StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. API Tools
  5. Soap UI vs Stargate

Soap UI vs Stargate

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Soap UI
Soap UI
Stacks241
Followers157
Votes3
Stargate
Stargate
Stacks8
Followers11
Votes0
GitHub Stars843
Forks171

Soap UI vs Stargate: What are the differences?

  1. API Protocol - One key difference between Soap UI and Stargate is the API protocol they support. Soap UI primarily focuses on testing SOAP (Simple Object Access Protocol) web services, while Stargate is designed for testing RESTful APIs, making it more suitable for modern API testing scenarios.
  2. Ease of Use - Stargate offers a more user-friendly and intuitive interface compared to Soap UI, making it easier for both beginners and experienced users to navigate and perform various API testing tasks efficiently.
  3. Scalability - Stargate offers better scalability options, allowing testers to handle a larger volume of API requests and responses effectively compared to Soap UI, making it a more suitable choice for enterprise-level API testing.
  4. Integration Capabilities - Stargate provides seamless integration with various popular tools and frameworks used in the API testing ecosystem, offering better compatibility and flexibility compared to Soap UI, ensuring a more streamlined and efficient testing process.
  5. Performance Testing - Stargate offers built-in features for performance testing of APIs, allowing testers to simulate high loads and analyze API performance metrics, which is not as robust in Soap UI, making Stargate a better choice for performance testing scenarios.
  6. Real-Time Collaboration - Stargate provides collaborative features that enable multiple team members to work on API testing projects simultaneously, facilitating real-time collaboration and improving overall team productivity, a capability that is lacking in Soap UI.

In Summary, Stargate and Soap UI differ in API protocol support, ease of use, scalability, integration capabilities, performance testing features, and real-time collaboration functionality.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Soap UI
Soap UI
Stargate
Stargate

It is an open source functional Testing tool for API Testing. It supports multiple protocols such as SOAP, REST, HTTP, JMS, AMF and JDBC. It supports functional tests, security tests, and virtualization.

It is a data gateway deployed between client applications and a database. It's built with extensibility as a first-class citizen and makes it easy to use a database for any application workload by adding plugin support for new APIs, data types, and access methods.

-
API Services; Persistence Services; Authentication Services
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
843
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
171
Stacks
241
Stacks
8
Followers
157
Followers
11
Votes
3
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Open source
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Snowflake
Snowflake
Kafka
Kafka
Apache Spark
Apache Spark
Hadoop
Hadoop
Jupyter
Jupyter

What are some alternatives to Soap UI, Stargate?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Hoppscotch

Hoppscotch

It is a free, fast and beautiful API request builder. It helps you create requests faster, saving precious time on development

Falcor

Falcor

Falcor lets you represent all your remote data sources as a single domain model via a virtual JSON graph. You code the same way no matter where the data is, whether in memory on the client or over the network on the server.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope