StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. TeamCity vs Upsource

TeamCity vs Upsource

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

TeamCity
TeamCity
Stacks1.2K
Followers1.1K
Votes316
Upsource
Upsource
Stacks51
Followers77
Votes58

TeamCity vs Upsource: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This Markdown code outlines the key differences between TeamCity and Upsource.

1. **Integration with CI/CD pipelines**: TeamCity is primarily a Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) tool, while Upsource is a code review and collaboration tool integrated with version control systems. 
2. **Feature focus**: TeamCity focuses on automating the build process, running tests, and deploying applications, while Upsource focuses on code review, searching codebases, and providing insights into code quality.
3. **User roles**: TeamCity is typically used by developers, QA engineers, and DevOps teams for build automation, while Upsource is mainly used by developers for code reviews, collaboration, and knowledge sharing.
4. **Support for multiple version control systems**: TeamCity supports various version control systems such as Git, Mercurial, Subversion, and Perforce, while Upsource provides advanced integration with Git and Mercurial repositories.
5. **Code analysis and insights**: Upsource offers advanced code analysis features like code intelligence, code search, and code-related discussions, while TeamCity focuses more on the build and deployment process without extensive code analysis tools.
6. **Deployment monitoring and management**: TeamCity provides detailed insights into the deployment process through build logs, artifacts, and notifications, whereas Upsource does not include deployment monitoring capabilities.

In Summary, TeamCity and Upsource differ in their core functionalities, user focus, code analysis capabilities, and integration with CI/CD pipelines.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

TeamCity
TeamCity
Upsource
Upsource

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Automate code analyzing, compiling, and testing processes, with having instant feedback on build progress, problems, and test failures, all in a simple, intuitive web-interface; Simplified setup: create projects from just a VCS repository URL;Run multiple builds and tests under different configurations and platforms simultaneously; Make sure your team sustains an uninterrupted workflow with the help of Pretested commits and Personal builds; Have build history insight with customizable statistics on build duration, success rate, code quality, and custom metrics; Enable cost-effective on-demand build infrastructure scaling thanks to tight integration with Amazon EC2; Easily extend TeamCity functionality and add new integrations using Java API; Great visual project representation. Track any changes made by any user in the system, filter projects and choose style of visual change status representation;
Instantly access all your projects;Keep track of code changes;Use code insight in Java projects;Explore any revision of your code base;Discuss and review code;Share links to code
Statistics
Stacks
1.2K
Stacks
51
Followers
1.1K
Followers
77
Votes
316
Votes
58
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 61
    Easy to configure
  • 37
    Reliable and high-quality
  • 32
    On premise
  • 32
    User friendly
  • 32
    Github integration
Cons
  • 3
    High costs for more than three build agents
  • 2
    User friendly
  • 2
    Proprietary
  • 2
    User-friendly
Pros
  • 15
    Free for 10 users
  • 12
    Good code review
  • 8
    IDE integration
  • 8
    Java code inspections and navigation
  • 3
    Simple to use
Cons
  • 3
    Very Large Server Footprint. Very large
Integrations
Slack
Slack
GitHub
GitHub
Git
Git
Mercurial
Mercurial
SVN (Subversion)
SVN (Subversion)
Perforce
Perforce

What are some alternatives to TeamCity, Upsource?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana