StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Realtime Backend API
  5. SignalR vs XMPP

SignalR vs XMPP

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SignalR
SignalR
Stacks656
Followers1.2K
Votes146
GitHub Stars9.3K
Forks2.3K
XMPP
XMPP
Stacks71
Followers138
Votes0

SignalR vs XMPP: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between SignalR and XMPP in terms of their functionality and use cases.

  1. Architecture: SignalR is a real-time communication library for .NET, which allows bi-directional communication between the server and the clients. It uses websockets as the default transport mechanism but supports fallback options like Server-Sent Events (SSE) and long polling. On the other hand, XMPP (Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol) is an open standard protocol for real-time communication similar to email. It follows a client-server architecture, where the server acts as a message broker and the clients establish direct connections with the server.

  2. Collaboration vs. Messaging: SignalR is primarily designed for real-time collaboration scenarios, where multiple clients can interact with each other in real-time, like in chat applications or collaborative document editing. It provides features like message broadcasting and group management. On the contrary, XMPP is more focused on messaging scenarios, where clients exchange messages with each other through the server. It supports features like presence notifications, delivery confirmation, and message archiving.

  3. Technology Stack: SignalR is a part of the Microsoft .NET ecosystem and can be used with ASP.NET and ASP.NET Core web applications. It integrates seamlessly with other .NET libraries and frameworks. On the other hand, XMPP is a protocol that can be implemented using various programming languages and technologies. It is not limited to a specific platform or framework.

  4. Extensibility and Customization: SignalR provides hooks and APIs to extend and customize its functionality. Developers can implement their own logic for message routing, authentication, and authorization. XMPP, being a protocol, is also highly extensible. Developers can define their own custom XML-based extensions called XEPs (XMPP Extension Protocols) to add new features or modify the behavior of the protocol.

  5. Authentication and Security: SignalR provides built-in authentication and authorization mechanisms, which can be easily integrated with existing ASP.NET security infrastructure. It supports various authentication providers like ASP.NET Identity, OAuth, and custom authentication schemes. XMPP also supports authentication and security features like SASL (Simple Authentication and Security Layer) and TLS (Transport Layer Security) encryption. It provides mechanisms for user authentication and secure communication between the server and the clients.

  6. Ecosystem and Adoption: SignalR has a strong ecosystem with extensive community support, documentation, and third-party libraries. It is widely adopted in the .NET development community and is backed by Microsoft. XMPP, being an open standard protocol, has a larger ecosystem with implementations in various programming languages and platforms. It has been adopted by many messaging and collaboration applications and is used by major companies like Google for their messaging platforms.

In summary, SignalR is a real-time communication library for .NET, designed for collaboration scenarios with strong integration with the Microsoft ecosystem. XMPP is an open standard protocol for messaging and presence, which is widely adopted and implemented in various programming languages and platforms.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

SignalR
SignalR
XMPP
XMPP

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

It is a set of open technologies for instant messaging, presence, multi-party chat, voice and video calls, collaboration, lightweight middleware, content syndication, and generalized routing of XML data.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
9.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.3K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
656
Stacks
71
Followers
1.2K
Followers
138
Votes
146
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 32
    Supports .NET server
  • 25
    Real-time
  • 18
    Free
  • 16
    Fallback to SSE, forever frame, long polling
  • 15
    WebSockets
Cons
  • 2
    Requires jQuery
  • 2
    Expertise hard to get
  • 1
    Big differences between ASP.NET and Core versions
  • 1
    Weak iOS and Android support
No community feedback yet
Integrations
.NET
.NET
Java
Java
Python
Python
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to SignalR, XMPP?

Firebase

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Socket.IO

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

PubNub

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase