StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. Selenide vs TestNG

Selenide vs TestNG

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Selenide
Selenide
Stacks56
Followers85
Votes16
GitHub Stars0
Forks0
TestNG
TestNG
Stacks1.2K
Followers198
Votes0

Selenide vs TestNG: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Selenide and TestNG

Selenide and TestNG are two popular tools used in software testing, but they have distinct differences in their functionalities and features.

  1. Test Framework vs. Browser Automation Library: Selenide is primarily a browser automation library built on top of Selenium WebDriver, providing a more user-friendly and concise API for writing browser automation tests. On the other hand, TestNG is a full-fledged test framework that supports various test types, including unit, functional, and end-to-end tests, offering advanced test management and reporting capabilities.

  2. Configuration and Dependency Handling: Selenide focuses on simplicity and minimizing the need for configuration. It provides sensible default configurations and automatically manages dependencies such as browser drivers. In contrast, TestNG allows more flexibility in configuring various aspects of test execution, such as test parallelization, test dependencies, and custom listeners.

  3. Test Organization and Execution: Selenide encourages a more structured test organization by providing out-of-the-box support for Page Object Model (POM) pattern and Fluent Interface design. It also simplifies test execution by handling dynamic waits and synchronizations implicitly. TestNG, on the other hand, provides a comprehensive test organization framework with annotations, allowing users to create test suites, set up pre and post test conditions, and define test priorities and groups.

  4. Assertions and Verifications: Selenide enhances the assertion capabilities of Selenium WebDriver by providing a set of highly expressive and concise methods for element checks and page validations. It also automatically retries assertions for a configurable period, reducing the flakiness of browser tests. TestNG offers a range of assertion methods as part of its assertion API, enabling users to perform complex verifications and define custom assertion failure messages.

  5. Test Reporting and Logging: Selenide provides built-in reporting capabilities that generate clear and concise HTML reports with screenshots, detailed error messages, and failed browser console logs. It also outputs rich logging information during test execution. TestNG, being a comprehensive test framework, offers customizable report generation with detailed test execution results, including configuration parameters, test durations, and test failures, which can be integrated with various tools such as Jenkins.

  6. Test Data Management: Selenide does not specifically provide features for managing test data. Users need to handle test data independently, either by creating test data in test fixtures or by utilizing external test data providers. In contrast, TestNG includes features for parameterizing tests and supports various data providers, enabling users to supply test data from different sources (e.g., XML, CSV, databases) for data-driven testing scenarios.

In summary, Selenide is predominantly focused on simplifying browser automation and enhancing the Selenium WebDriver API, while TestNG provides a broader set of features for comprehensive test organization, execution, and reporting, including support for multiple types of tests and advanced test data management capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Selenide, TestNG

Esther
Esther

Feb 16, 2020

Needs adviceonreact-testing-libraryreact-testing-library

Hi, I am starting out to test an application that is currently being developed - FE: React. BE: Node JS. I want the framework to be able to test all UI scenarios (from simple to complex) and also have the capability to test APIs. I also need to run tests across all OSs and Browsers (Windows, Mac, Android, iOS). I have also looked into react-testing-library and @TestProject.io. Any advice you can give as to which framework would be best and why would be so much appreciated! Thank you!!

96.5k views96.5k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Selenide
Selenide
TestNG
TestNG

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

It is a testing framework designed to simplify a broad range of testing needs, it covers all categories of tests: unit, functional, end-to-end, integration, etc.Run your tests in arbitrarily big thread pools with various policies available (all methods in their own thread, one thread per test class, etc.

Concise fluent API for tests; Ajax support for stable tests; Powerful selectors; Simple configuration
Support for data-driven testing ; Support for parameters; Powerful execution model (no more TestSuite); Supported by a variety of tools and plug-ins (Eclipse, IDEA, Maven, etc
Statistics
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
56
Stacks
1.2K
Followers
85
Followers
198
Votes
16
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Nice JAVA API
  • 2
    Integrated with WebDriverManager project
  • 2
    Very mature API
  • 2
    File upload support
  • 2
    Integrated with Selenium-Jupiter framework
Cons
  • 1
    Hybrid page model not possible
No community feedback yet
Integrations
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Android Studio
Android Studio
Selendroid
Selendroid
Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
Eclipse
Eclipse
Apache Maven
Apache Maven

What are some alternatives to Selenide, TestNG?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana