StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Companies
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

API StatusChangelog
  1. Stackups
  2. Stackups
  3. RocketChat vs Telegram

RocketChat vs Telegram

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

RocketChat
RocketChat
Stacks372
Followers542
Votes324
GitHub Stars43.8K
Forks12.4K
Telegram
Telegram
Stacks751
Followers634
Votes51

RocketChat vs Telegram : What are the differences?

## Introduction

RocketChat and Telegram are two popular messaging platforms that offer different features and functionalities. Below are the key differences between the two:

1. **End-to-End Encryption**: Telegram offers end-to-end encryption as an optional feature for secret chats, while RocketChat does not provide end-to-end encryption by default. Users of RocketChat need to rely on third-party plugins for secure communication.

2. **Customization and Self-Hosting**: RocketChat gives users the flexibility to customize their chat platform and supports self-hosting, allowing organizations to have full control over their data and privacy. In contrast, Telegram is a cloud-based service with limited customization options.

3. **User Interface and Experience**: Telegram has a simpler and more user-friendly interface, making it easier for users to navigate and use the platform. RocketChat, on the other hand, offers more robust features and customization options, but may have a steeper learning curve for new users.

4. **Integration and Extensibility**: RocketChat provides a wide range of integrations with popular business tools and services, making it a preferred choice for businesses and organizations. While Telegram offers a more straightforward messaging experience, it lacks the extensive integration capabilities of RocketChat.

5. **Community and Support**: RocketChat has a strong community of developers and contributors, providing regular updates, bug fixes, and support to users. Telegram also has a large user base, but the level of community support may vary based on the region and user base.

6. **File Sharing and Collaboration Tools**: RocketChat offers advanced file sharing and collaboration tools, such as screen sharing, video conferencing, and collaborative document editing. In comparison, Telegram focuses more on messaging and communication features, with limited collaboration tools.

In Summary, RocketChat and Telegram differ in terms of encryption, customization, user interface, integration capabilities, community support, and collaboration tools.

Advice on RocketChat, Telegram

Stefan
Stefan

CEO / CTO at DROOM! #wirmachenweb #vienna

Feb 10, 2020

Decided

We chose RocketChat over other communications suites like Cliq or Slack mainly because we can self-host it on our own infrastructure. Since we have quite some projects going on which demand that we stay in touch with a lot of different stakeholders, pricing was an issue, too. With RocketChat, we have a huge set of features basically for free, RC offers apps for all major devices and systems and overall, we're very happy with it. The only downside is the limited amount of apps and integrations, but we can make due with what we have available.

159k views159k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

RocketChat
RocketChat
Telegram
Telegram

Rocket.Chat is a Web Chat Server, developed in JavaScript, using the Meteor fullstack framework. It is a great solution for communities and companies wanting to privately host their own chat service or for developers looking forward to build and evolve their own chat platforms.

Users can send messages and exchange photos, videos, stickers, audio and files of any type. It provides instant messaging, simple, fast, secure and synced across all your devices.

BYOS (bring your own server);Multiple Rooms;Direct Messages;Private Groups;Public Channels;Desktop Notifications;Mentions;Avatars;Markdown;Emojis;Transcripts / History;I18n - Internationalization
Simple; Fast; Secure; Expressive; Social
Statistics
GitHub Stars
43.8K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
12.4K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
372
Stacks
751
Followers
542
Followers
634
Votes
324
Votes
51
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 72
    Open source
  • 38
    Can be deployed on premise
  • 32
    Byos (bring your own server)
  • 30
    Faster than Slack
  • 21
    Mobile app for iphone, ipad, and ipod touch
Cons
  • 1
    No full markdown support
  • 1
    Not as well-known as others like it
  • 1
    Hard to upgrade
  • 1
    Poor user customization
  • 1
    Limited message history on SaaS
Pros
  • 16
    Lightweight
  • 8
    Free
  • 8
    Great bot API
  • 8
    Unlimited history
  • 4
    Can hide phone number
Cons
  • 3
    Requires phone number
  • 3
    Notification customisation is limited
  • 2
    No video call
Integrations
Confluence
Confluence
GitHub
GitHub
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
GitLab
GitLab
Prometheus
Prometheus
Jira
Jira
Amazon SNS
Amazon SNS
GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise
Hubot
Hubot
Docker Cloud
Docker Cloud
Linux
Linux
macOS
macOS
Windows
Windows

What are some alternatives to RocketChat, Telegram ?

Slack

Slack

Imagine all your team communication in one place, instantly searchable, available wherever you go. That’s Slack. All your messages. All your files. And everything from Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub and dozens of other services. All together.

HipChat

HipChat

HipChat is a hosted private chat service for your company or team. Invite colleagues to share ideas and files in persistent group chat rooms. Get your team off AIM, Google Talk, and Skype — HipChat was built for business.

Zulip

Zulip

Zulip is powerful, open source team chat that combines the immediacy of real-time chat with the productivity benefits of threaded conversations. Zulip allows busy managers and others in meetings all day to participate in their teams chats.

Mattermost

Mattermost

Mattermost is modern communication from behind your firewall.

Gitter

Gitter

Free chat rooms for your public repositories. A bit like IRC only smarter. Chats for private repositories as well as organisations.

Flowdock

Flowdock

Flowdock is a web-based team chat service that integrates with your tools to provide a window into your team's activities. With the team inbox, everyone on your team can stay up to date. Stay connected with Flowdock's iOS and Android apps.

Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams

See content and chat history anytime, including team chats with Skype that are visible to the whole team. Private group chats are available for smaller group conversations.

Keybase Teams

Keybase Teams

Keybase is for anyone. Imagine a Slack for the whole world, except end-to-end encrypted across all your devices. Or a Team Dropbox where the server can't leak your files or be hacked.

Fleep

Fleep

Leave email behind and manage all conversations with your team, partners and clients in Fleep. If some of them are not Fleep users yet, they will receive all messages as normal emails.

Let's Chat

Let's Chat

Let's Chat is a persistent messaging application that runs on Node.js and MongoDB. It's designed to be easily deployable and fits well with small, intimate teams. It's free (MIT licensed) and ships with killer features such as LDAP/Kerberos authentication, a REST-like API and XMPP support.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack