Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Rundeck

202
343
+ 1
7
StackStorm

79
185
+ 1
31
Add tool

Rundeck vs StackStorm: What are the differences?

  1. Integration capabilities: Rundeck has a robust integration capability with various services and tools through plugins, allowing users to easily automate tasks across different systems. StackStorm, on the other hand, offers a built-in integration with a wide range of popular tools and services, eliminating the need for additional plugins.
  2. Policy and rules management: Rundeck provides a rule-based approach to manage policies, allowing users to define fine-grained access controls and permissions for different operations. StackStorm, however, offers a more flexible and powerful rules engine that allows for complex event-driven automation and decision-making based on various conditions.
  3. Workflow and Job Execution: Rundeck focuses on providing a user-friendly interface for managing and executing workflows and jobs, with features such as job scheduling and parallel execution. StackStorm, on the other hand, is designed to provide a powerful event-driven automation platform, allowing for sophisticated workflows that can be triggered by various events and actions.
  4. Community and support: Rundeck has a larger and more active community, providing a wealth of resources, plugins, and community-contributed integrations. StackStorm, while having a smaller community, is backed by an enterprise vendor with commercial support options available.
  5. Scalability and performance: Rundeck is known for its scalability and performance, capable of handling large numbers of jobs and concurrent executions. StackStorm, although also scalable, focuses more on event-driven automation rather than individual job execution performance.
  6. Ease of installation and setup: Rundeck provides a simple and straightforward installation process and has detailed documentation for easy setup. StackStorm, on the other hand, may require more manual configuration and has a steeper learning curve for initial setup and configuration.

In summary, Rundeck and StackStorm differ in their integration capabilities, rules management, workflow and job execution approach, community and support, scalability and performance, as well as ease of installation and setup.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Rundeck
Pros of StackStorm
  • 3
    Role based access control
  • 3
    Easy to understand
  • 1
    Doesn't need containers
  • 7
    Auto-remediation
  • 5
    Integrations
  • 4
    Automation
  • 4
    Complex workflows
  • 3
    Open source
  • 2
    Beautiful UI
  • 2
    ChatOps
  • 2
    Python
  • 1
    Extensibility
  • 1
    Slack

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Rundeck
Cons of StackStorm
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 3
      Complexity
    • 1
      There are not enough sources of information

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What companies use Rundeck?
    What companies use StackStorm?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Rundeck?
    What tools integrate with StackStorm?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Rundeck and StackStorm?
    Airplane
    It is a developer-centric approach to building internal UIs and workflows. Turn APIs, SQL queries, and scripts into apps for the entire team.
    Jenkins
    In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.
    Ansible
    Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.
    Airflow
    Use Airflow to author workflows as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) of tasks. The Airflow scheduler executes your tasks on an array of workers while following the specified dependencies. Rich command lines utilities makes performing complex surgeries on DAGs a snap. The rich user interface makes it easy to visualize pipelines running in production, monitor progress and troubleshoot issues when needed.
    Puppet Labs
    Puppet is an automated administrative engine for your Linux, Unix, and Windows systems and performs administrative tasks (such as adding users, installing packages, and updating server configurations) based on a centralized specification.
    See all alternatives