Rundeck vs StackStorm

Overview

Rundeck

Stacks204

Followers343

Votes7

StackStorm

Stacks80

Followers186

Votes31

GitHub Stars6.4K

Forks774

Rundeck vs StackStorm: What are the differences?

Integration capabilities: Rundeck has a robust integration capability with various services and tools through plugins, allowing users to easily automate tasks across different systems. StackStorm, on the other hand, offers a built-in integration with a wide range of popular tools and services, eliminating the need for additional plugins.
Policy and rules management: Rundeck provides a rule-based approach to manage policies, allowing users to define fine-grained access controls and permissions for different operations. StackStorm, however, offers a more flexible and powerful rules engine that allows for complex event-driven automation and decision-making based on various conditions.
Workflow and Job Execution: Rundeck focuses on providing a user-friendly interface for managing and executing workflows and jobs, with features such as job scheduling and parallel execution. StackStorm, on the other hand, is designed to provide a powerful event-driven automation platform, allowing for sophisticated workflows that can be triggered by various events and actions.
Community and support: Rundeck has a larger and more active community, providing a wealth of resources, plugins, and community-contributed integrations. StackStorm, while having a smaller community, is backed by an enterprise vendor with commercial support options available.
Scalability and performance: Rundeck is known for its scalability and performance, capable of handling large numbers of jobs and concurrent executions. StackStorm, although also scalable, focuses more on event-driven automation rather than individual job execution performance.
Ease of installation and setup: Rundeck provides a simple and straightforward installation process and has detailed documentation for easy setup. StackStorm, on the other hand, may require more manual configuration and has a steeper learning curve for initial setup and configuration.

In summary, Rundeck and StackStorm differ in their integration capabilities, rules management, workflow and job execution approach, community and support, scalability and performance, as well as ease of installation and setup.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Rundeck	StackStorm
A self-service operations platform used for support tasks, enterprise job scheduling, deployment, and more.	StackStorm is a platform for integration and automation across services and tools. It ties together your existing infrastructure and application environment so you can more easily automate that environment -- with a particular focus on taking actions in response to events.
-	Automations tie events to actions you’d like to take, using a rules engine and, if you want, comprehensive workflow. Automations are your operational patterns summarized as code.;StackStorm automations work either by starting with your existing scripts – just add simple meta data – or by authoring the automations within StackStorm.;Automations are the heart of StackStorm – they allow you to share operational patterns, boost productivity, and automate away the routine.;CLI, REST API + Python Bindings
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 6.4K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 774
Stacks 204	Stacks 80
Followers 343	Followers 186
Votes 7	Votes 31
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 Role based access control 3 Easy to understand 1 Doesn't need containers	Pros 7 Auto-remediation 5 Integrations 4 Automation 4 Complex workflows 3 Open source Cons 3 Complexity 1 There are not enough sources of information
Integrations
Ansible Jenkins	Mailgun VMware vSphere Rackspace Cloud Servers Vault Octopus Deploy Ansible Duo PhantomJS Yammer Cassandra

What are some alternatives to Rundeck, StackStorm?

Ansible

Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.

Chef

Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.

Terraform

With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

Capistrano

Capistrano is a remote server automation tool. It supports the scripting and execution of arbitrary tasks, and includes a set of sane-default deployment workflows.

Puppet Labs

Puppet is an automated administrative engine for your Linux, Unix, and Windows systems and performs administrative tasks (such as adding users, installing packages, and updating server configurations) based on a centralized specification.

Salt

Salt is a new approach to infrastructure management. Easy enough to get running in minutes, scalable enough to manage tens of thousands of servers, and fast enough to communicate with them in seconds. Salt delivers a dynamic communication bus for infrastructures that can be used for orchestration, remote execution, configuration management and much more.

Fabric

Fabric is a Python (2.5-2.7) library and command-line tool for streamlining the use of SSH for application deployment or systems administration tasks. It provides a basic suite of operations for executing local or remote shell commands (normally or via sudo) and uploading/downloading files, as well as auxiliary functionality such as prompting the running user for input, or aborting execution.

AWS OpsWorks

Start from templates for common technologies like Ruby, Node.JS, PHP, and Java, or build your own using Chef recipes to install software packages and perform any task that you can script. AWS OpsWorks can scale your application using automatic load-based or time-based scaling and maintain the health of your application by detecting failed instances and replacing them. You have full control of deployments and automation of each component

cPanel

It is an industry leading hosting platform with world-class support. It is globally empowering hosting providers through fully-automated point-and-click hosting platform by hosting-centric professionals

Webmin

It is a web-based interface for system administration for Unix. Using any modern web browser, you can setup user accounts, Apache, DNS, file sharing and much more. It removes the need to manually edit Unix configuration files.

Related Comparisons

Rundeck vs StackStorm: What are the differences?

Integration capabilities: Rundeck has a robust integration capability with various services and tools through plugins, allowing users to easily automate tasks across different systems. StackStorm, on the other hand, offers a built-in integration with a wide range of popular tools and services, eliminating the need for additional plugins.
Policy and rules management: Rundeck provides a rule-based approach to manage policies, allowing users to define fine-grained access controls and permissions for different operations. StackStorm, however, offers a more flexible and powerful rules engine that allows for complex event-driven automation and decision-making based on various conditions.
Workflow and Job Execution: Rundeck focuses on providing a user-friendly interface for managing and executing workflows and jobs, with features such as job scheduling and parallel execution. StackStorm, on the other hand, is designed to provide a powerful event-driven automation platform, allowing for sophisticated workflows that can be triggered by various events and actions.
Community and support: Rundeck has a larger and more active community, providing a wealth of resources, plugins, and community-contributed integrations. StackStorm, while having a smaller community, is backed by an enterprise vendor with commercial support options available.
Scalability and performance: Rundeck is known for its scalability and performance, capable of handling large numbers of jobs and concurrent executions. StackStorm, although also scalable, focuses more on event-driven automation rather than individual job execution performance.
Ease of installation and setup: Rundeck provides a simple and straightforward installation process and has detailed documentation for easy setup. StackStorm, on the other hand, may require more manual configuration and has a steeper learning curve for initial setup and configuration.

Rundeck vs StackStorm

Overview