StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. TeamCity vs Visual Studio App Center

TeamCity vs Visual Studio App Center

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

TeamCity
TeamCity
Stacks1.2K
Followers1.1K
Votes316
Visual Studio App Center
Visual Studio App Center
Stacks113
Followers232
Votes4

TeamCity vs Visual Studio App Center: What are the differences?

Comparison of TeamCity and Visual Studio App Center

TeamCity and Visual Studio App Center are both popular tools for continuous integration and delivery in the software development lifecycle. While they serve similar purposes, there are key differences between the two that make them suitable for different scenarios. This article highlights the main differences between TeamCity and Visual Studio App Center.

1. Integration and Compatibility:

TeamCity is a build management and continuous integration tool that can be used across multiple programming languages and platforms. It has extensive integration capabilities with various IDEs, version control systems, and third-party tools. On the other hand, Visual Studio App Center is primarily focused on mobile app development and has strong integration with the Microsoft ecosystem, particularly with Visual Studio, Azure, and Xamarin. It provides specialized features and support for building, testing, and distributing mobile apps.

2. Scalability and Performance:

TeamCity is known for its scalability and ability to handle large-scale projects with a high number of build configurations, agents, and distributed build environments. It can efficiently manage complex build pipelines and provide parallel build execution. Visual Studio App Center, while suitable for smaller to medium-sized projects, may have limitations in terms of scalability and performance, especially for large enterprise-level projects requiring extensive parallelism and distributed build setups.

3. Build Automation and Customization:

TeamCity offers extensive build automation and configuration options, allowing users to define build steps, triggers, and dependencies within their build pipelines. It supports various customization options through its build script, which enables fine-grained control over the build process. Visual Studio App Center also provides build automation capabilities, but it may have limitations in terms of customization options compared to TeamCity.

4. Testing and Analytics:

While both TeamCity and Visual Studio App Center offer testing capabilities, their focus differs. TeamCity primarily focuses on continuous integration and build testing, providing integrations with various unit testing frameworks and static code analysis tools. Visual Studio App Center, on the other hand, provides more comprehensive mobile app testing capabilities, including automated UI testing, device and emulator testing, crash reporting, and analytics.

5. Deployment and Distribution:

TeamCity enables users to deploy builds to various environments or artifact repositories and provides integration with common deployment tools, such as Octopus Deploy and AWS CodeDeploy. Visual Studio App Center, specifically designed for mobile app development, offers features for streamlined app distribution, beta testing, and release management, including support for app stores and app versioning.

6. Team Collaboration and Project Management:

TeamCity provides features for team collaboration and project management, such as user roles and permissions, project-level customization, and integration with issue tracking systems like Jira. Visual Studio App Center, being a part of the Visual Studio ecosystem, offers enhanced collaboration features for teams developing mobile apps, including collaboration on code, version control integration, and integration with popular project management tools like Azure Boards.

In summary, TeamCity excels in its versatility, scalability, and customization options, serving as a comprehensive continuous integration and delivery tool for various software development environments. Visual Studio App Center, on the other hand, specializes in mobile app development, providing extensive capabilities for testing, deployment, and collaboration within the Microsoft ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

TeamCity
TeamCity
Visual Studio App Center
Visual Studio App Center

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Automate the lifecycle of your iOS, Android, Windows, and macOS apps. Connect your repo and within minutes build in the cloud, test on thousands of real devices, distribute to beta testers and app stores, and monitor real-world usage with crash and analytics data. All in one place.

Automate code analyzing, compiling, and testing processes, with having instant feedback on build progress, problems, and test failures, all in a simple, intuitive web-interface; Simplified setup: create projects from just a VCS repository URL;Run multiple builds and tests under different configurations and platforms simultaneously; Make sure your team sustains an uninterrupted workflow with the help of Pretested commits and Personal builds; Have build history insight with customizable statistics on build duration, success rate, code quality, and custom metrics; Enable cost-effective on-demand build infrastructure scaling thanks to tight integration with Amazon EC2; Easily extend TeamCity functionality and add new integrations using Java API; Great visual project representation. Track any changes made by any user in the system, filter projects and choose style of visual change status representation;
Build; Test; Distribute; Crashes; Diagnostics; Analytics; Push; CD/CI;
Statistics
Stacks
1.2K
Stacks
113
Followers
1.1K
Followers
232
Votes
316
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 61
    Easy to configure
  • 37
    Reliable and high-quality
  • 32
    On premise
  • 32
    User friendly
  • 32
    Github integration
Cons
  • 3
    High costs for more than three build agents
  • 2
    User-friendly
  • 2
    User friendly
  • 2
    Proprietary
Pros
  • 1
    Bug tracking integration
  • 1
    Show error issues for mobile devices
  • 1
    Slack integration
  • 1
    For Mobile apps diagnostics and tracking
Integrations
Slack
Slack
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps
Slack
Slack

What are some alternatives to TeamCity, Visual Studio App Center?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Ionic

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

Flutter

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Xamarin

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

NativeScript

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot