StackHawk vs Tenable.sc

Overview

Tenable.sc

Stacks21

Followers33

Votes0

StackHawk

Stacks11

Followers20

Votes1

StackHawk vs Tenable.sc: What are the differences?

Pricing Model: StackHawk follows a straightforward pricing model based on usage, offering transparent pricing with no hidden fees, whereas Tenable.sc uses a more complex pricing structure that includes factors like node counts and features, making it harder to estimate the total cost.
Scanning Flexibility: StackHawk allows for continuous application security testing at every stage of the development cycle, integrating seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines, while Tenable.sc primarily focuses on vulnerability management and compliance scanning, with less emphasis on continuous testing.
Ease of Use: StackHawk is known for its user-friendly interface and intuitive workflows, making it easier for developers and security teams to navigate and use effectively, whereas Tenable.sc has a steeper learning curve and may require more training to master its features.
Integration Capabilities: StackHawk provides robust integration capabilities with popular development tools and platforms, enabling smooth integration into existing workflows, while Tenable.sc may have limited integration options and may not be as flexible in adapting to different environments.
Reporting and Analysis: StackHawk offers detailed and customizable reports with actionable insights into vulnerabilities and risks, facilitating better decision-making and remediation efforts, whereas Tenable.sc's reporting and analysis capabilities may be more static and less customizable.
Focus on Developer Empowerment: StackHawk places a strong emphasis on empowering developers to take ownership of application security by providing them with tools and resources to detect and remediate vulnerabilities early in the development process, while Tenable.sc is more geared towards security professionals and may not offer the same level of developer empowerment.

In Summary, StackHawk offers a more user-friendly, developer-focused, and flexible approach to application security testing compared to Tenable.sc.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Tenable.sc	StackHawk
It is a comprehensive vulnerability analysis solution that provides complete visibility into the security posture of your distributed and complex IT infrastructure.	An application security tool built for developers. Automated security bug scanning for the entire dev pipeline. Find, Triage, and Fix.
Managed On-Prem; Real-time, continuous assessment of your security; Discovers unknown assets and vulnerabilities	Scan your running app for security bugs with a single Docker command; Prioritize high risk findings, manage backlog of low risk items, and silence noise of known and accepted risk; Manage configuration in code, allowing for collaboration, scalability, and version control; See when bugs were introduced across environments, review comments on actions taken, and log resolutions
Statistics
Stacks 21	Stacks 11
Followers 33	Followers 20
Votes 0	Votes 1
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 1 CI/CD pipeline integration
Integrations
No integrations available	Jenkins GitLab Travis CI GitHub Slack AWS CodePipeline CircleCI Concourse

What are some alternatives to Tenable.sc, StackHawk?

Sentry

Sentry’s Application Monitoring platform helps developers see performance issues, fix errors faster, and optimize their code health.

Rollbar

Rollbar is the leading continuous code improvement platform that proactively discovers, predicts, and remediates errors with real-time AI-assisted workflows. With Rollbar, developers continually improve their code and constantly innovate ra

Bugsnag

Bugsnag captures errors from your web, mobile and back-end applications, providing instant visibility into user impact. Diagnostic data and tools are included to help your team prioritize, debug and fix exceptions fast.

Raygun

Raygun gives you a window into how users are really experiencing your software applications. Detect, diagnose and resolve issues that are affecting end users with greater speed and accuracy.

Opbeat

Opbeat is application monitoring for developers, and gives you performance metrics, error logging, release tracking and workflow in one smart product.

Airbrake

Airbrake collects errors for your applications in all major languages and frameworks. We alert you to new errors and give you critical context, trends and details needed to find and fix errors fast.

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Honeybadger

Honeybadger does more than report errors, it helps you work with your team to fix them. Errors can be assigned. You can comment via email. And a fine-grained permissions system means you control who has access to each specific project.

Errbit

Errbit is a tool for collecting and managing errors from other applications. It is Airbrake (formerly known as Hoptoad) API compliant, so if you are already using Airbrake, you can just point the airbrake gem to your Errbit server.

Related Comparisons

StackHawk vs Tenable.sc: What are the differences?

Pricing Model: StackHawk follows a straightforward pricing model based on usage, offering transparent pricing with no hidden fees, whereas Tenable.sc uses a more complex pricing structure that includes factors like node counts and features, making it harder to estimate the total cost.
Scanning Flexibility: StackHawk allows for continuous application security testing at every stage of the development cycle, integrating seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines, while Tenable.sc primarily focuses on vulnerability management and compliance scanning, with less emphasis on continuous testing.
Ease of Use: StackHawk is known for its user-friendly interface and intuitive workflows, making it easier for developers and security teams to navigate and use effectively, whereas Tenable.sc has a steeper learning curve and may require more training to master its features.
Integration Capabilities: StackHawk provides robust integration capabilities with popular development tools and platforms, enabling smooth integration into existing workflows, while Tenable.sc may have limited integration options and may not be as flexible in adapting to different environments.
Reporting and Analysis: StackHawk offers detailed and customizable reports with actionable insights into vulnerabilities and risks, facilitating better decision-making and remediation efforts, whereas Tenable.sc's reporting and analysis capabilities may be more static and less customizable.
Focus on Developer Empowerment: StackHawk places a strong emphasis on empowering developers to take ownership of application security by providing them with tools and resources to detect and remediate vulnerabilities early in the development process, while Tenable.sc is more geared towards security professionals and may not offer the same level of developer empowerment.

In Summary, StackHawk offers a more user-friendly, developer-focused, and flexible approach to application security testing compared to Tenable.sc.

StackHawk vs Tenable.sc

Overview