrency.

redux-saga

redux-saga

An alternative side effect model for Redux apps

vuex

vuex

Vuex is a state management pattern + library for Vue.js applications. It serves as a centralized store for all the components in an application, with rules ensuring that the state can only be mutated in a predictable fashion. It also integrates with Vue's official devtools extension to provide advanced features such as zero-config time-travel debugging and state snapshot export / import.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase