StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. Selenide vs Spock Framework

Selenide vs Spock Framework

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Spock Framework
Spock Framework
Stacks694
Followers84
Votes23
GitHub Stars3.6K
Forks475
Selenide
Selenide
Stacks56
Followers85
Votes16
GitHub Stars0
Forks0

Selenide vs Spock Framework: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>
  1. Browser Automation Library: Selenide is a powerful browser automation library that simplifies the interaction with web elements, offering more concise and readable syntax compared to traditional Selenium. On the other hand, Spock Framework is a testing and specification framework that simplifies the creation of automated tests using Groovy language, enabling the creation of expressive and maintainable tests.

  2. Test Structure: In Selenide, test cases are typically structured using a page object design pattern, where web elements and actions are encapsulated within separate classes for better organization and reusability. Conversely, Spock Framework follows a more behavior-driven development approach, allowing tests to be written in a natural language style that closely reflects the expected behaviors of the application.

  3. Assertions: When it comes to assertions, Selenide provides a set of built-in assertions that make it easy to verify the state of web elements and perform validation within test cases. In contrast, Spock Framework leverages the power of Groovy's assert keyword to perform assertions, offering flexibility in defining custom validation logic as needed.

  4. Reporting and Integration: Selenide offers built-in support for generating HTML reports that provide detailed information about test execution and results, making it easier to identify failures and analyze test outcomes. On the other hand, Spock Framework can be integrated with various reporting plugins and tools, giving users the flexibility to choose the most suitable reporting solution for their specific needs.

  5. Mocking and Stubs: While both Selenide and Spock Framework support the use of mocking and stubbing frameworks for simulating external dependencies and controlling test behavior, Spock's integration with tools like Mockito and Groovy's built-in stubbing capabilities offer more comprehensive options for advanced test scenarios.

  6. Community and Support: Selenide has a strong community of users and contributors who actively maintain the library, provide support, and regularly release updates to address issues and enhance functionality. Similarly, the Spock Framework is backed by a dedicated community that offers assistance, shares best practices, and continuously improves the framework to cater to the evolving needs of automated testing.

In Summary, Selenide and Spock Framework differ in their approach to browser automation, test structure, assertions, reporting, mocking capabilities, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Spock Framework, Selenide

Esther
Esther

Feb 16, 2020

Needs adviceonreact-testing-libraryreact-testing-library

Hi, I am starting out to test an application that is currently being developed - FE: React. BE: Node JS. I want the framework to be able to test all UI scenarios (from simple to complex) and also have the capability to test APIs. I also need to run tests across all OSs and Browsers (Windows, Mac, Android, iOS). I have also looked into react-testing-library and @TestProject.io. Any advice you can give as to which framework would be best and why would be so much appreciated! Thank you!!

96.5k views96.5k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Spock Framework
Spock Framework
Selenide
Selenide

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

-
Concise fluent API for tests; Ajax support for stable tests; Powerful selectors; Simple configuration
Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.6K
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Forks
475
GitHub Forks
0
Stacks
694
Stacks
56
Followers
84
Followers
85
Votes
23
Votes
16
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 7
    Ease of use via the Given/When/Then approach
  • 5
    Verbose output for test failures
  • 5
    Built-in mocking library
  • 5
    Easily write one test with multiple cases
  • 1
    Parametrisation
Pros
  • 5
    Nice JAVA API
  • 2
    Integrated with Selenium-Jupiter framework
  • 2
    Integrated with WebDriverManager project
  • 2
    Very mature API
  • 2
    File upload support
Cons
  • 1
    Hybrid page model not possible
Integrations
No integrations available
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Android Studio
Android Studio
Selendroid
Selendroid
Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs

What are some alternatives to Spock Framework, Selenide?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana