RxDB vs Scylla: What are the differences?
Introduction:
1. **Data Storage Model**: RxDB is a client-side database that stores data in the user’s browser, while Scylla is a distributed database designed for high availability and performance in server-side environments.
2. **Query Language**: RxDB uses query language similar to MongoDB, allowing developers to use familiar syntax for querying data in the database, whereas Scylla uses CQL (Cassandra Query Language) which is specific to Cassandra-like databases.
3. **Replication**: Scylla offers built-in support for multi-datacenter replication, making it suitable for geographically distributed applications, whereas RxDB does not provide native support for replication across multiple databases.
4. **Scale**: Scylla is designed to scale horizontally by adding more server nodes to increase performance and capacity, while RxDB is limited to a single client-side instance and does not support horizontal scaling.
5. **Consistency**: RxDB offers ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) guarantees on the client-side, ensuring data consistency within the browser, whereas Scylla provides tunable consistency levels to balance between data availability and consistency in distributed environments.
6. **Deployment**: RxDB is typically deployed as part of a client-side application using web technologies, whereas Scylla is deployed on server machines to handle large-scale data processing and storage.
In Summary, RxDB is best suited for client-side applications with limited data storage needs, while Scylla is ideal for server-side applications requiring high availability, scalability, and distributed data management capabilities.