StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Monitoring
  4. Monitoring Tools
  5. Supervisord vs runit

Supervisord vs runit

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Supervisord
Supervisord
Stacks117
Followers112
Votes0
GitHub Stars8.9K
Forks1.3K
runit
runit
Stacks4
Followers10
Votes0

Supervisord vs runit: What are the differences?

## Key Differences between Supervisord and runit

<Write Introduction here>

1. **Process Management**: Supervisord is primarily designed for managing multiple processes within a single system, providing control, monitoring, and restarting capabilities for each process separately. In contrast, runit focuses on managing system services and daemons, enabling more efficient system initialization and management.
2. **Configuration**: Supervisord uses a declarative configuration file format that defines the processes to manage and their specific configuration parameters. On the other hand, runit utilizes a directory-based configuration approach, where each service is represented by a separate directory containing the necessary configuration and runtime scripts.
3. **Logging**: Supervisord supports customizable logging configurations for each managed process, allowing users to define log file locations and rotation settings based on their requirements. In contrast, runit follows a simpler logging approach that typically relies on system-wide logging utilities like syslog for managing log outputs.
4. **Dependency Handling**: Supervisord lacks built-in support for managing service dependencies, requiring users to define custom logic within their process configurations to handle inter-process dependencies. In contrast, runit includes a mechanism for defining service dependencies explicitly, ensuring proper startup order and service coordination within the system.
5. **Community and Development**: Supervisord has a larger community and ecosystem with more extensive documentation and third-party integrations available, making it a popular choice for process management needs. On the other hand, runit is known for its simplicity, lightweight design, and robustness, appealing to users looking for a minimalistic and reliable init system alternative.
6. **System Integration**: Supervisord is more commonly used in user-controlled environments and development setups, providing finer-grained process control and monitoring capabilities for individual users and applications. In contrast, runit is often preferred in production servers and embedded systems, where streamlined service management and system initialization processes are prioritized for performance and stability.

In Summary, Supervisord and runit differ in their approach to process management, configuration handling, logging mechanisms, dependency management, community support, and system integration, catering to different user preferences and use cases.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Supervisord
Supervisord
runit
runit

It allows its users to monitor and control a number of processes on UNIX-like operating systems. It shares some of the same goals of programs like launchd, daemontools, and runit. it is meant to be used to control processes related to a project or a customer, and is meant to start like any other program at boot time.

It is a cross-platform Unix init scheme with service supervision, a replacement for sysvinit, and other init schemes. It runs on GNU/Linux, *BSD, MacOSX, Solaris, and can easily be adapted to other Unix operating systems.

-
Cross-platform ;Service supervision;Easily be adapted to other Unix operating systems
Statistics
GitHub Stars
8.9K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.3K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
117
Stacks
4
Followers
112
Followers
10
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
macOS
macOS
FreeBSD
FreeBSD
Linux
Linux
Linux
Linux
FreeBSD
FreeBSD
Gentoo Linux
Gentoo Linux
macOS
macOS
Ubuntu
Ubuntu
OpenBSD
OpenBSD

What are some alternatives to Supervisord, runit?

Grafana

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Sidekiq

Sidekiq

Sidekiq uses threads to handle many jobs at the same time in the same process. It does not require Rails but will integrate tightly with Rails 3/4 to make background processing dead simple.

Kibana

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Netdata

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Beanstalkd

Beanstalkd

Beanstalks's interface is generic, but was originally designed for reducing the latency of page views in high-volume web applications by running time-consuming tasks asynchronously.

Zabbix

Zabbix

Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.

Sensu

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Graphite

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot