Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Apache RocketMQ
Apache RocketMQ

10
20
+ 1
4
Sandglass
Sandglass

1
4
+ 1
0
Add tool

Apache RocketMQ vs Sandglass: What are the differences?

Developers describe Apache RocketMQ as "Open source distributed messaging and streaming data platform". Apache RocketMQ is a distributed messaging and streaming platform with low latency, high performance and reliability, trillion-level capacity and flexible scalability. On the other hand, Sandglass is detailed as "Distributed, scalable, persistent time-sorted message queue". A distributed, horizontally scalable, persistent, time ordered message queue. Developed to support asynchronous tasks and message scheduling which makes it suitable for usage as a task queue.

Apache RocketMQ and Sandglass belong to "Message Queue" category of the tech stack.

Apache RocketMQ and Sandglass are both open source tools. Apache RocketMQ with 8.25K GitHub stars and 4.23K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Sandglass with 1.52K GitHub stars and 40 GitHub forks.

What is Apache RocketMQ?

Apache RocketMQ is a distributed messaging and streaming platform with low latency, high performance and reliability, trillion-level capacity and flexible scalability.

What is Sandglass?

A distributed, horizontally scalable, persistent, time ordered message queue. Developed to support asynchronous tasks and message scheduling which makes it suitable for usage as a task queue.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Apache RocketMQ?
Why do developers choose Sandglass?
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

      Be the first to leave a con
        Be the first to leave a con
        What companies use Apache RocketMQ?
        What companies use Sandglass?
          No companies found

          Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

          What tools integrate with Apache RocketMQ?
          What tools integrate with Sandglass?

          Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

          What are some alternatives to Apache RocketMQ and Sandglass?
          Kafka
          Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.
          RabbitMQ
          RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.
          Amazon SQS
          Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.
          Celery
          Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.
          ActiveMQ
          Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.
          See all alternatives
          Decisions about Apache RocketMQ and Sandglass
          No stack decisions found
          Interest over time
          Reviews of Apache RocketMQ and Sandglass
          No reviews found
          How developers use Apache RocketMQ and Sandglass
          No items found
          How much does Apache RocketMQ cost?
          How much does Sandglass cost?
          Pricing unavailable
          Pricing unavailable
          News about Apache RocketMQ
          More news
          News about Sandglass
          More news