Secureframe vs Wazuh

Overview

Wazuh

Stacks143

Followers336

Votes4

GitHub Stars13.8K

Forks2.0K

Secureframe

Stacks3

Followers10

Votes0

Secureframe vs Wazuh: What are the differences?

Integration with other tools: Secureframe offers integrations with various tools like Slack, JIRA, and GitHub, providing a seamless workflow for security operations. On the other hand, Wazuh focuses more on its own centralized monitoring and security capabilities without as extensive integrations with third-party tools.
Compliance Management: Secureframe specifically focuses on helping companies achieve and maintain compliance with various frameworks like SOC 2, HIPAA, and ISO 27001 by providing tailored workflows and documentation. In contrast, Wazuh does not place the same emphasis on compliance management and documentation for specific regulatory standards.
User Interface and User Experience (UI/UX): Secureframe boasts a user-friendly and intuitive UI/UX design aimed at simplifying the security management process for users. Wazuh, while functional, may not offer the same level of user-friendly interface and experience, potentially requiring more training or familiarity for users to navigate effectively.
Automated Workflows: Secureframe streamlines security operations by offering automated workflows for tasks such as security incident response, vulnerability management, and audit preparation. Wazuh, while capable of automation, may not provide the same level of pre-built automated workflows, potentially requiring more manual intervention for certain security processes.
Customer Support: Secureframe is praised for its responsive customer support team that assists users with any questions or issues they encounter while using the platform. On the contrary, Wazuh's customer support may not be as robust or readily available, which could impact user satisfaction and troubleshooting.
Scalability and Customization: Secureframe is designed to scale with businesses of various sizes, offering customization options to tailor the platform to specific organizational needs. Wazuh, while scalable, may not provide the same level of flexibility for customization to fit unique security requirements of different organizations.

In Summary, Secureframe offers extensive integrations, compliance management, user-friendly UI/UX, automated workflows, robust customer support, and scalability with customization options, setting it apart from Wazuh in these key aspects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Wazuh	Secureframe
It is a free, open source and enterprise-ready security monitoring solution for threat detection, integrity monitoring, incident response and compliance.	It helps companies get enterprise ready by streamlining SOC 2 and ISO 27001 compliance. It allows companies to get compliant within weeks, rather than months and monitors 25+ services, including AWS, GCP, and Azure.
Security Analytics; Intrusion Detection; Log Data Analysis; File Integrity Monitoring; Vulnerability Detection; Configuration Assessment; Incident Response; Regulatory Compliance	Get SOC 2 ready in weeks, not months; Secure an audit through our preferred auditor network; Stay compliant through automated reports and alerts; Scale safely with custom workflows and automation
Statistics
GitHub Stars 13.8K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 2.0K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 143	Stacks 3
Followers 336	Followers 10
Votes 4	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 2 Open-source 2 Well documented	No community feedback yet
Integrations
CloudFlare WordPress Linux macOS Windows Splunk	Heroku Bitbucket CloudFlare GitHub GitLab Slack G Suite Google Cloud Platform Azure Active Directory Microsoft 365

What are some alternatives to Wazuh, Secureframe?

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Virgil Security

Virgil consists of an open-source encryption library, which implements CMS and ECIES(including RSA schema), a Key Management API, and a cloud-based Key Management Service.

Clef

Clef is secure two-factor — built for consumers. Easy to use, integrate, and pay for.

ExpeditedSSL

Stop pouring through MAN pages and outdated blog posts that don't take into account new requirements. With our add-on, you can go from install to confirmed installation in as little as twenty minutes: using nothing but your browser.

Detectify

Detectify is a web security service that simulates automated hacker attacks on your website, detecting critical security issues before real hackers do. We provide you with descriptive reports of the results so that you can continue to build safe products

SSLMate

SSLMate is the easiest way for developers and sysadmins to buy SSL certificates.

Authy

We make the best rated Two-Factor Authentication smartphone app for consumers, a Rest API for developers and a strong authentication platform for the enterprise.

Related Comparisons

Secureframe vs Wazuh: What are the differences?

Integration with other tools: Secureframe offers integrations with various tools like Slack, JIRA, and GitHub, providing a seamless workflow for security operations. On the other hand, Wazuh focuses more on its own centralized monitoring and security capabilities without as extensive integrations with third-party tools.
Compliance Management: Secureframe specifically focuses on helping companies achieve and maintain compliance with various frameworks like SOC 2, HIPAA, and ISO 27001 by providing tailored workflows and documentation. In contrast, Wazuh does not place the same emphasis on compliance management and documentation for specific regulatory standards.
User Interface and User Experience (UI/UX): Secureframe boasts a user-friendly and intuitive UI/UX design aimed at simplifying the security management process for users. Wazuh, while functional, may not offer the same level of user-friendly interface and experience, potentially requiring more training or familiarity for users to navigate effectively.
Automated Workflows: Secureframe streamlines security operations by offering automated workflows for tasks such as security incident response, vulnerability management, and audit preparation. Wazuh, while capable of automation, may not provide the same level of pre-built automated workflows, potentially requiring more manual intervention for certain security processes.
Customer Support: Secureframe is praised for its responsive customer support team that assists users with any questions or issues they encounter while using the platform. On the contrary, Wazuh's customer support may not be as robust or readily available, which could impact user satisfaction and troubleshooting.
Scalability and Customization: Secureframe is designed to scale with businesses of various sizes, offering customization options to tailor the platform to specific organizational needs. Wazuh, while scalable, may not provide the same level of flexibility for customization to fit unique security requirements of different organizations.

Secureframe vs Wazuh

Overview