Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Telegraf

192
215
+ 1
15
Zabbix

523
738
+ 1
57
Add tool

Telegraf vs Zabbix: What are the differences?

Telegraf: The plugin-driven server agent for collecting & reporting metrics. It is an agent for collecting, processing, aggregating, and writing metrics. Design goals are to have a minimal memory footprint with a plugin system so that developers in the community can easily add support for collecting metrics; Zabbix: Track, record, alert and visualize performance and availability of IT resources. Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.

Telegraf and Zabbix belong to "Monitoring Tools" category of the tech stack.

Telegraf and Zabbix are both open source tools. It seems that Telegraf with 7.01K GitHub stars and 2.65K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Zabbix with 514 GitHub stars and 187 GitHub forks.

According to the StackShare community, Zabbix has a broader approval, being mentioned in 46 company stacks & 25 developers stacks; compared to Telegraf, which is listed in 13 company stacks and 3 developer stacks.

Advice on Telegraf and Zabbix
Needs advice
on
Zabbix
and
Centreon

My team is divided on using Centreon or Zabbix for enterprise monitoring and alert automation. Can someone let us know which one is better? There is one more tool called Datadog that we are using for cloud assets. Of course, Datadog presents us with huge bills. So we want to have a comparative study. Suggestions and advice are welcome. Thanks!

See more
Replies (4)
Geoffrey Timmerman
Systems Engineer at Simac · | 6 upvotes · 192.6K views
Recommends
Zabbix
at

I work at Volvo Car Corporation as a consultant Project Manager. We have deployed Zabbix in all of our factories for factory monitoring because after thorough investigation we saw that Zabbix supports the wide variety of Operating Systems, hardware peripherals and devices a Car Manufacturer has.

No other tool had the same amount of support onboard for our production environment and we didn't want to end up using a different tool again for several areas. That is the major strong point about Zabbix and it's free of course. Another strong point is the documentation which is widely available; Zabbix Youtube channel with tutorial video's, Zabbix share which holds free templates, the Zabbix online documentation and the Zabbix forum also helped us out quite a bit. Deployment is quite easy since it uses templates, so almost all configuration can be done on server side.

To conclude, we are really pleased with the tool so far, it helped us detect several causes of issues that were a pain to solve in the past.

See more
Recommends
Centreon

Centreon is part of the Nagios ecosystem, meaning there is a huge number of resources you may find around in the community (plugins, skills, addons). Zabbix monitoring paradigms are totally different from Centreon. Centreon plugins have some kind of intelligence when they are launched, where Zabbix monitoring rules are configured centrally with the raw data collected. Testing both will help you understand :) Users used to say Centreon may be faster for setup and deployment. And in the end, both are full of monitoring features. Centreon has out of the box a full catalog of probes from cloud to the edge https://www.centreon.com/en/plugins-pack-list/ As soon as you have defined your monitoring policies and template, you can deploy it fast through command line API or REST API. Centreon plays well in the ITSM, Automation, AIOps spaces with many connectors for Prometheus, ServiceNow, GLPI, Ansible, Chef, Splunk, ... The polling server mode is one of the differentiators with Centreon. You set up remote server(s) and chose btw multiple information-exchange mechanisms. Powerful and resilient for remote, VPN, DMZ, satellite networks. Centreon is a good value for price to do a data collection (availability, performance, fault) on a wide range of technologies (physical, legacy, cloud). There are pro support and enterprise version with dashboards and reporting. IT Central Station gathers many user feedback you can rely on both Centreon & Zabbix https://www.itcentralstation.com/products/centreon-reviews  

See more
muutech
at Muutech Monitoring Solutions, S.L. · | 3 upvotes · 191.7K views
Recommends
Zabbix

We highly recommend Zabbix. We have used it to build our own monitoring product (available on cloud -like datadog- or on premise with support) because of its flexibility and extendability. It can be easily integrated with the powerful dashboarding and data aggregation of Grafana, so it is perfect. All configuration is done via web and templates, so it scales well and can be distributed via proxies. I think there also more companies providing consultancy in Zabbix (like ours) than Centreon and community is much wider. Also Zabbix roadmap and focus (compatibility with Elasticsearch, Prometheus, TimescaleDB) is really really good.

See more
Recommends
Kamon
at

Hi Vivek, what's your stack? If huge monitoring bills are your concern and if you’re using a number of JVM languages, or mostly Scala / Akka, and would like “one tool to monitor them all”, Kamon might be the friendliest choice to go for.

Kamon APM’s major benefit is it comes with a built-in dashboard for the most important metrics to monitor, taking the pain of figuring out what to monitor and building your own dashboards for weeks out of the monitoring.

https://kamon.io/apm/

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using Private StackShare. Sign up for Private StackShare.
Learn More
Pros of Telegraf
Pros of Zabbix
  • 5
    Cohesioned stack for monitoring
  • 4
    One agent can work as multiple exporter with min hndlng
  • 2
    Open Source
  • 2
    Metrics
  • 1
    Supports custom plugins in any language
  • 1
    Many hundreds of plugins
  • 16
    Free
  • 7
    Alerts
  • 5
    Service/node/network discovery
  • 4
    Templates
  • 4
    Base metrics from the box
  • 3
    Multi-dashboards
  • 3
    SMS/Email/Messenger alerts
  • 2
    Supports Graphs ans screens
  • 2
    Support proxies (for monitoring remote branches)
  • 2
    Grafana plugin available
  • 1
    API available for creating own apps
  • 1
    Templates free available (Zabbix Share)
  • 1
    Works with multiple databases
  • 1
    Supports large variety of Operating Systems
  • 1
    Supports multiple protocols/agents
  • 1
    Complete Logs Report
  • 1
    Advanced integrations
  • 1
    Supports JMX (Java, Tomcat, Jboss, ...)
  • 1
    Perform website checking (response time, loading, ...)

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Telegraf
Cons of Zabbix
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 5
      The UI is in PHP
    • 2
      Puppet module is sluggish

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions