StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Version Control
  4. Source Code Management Desktop Apps
  5. SmartGit vs Tower

SmartGit vs Tower

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Tower
Tower
Stacks214
Followers360
Votes80
SmartGit
SmartGit
Stacks40
Followers49
Votes2

SmartGit vs Tower: What are the differences?

Introduction:

SmartGit and Tower are both popular Git clients used for version control and collaboration in software development. While they serve a similar purpose, there are key differences that set them apart.

  1. Integration with GitLab and Bitbucket: SmartGit offers seamless integration with both GitLab and Bitbucket, allowing users to easily connect to and work with repositories hosted on these platforms. Tower, on the other hand, does not provide native integration with these platforms and requires additional setup and configuration to work with them.

  2. User Interface: SmartGit has a more complex and feature-rich user interface compared to Tower. It offers a range of advanced features, such as repository managers, powerful branch and tag operations, and conflict resolution tools, which can be beneficial for experienced developers. Tower, on the other hand, has a simpler and more streamlined user interface, making it easier for beginners to get started with Git.

  3. Price: Tower is a paid Git client, with different pricing plans based on the number of users and type of license. It offers a free trial period, but after that, users need to purchase a license to continue using the software. SmartGit, on the other hand, offers both free and paid versions. The free version has functional limitations and is suitable for basic Git usage, while the paid version provides access to all the advanced features.

  4. Platform Support: SmartGit is a cross-platform Git client that is compatible with Windows, macOS, and Linux operating systems. Tower, on the other hand, is primarily built for macOS and has limited support for Windows.

  5. Customizability: Tower provides a high level of customizability, allowing users to configure and personalize various aspects of the Git client according to their preferences. SmartGit, on the other hand, has limited customization options and does not offer the same level of flexibility in terms of appearance and functionality.

  6. Integration with other Tools: SmartGit has built-in integration with popular development tools like IntelliJ IDEA, Visual Studio Code, and Eclipse. This allows users to seamlessly switch between the Git client and their preferred development environment. Tower, on the other hand, does not provide direct integration with these tools and requires users to manually switch between the Git client and their development environment.

In summary, SmartGit provides integration with GitLab and Bitbucket, has a feature-rich user interface, offers both free and paid versions, supports multiple platforms, has limited customization options, and integrates with popular development tools. Tower, on the other hand, lacks native integration with GitLab and Bitbucket, has a simpler user interface, is a paid Git client primarily built for macOS, provides high customizability, and lacks direct integration with popular development tools.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Tower
Tower
SmartGit
SmartGit

Use all of Git's powerful feature set - in a GUI that makes you more productive.

SmartGit is a powerful Git GUI client with support for GitHub, Bitbucket, GitLab and Azure DevOps. SmartGit runs on Windows, macOS and Linux.

Clone & create repos with a click - Manage your GitHub, Bitbucket & Beanstalk accounts from within Tower;Open repos quickly - Tower's "Quick Open" dialog finds and opens repositories in no time;Automate the boring stuff - Fetching and stashing are automatically done for you, if you wish;Clone in the background- Downloading large projects happens in the background, while you work;Multiple windows - Have multiple projects open side-by-side
-
Statistics
Stacks
214
Stacks
40
Followers
360
Followers
49
Votes
80
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 19
    Git
  • 16
    Just works
  • 10
    Version control
  • 6
    Awesome
  • 6
    Simple layout
Cons
  • 5
    Expensive
  • 4
    Subscription based
  • 1
    No side by side diff
  • 0
    Merge conflict resolution impossible/unclear
Pros
  • 2
    Dark theme
Cons
  • 1
    Non-intuitive actions
  • 1
    Bugs
Integrations
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
TextMate
TextMate
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
GitHub
GitHub
GitLab
GitLab
Git
Git
Xcode
Xcode
Gerrit Code Review
Gerrit Code Review
Beanstalk
Beanstalk
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Tower, SmartGit?

SourceTree

SourceTree

Use the full capability of Git and Mercurial in the SourceTree desktop app. Manage all your repositories, hosted or local, through SourceTree's simple interface.

GitKraken

GitKraken

The downright luxurious Git client for Windows, Mac and Linux. Cross-platform, 100% standalone, and free.

Fork

Fork

Manage your repositories without leaving the application. Organize the repositores into categories. Fork's Diff Viewer provides a clear view to spot the changes in your source code quickly.

Sublime Merge

Sublime Merge

A snappy UI, three-way merge tool, side-by-side diffs, syntax highlighting, and more. Evaluate for free – no account, tracking, or time limits.

GitUp

GitUp

GitUp lets you see your entire labyrinth of branches and merges with perfect clarity. Any change you make, large or small, even outside GitUp, is immediately reflected in GitUp's graph. No refreshing, no waiting.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana