StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. TestComplete vs Testsigma

TestComplete vs Testsigma

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

TestComplete
TestComplete
Stacks39
Followers60
Votes0
Testsigma
Testsigma
Stacks8
Followers29
Votes0

TestComplete vs Testsigma: What are the differences?

  1. Automated Testing Approach: TestComplete focuses on keyword-driven testing, providing a flexible approach where tests are created using predefined keywords. On the other hand, Testsigma adopts a scriptless approach, offering a user-friendly interface where tests can be created without writing any code, using natural language and reusable components.

  2. Cloud-based Testing: Testsigma is a cloud-based automation testing tool, allowing teams to collaborate and execute tests remotely. In contrast, TestComplete primarily focuses on on-premise testing, requiring installations on local machines for test execution and management.

  3. Cross-browser Testing: TestComplete offers robust cross-browser testing capabilities, enabling testers to run tests on various browsers such as Chrome, Firefox, and Internet Explorer. Whereas Testsigma goes a step further by providing cloud-based cross-browser testing, allowing users to test their applications on a wide range of browsers and versions effortlessly.

  4. Integration with CI/CD Tools: Both TestComplete and Testsigma support integration with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins, Bamboo, and TeamCity. However, TestComplete integrates seamlessly with ALM tools like HP ALM and Microsoft Azure DevOps, while Testsigma provides integrations with leading project management tools like Jira and Trello for streamlined test management.

  5. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: Testsigma leverages AI and ML algorithms to enhance test automation by automatically maintaining test scripts, predicting element locators, and providing self-healing capabilities. In comparison, TestComplete offers AI-powered visual testing features for image-based validations and object identification but lacks advanced AI-driven functionalities for test maintenance.

  6. Community Support: TestComplete has a well-established user community and extensive documentation to support users with their automation testing needs. On the other hand, Testsigma also offers a growing community but provides additional support through live chat, webinars, and personalized onboarding sessions for user assistance.

In Summary, TestComplete and Testsigma differ in their automated testing approach, cloud-based testing capabilities, cross-browser testing support, integration with CI/CD tools, AI-driven functionalities, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

TestComplete
TestComplete
Testsigma
Testsigma

It is an automated UI testing tool that makes it fast and easy to create, maintain, and execute functional tests across desktop, web, and mobile applications. With TestComplete, you can increase test coverage and ensure you ship high-quality, battle-tested software

A Unified platform for Web, Mobile apps and API services' Automated Testing, It is test automation ecosystem with all the essential elements required for Agile & Continuous Delivery teams. Automated tests are written in simple English & involves no complex coding but with the flexibility that enterprise teams need. The tests can be run in parallel on thousands of device/OS/browser combos and physical mobile devices on a massive device cloud as well as on your local machines. It lets you drill down to specific test environments and identify what failed and why.

Building Automated UI Tests; Object Recognition Engine now with Artificial Intelligence; HTML5 Test Automation; Data-Driven Testing; Automated Test Reporting & Analysis
AI-Driven Maintenance; Automated Regression Testing; Automated Data-Driven Testing; Automated Cross-Browser Testing; Automated Web Application Testing; Automated Mobile Apps(Android & iOS)Testing; Automated Web Services Testing; Reusable Step Groups; Test Data Management; Activity, history of your tests; Centralized Object/Element Repository; Global Test Data Management; Custom Functions; Parallel Test Execution; Cross-Platform Testing; Massive Real devices' cloud; Local Test Executions; Schedulers; Comprehensive Visual Reports; Integration with CI/CD tools, Collaboration tools; Test Management; Requirements Management; Team Collaboration; Test Development Trend; Version Control; Automatic Bug Reporting; Email and Slack Notifications
Statistics
Stacks
39
Stacks
8
Followers
60
Followers
29
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Jenkins
Jenkins
Git
Git
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Jira
Jira
Bugzilla
Bugzilla
Linux
Linux
iOS
iOS
Jenkins
Jenkins
Slack
Slack
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Android OS
Android OS
CircleCI
CircleCI
Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs
Jira
Jira
Microsoft Edge
Microsoft Edge

What are some alternatives to TestComplete, Testsigma?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana