StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Apache Tomcat vs Zope

Apache Tomcat vs Zope

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat
Stacks16.9K
Followers12.6K
Votes201
GitHub Stars8.0K
Forks5.3K
Zope
Zope
Stacks175
Followers14
Votes1
GitHub Stars377
Forks106

Apache Tomcat vs Zope: What are the differences?

  1. Purpose: Apache Tomcat is a web server and servlet container used for deploying Java applications, while Zope is a web application server written in Python primarily designed for content management systems and portals.

  2. Language Support: Apache Tomcat is compatible with Java applications, providing support for Java Servlet, JavaServer Pages, and Java Expression Language. On the other hand, Zope is built using Python and emphasizes Python development for web applications and content management.

  3. Community and Ecosystem: Apache Tomcat has a large and active community, with extensive documentation and resources available to support users. Zope, although not as widely used, also has an active community that focuses on content management solutions and Python development.

  4. Flexibility and Extensibility: Apache Tomcat is known for its flexibility in deploying various Java web applications, supporting a wide range of frameworks and technologies. Zope, with its emphasis on content management, offers a more specialized environment tailored for content-centric applications.

  5. Scalability: Apache Tomcat is commonly used for large-scale enterprise applications, providing scalability options and cluster configurations for high-traffic websites. Zope, while capable of handling moderate to large projects, may not offer the same scalability features out of the box as Apache Tomcat.

  6. Development Approach: Apache Tomcat follows a more traditional Java web development approach, whereas Zope emphasizes a rapid development cycle and code reusability through its object-oriented design and content management features.

In Summary, Apache Tomcat and Zope differ in their primary purposes, language support, community support, flexibility, scalability, and development approaches.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Apache Tomcat, Zope

Hari
Hari

Mar 3, 2020

Needs advice

I was in a situation where I have to configure 40 RHEL servers 20 each for Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat server. My task was to

  1. configure LVM with required logical volumes, format and mount for HTTP and Tomcat servers accordingly.
  2. Install apache and tomcat.
  3. Generate and apply selfsigned certs to http server.
  4. Modify default ports on Tomcat to different ports.
  5. Create users on RHEL for application support team.
  6. other administrative tasks like, start, stop and restart HTTP and Tomcat services.

I have utilized the power of ansible for all these tasks, which made it easy and manageable.

419k views419k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat
Zope
Zope

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

It is a family of free and open-source web application servers written in Python, and their associated online community. It stands for "Z Object Publishing Environment", and was the first system using the now common object publishing methodology for the Web

-
Easy to use; Specific; Reusable
Statistics
GitHub Stars
8.0K
GitHub Stars
377
GitHub Forks
5.3K
GitHub Forks
106
Stacks
16.9K
Stacks
175
Followers
12.6K
Followers
14
Votes
201
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 79
    Easy
  • 72
    Java
  • 49
    Popular
  • 1
    Spring web
Cons
  • 3
    Blocking - each http request block a thread
  • 2
    Easy to set up
Pros
  • 1
    For using Plone CMS
Integrations
No integrations available
Python
Python
EasyEngine
EasyEngine
Plesk
Plesk
Scalyr
Scalyr
Datadog
Datadog
Tarantool
Tarantool
OpenResty
OpenResty

What are some alternatives to Apache Tomcat, Zope?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase